-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Background
The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3)-positive breast cancers as well as the association of GATA3 expression with response to chemotherapy.Patients and methodsTumor specimens obtained before neoadjuvant chemotherapy [paclitaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide)] from breast cancer patients (n = 130) were subjected to immunohistochemical and mutational analysis of GATA3 and DNA microarray gene expression analysis for intrinsic subtyping.ResultsSeventy-four tumors (57%) were immunohistochemically positive for GATA3. GATA3-positive tumors were significantly more likely to be lobular cancer, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive, Ki67-negative, and luminal A tumors. Somatic mutations were found in only three tumors. Pathological complete response (pCR) was observed in 8 (11%) GATA3-positive tumors and in 22 (39%) GATA3-negative tumors. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and GATA3 were independent predictors of pCR.ConclusionsGATA3-positive breast cancers showed luminal differentiation characterized by high ER expression and were mostly classified as luminal-type tumors following intrinsic subtyping. Interestingly, GATA3 was an independent predictor of response to chemotherapy, suggesting that GATA3 might be clinically useful as a predictor of a poor response to chemotherapy.
Annals of Oncology 07/2012; · 6.43 Impact Factor
-
Y Naoi,
T Tanei,
K Kishi,
R Tsunashima,
N Tominaga,
Y Baba, T Nakayama,
K Shimazu,
S J Kim,
Y Tamaki,
S Noguchi
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Association of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, Ki67 and 70-gene classifier (70-GC) with a response to paclitaxel (PAC) (n=79) or docetaxel (DOC) (n=55) was investigated in the neoadjuvant setting for breast cancer patients. Sensitivity of breast tumors to PAC, but not to DOC, was found to be significantly associated with ER negativity (P=0.003), PR negativity (P=0.007), and Ki67 positivity (P=0.007). Breast tumors classified into the responders by 70-GC showed a significantly (P=0.005) higher reduction rate to PAC and interestingly a significantly (P=0.009) lower reduction rate to DOC than those classified into the non-responders by 70-GC, suggesting that 70-GC might be useful for the differentiation of PAC-sensitive and DOC-sensitive breast tumors.
Cancer letters 01/2012; 314(2):206-12. · 4.86 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Recently, Ki67 index (cell proliferation marker) has been attracting a considerable attention as a prognostic factor in breast cancer but the prognostic significance of Ki67 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has rarely been examined.
Primary breast cancer patients (n = 102) treated with NAC (sequential paclitaxel 12 cycles (q1w) and 5-FU/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide 4 cycles (q3w)) were recruited in the study. Ki67, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) and breast cancer resistant protein (BCRP) and P-glycoprotein were determined by immunohistochemistry and HER2 was determined by FISH in tumor tissues obtained before and after NAC, and their association with patient prognosis (relapse-free survival) was examined.
Of the 102 patients, pCR was achieved in 30 (29.4%). In the 72 non-pCR patients, Ki67 index significantly (P < 0.001) decreased after NAC. Ki67 index after NAC, but not Ki67 index before NAC, was significantly associated with a patient prognosis (P = 0.022). Multivariate analysis has shown that Ki67 index after NAC is a marginally significant (P = 0.05) prognostic factor and that other biomarkers including ER, PR, BCRP, and P-glycoprotein before and after NAC are not significant.
Ki67 after NAC, but not before NAC, is prognostic in breast cancer patients, and might be clinically useful in the prognosis prediction of patients who do not achieve pCR after NAC. On the other hand, BCRP and P-glycoprotein before and after NAC are unlikely to be useful as prognostic factors in these patients.
European journal of surgical oncology: the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology 02/2011; 37(2):155-61. · 2.56 Impact Factor
