Stephen Turner,
Loren L Armstrong,
Yuki Bradford,
Christopher S Carlson,
Dana C Crawford,
Andrew T Crenshaw,
Mariza de Andrade,
Kimberly F Doheny,
Jonathan L Haines,
Geoffrey Hayes, [......],
Martha Matsumoto,
Catherine A McCarty,
Andrew N McDavid,
Daniel B Mirel,
Justin E Paschall,
Elizabeth W Pugh,
Luke V Rasmussen,
Russell A Wilke,
Rebecca L Zuvich,
Marylyn D Ritchie
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are being conducted at an unprecedented rate in population-based cohorts and have increased our understanding of the pathophysiology of complex disease. Regardless of context, the practical utility of this information will ultimately depend upon the quality of the original data. Quality control (QC) procedures for GWAS are computationally intensive, operationally challenging, and constantly evolving. Here we enumerate some of the challenges in QC of GWAS data and describe the approaches that the electronic MEdical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) network is using for quality assurance in GWAS data, thereby minimizing potential bias and error in GWAS results. We discuss common issues associated with QC of GWAS data, including data file formats, software packages for data manipulation and analysis, sex chromosome anomalies, sample identity, sample relatedness, population substructure, batch effects, and marker quality. We propose best practices and discuss areas of ongoing and future research.
Current protocols in human genetics / editorial board, Jonathan L. Haines ... [et al.] 01/2011; Chapter 1:Unit1.19.
