Sylvain Plante

Southlake Regional Health Centre, Bradford West Gwillimbury, Ontario, Canada

Are you Sylvain Plante?

Claim your profile

Publications (5)26.26 Total impact

  • Article: Prehospital diagnosis and triage of ST-elevation myocardial infarction by paramedics without advanced care training.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prehospital triage of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces treatment times. Prehospital triage and transport of STEMI patients have traditionally been undertaken in emergency medical service systems with Advanced Care Paramedics (ACPs). However, ACPs are not available in many regions. A pilot study was conducted to determine the feasibility of prehospital STEMI triage in a region with only Primary Care Paramedics. Hemodynamically stable patients with chest pain and suspected STEMI were brought directly to a catheterization laboratory for primary PCI. End points included accuracy of prehospital STEMI identification, complications during transfer, and treatment times. One hundred thirty-four consecutive patients with suspected STEMI were triaged for primary PCI. Only 1 patient developed complications during transport (rapid atrial flutter) that required ACP skills. One hundred thirty-three patients underwent urgent angiography, and 105 patients underwent PCI. Based on physician interpretation of the prehospital electrocardiogram, there was agreement with triage decision for 121 (90%) of the 134 cases. The final diagnosis based on the angiogram and cardiac markers was true STEMI for 106 patients and false positive for 28 patients. The median first medical contact to balloon time was 91 (81-115) minutes. Hemodynamically stable patients with suspected STEMI can be safely and effectively transported directly for primary PCI by paramedics without advanced care training. Prehospital STEMI triage for primary PCI can be extended to regions that have few or no paramedics with advanced care training.
    American heart journal 08/2012; 164(2):201-6. · 4.65 Impact Factor
  • Article: The sPLA2 Inhibition to Decrease Enzyme Release after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (SPIDER-PCI) trial.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Secretory phospholipase A(2) (sPLA(2)) may play a role in myonecrosis after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Inhibition of this enzyme may have a beneficial effect. The central hypothesis of this study was that treatment with varespladib, a small-molecule inhibitor of sPLA(2) would reduce postprocedural release of cardiac biomarkers after elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Between October 2007 and June 2009, 144 stable patients were randomized in a phase II trial to receive varespladib 500 mg PO BID or placebo 3 to 5 days before and for 5 days after elective percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was elevation of troponin I or creatine kinase-MB above the upper limit of normal at 6 to 8 or 18 to 24 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention. Mean age was 63±10 and 64±10 years, with 38% and 42% with diabetes mellitus and 29% and 28% with prior myocardial infarction for the varespladib and placebo groups, respectively. The primary end point occurred in 75% of varespladib and 63% of placebo patients (P=0.14). Troponin I 3 times the upper limit of normal was observed in 57% and 50% (P=0.39) and creatine kinase-MB 2 times the upper limit of normal in 14% and 3% (P=0.018). Median (first and third quartiles) change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in these 2 groups was 0.65 mg/L (-0.18 and 1.48) and 0.70 mg/L (0.00 and 1.50) at 18 to 24 hours (P=0.81) and 0.20 mg/L (-0.70 and 1.40) and 0.60 mg/L (-0.12 and 1.72) at 3 to 5 days (P=0.23), whereas change in sPLA(2) activity at 3 to 5 days in a subset was -2.85 ng/ml (-3.40 and -1.85) and 0.25 ng/ml (-0.20 and 0.85) (P<0.001). Inhibition of sPLA(2) by varespladib administered for 3 to 5 days before the procedure does not reduce periprocedural myonecrosis associated with elective percutaneous coronary intervention. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00533039.
    Circulation 12/2010; 122(23):2411-8. · 14.74 Impact Factor
  • Article: Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin on radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anticoagulant therapy is required to prevent radial artery occlusion (RAO) after transradial catheterization. There is no data comparing bivalirudin to standard heparin. We studied 400 consecutive patients. In case of diagnostic angiography-only (n = 200), they received an intravenous bolus of heparin (70 U kg(-1)) immediately before sheath removal whereas in case of angiography followed by ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 200), they received bivalirudin (bolus 0.75 mg kg(-1), followed by infusion at 1.75 mg/kg/h). RAO was assessed 4-8 weeks later using two-dimensional echography-doppler and reverse Allen's test with pulse oximetry. At follow-up, 21 of the 400 (5.3%) patients were found to have RAO with no significant difference between the two groups (3.5% bivalirudin vs. 7.0% heparin, P = 0.18). Patients with RAO had a significantly lower weight compared to patients without RAO (78 ± 13 kg vs. 86 ± 18 kg, P = 0.011). By multivariate analysis, a weight <84 kg (OR: 2.78, 95% CI 1.08-8.00, P = 0.032) and a procedure duration ≤20 min (OR: 7.52, 95% CI 1.57-36.0, P = 0.011) remained strong independent predictors of RAO. All cases of radial occlusion were asymptomatic and without clinical sequelae. Delayed administration of bivalirudin or heparin for transradial catheterization provides similar efficacy in preventing RAO. Because of its low cost, a single bolus of heparin can be preferred in case of diagnostic angiography whereas bivalirudin can be contemplated in case of ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
    Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 11/2010; 76(5):654-8. · 2.29 Impact Factor
  • Article: Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin on radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Anticoagulant therapy is required to prevent radial artery occlusion (RAO) after transradial catheterization. There is no data comparing bivalirudin to standard heparin. Methods: We studied 400 consecutive patients. In case of diagnostic angiography-only (n = 200), they received an intravenous bolus of heparin (70 U kg−1) immediately before sheath removal whereas in case of angiography followed by ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 200), they received bivalirudin (bolus 0.75 mg kg−1, followed by infusion at 1.75 mg/kg/h). RAO was assessed 4–8 weeks later using two-dimensional echography-doppler and reverse Allen's test with pulse oximetry. Results: At follow-up, 21 of the 400 (5.3%) patients were found to have RAO with no significant difference between the two groups (3.5% bivalirudin vs. 7.0% heparin, P = 0.18). Patients with RAO had a significantly lower weight compared to patients without RAO (78 ± 13 kg vs. 86 ± 18 kg, P = 0.011). By multivariate analysis, a weight <84 kg (OR: 2.78, 95% CI 1.08–8.00, P = 0.032) and a procedure duration ≤20 min (OR: 7.52, 95% CI 1.57–36.0, P = 0.011) remained strong independent predictors of RAO. All cases of radial occlusion were asymptomatic and without clinical sequelae. Conclusion: Delayed administration of bivalirudin or heparin for transradial catheterization provides similar efficacy in preventing RAO. Because of its low cost, a single bolus of heparin can be preferred in case of diagnostic angiography whereas bivalirudin can be contemplated in case of ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
    Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 10/2010; 76(5):654 - 658. · 2.29 Impact Factor
  • Article: Transradial coronary brachytherapy with the Novoste Beta-Rail system.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report our initial experience in 10 consecutive patients who underwent transradial coronary brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis using a 90Sr/Y source and the Novoste Beta-Rail system. In all patients, procedures were successfully completed using a right transradial approach. We performed the procedures with the Beta-Rail catheter using 7 Fr (Zuma II, Medtronic, MN; n = 5) or 8 Fr (Cordis, Miami, FL; n = 5) guiding catheters. All lesions were successfully dilated and no additional stent was inserted. We used a 40 mm source (n = 3) or a 60 mm source (n = 7) with manual stepping in four cases. In three cases, we did one stepping, and in one case, we did three steppings. The mean dwell time was 195 plus minus 44 sec. The mean delivered dose was 23 +/- 3 Gy at 2 mm distance from the source. No radiation treatment was interrupted. Mean fluoroscopy time was 26 +/- 13 min. Procedural success was achieved in all patients. Three patients had mild CK elevations (< 3 times upper normal limit). All patients were pretreated with clopidogrel (300 mg) and combined treatment with aspirin + clopidogrel is to be continued for at least 1 year. Clinical follow-up up to 3 months has not yielded any complication and all patients have remained free from angina.
    Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 03/2002; 55(3):362-6. · 2.29 Impact Factor