-
Otto Metzger-Filho,
Marion Procter,
Evandro de Azambuja,
Brian Leyland-Jones,
Richard D Gelber,
Mitchell Dowsett,
Sherene Loi,
Kamal S Saini,
David Cameron,
Michael Untch,
Ian Smith,
Luca Gianni,
Jose Baselga,
Christian Jackisch, Richard Bell,
Christos Sotiriou,
Giuseppe Viale,
Martine Piccart-Gebhart
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: PURPOSETo evaluate the benefit of adjuvant trastuzumab in patients diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) enrolled onto the Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients randomly assigned to receive one year of trastuzumab and one year of observation in the HERA trial were included (n = 3,401). Centrally reviewed estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and HER2 copy numbers were used. First site-specific relapse pattern was evaluated for ILC and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). The magnitude of trastuzumab benefit was assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsMedian follow-up time was 4 years. A total of 187 ILC and 3,213 IDC patients were included. High Allred scores (6 to 8) were more common in patients with ILC than IDC for both ER (36.9% v 22.7%) and PgR (44.1% v 28.5%). A trend toward decreased HER2 copy number was observed in the ILC group. The ILC and IDC subgroups had similar patterns of first site of disease relapse. DFS hazard ratios (HRs) comparing 1 year of trastuzumab versus observation were 0.63 for ILC (95% CI, 0.34 to 1.15) and 0.77 for IDC (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.89; P for interaction = .49). The OS HRs comparing 1 year of trastuzumab versus observation were 0.60 for ILC (95% CI, 0.27 to 1.31) and 0.86 for IDC (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.06; P for interaction = .29). CONCLUSION
In this retrospective analysis, there was no suggestion that patients in the ILC cohort experienced a different magnitude of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab than those in the IDC cohort.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 04/2013; · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
Robert E Coleman,
Helen Marshall,
David Cameron,
David Dodwell,
Roger Burkinshaw,
Maccon Keane,
Miguel Gil,
Stephen J Houston,
Robert J Grieve,
Peter J Barrett-Lee,
Diana Ritchie,
Julia Pugh,
Claire Gaunt,
Una Rea,
Jennifer Peterson,
Claire Davies,
Victoria Hiley,
Walter Gregory, Richard Bell
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Data suggest that the adjuvant use of bisphosphonates reduces rates of recurrence and death in patients with early-stage breast cancer. We conducted a study to determine whether treatment with zoledronic acid, in addition to standard adjuvant therapy, would improve disease outcomes in such patients.
In this open-label phase 3 study, we randomly assigned 3360 patients to receive standard adjuvant systemic therapy either with or without zoledronic acid. The zoledronic acid was administered every 3 to 4 weeks for 6 doses and then every 3 to 6 months to complete 5 years of treatment. The primary end point of the study was disease-free survival. A second interim analysis revealed that a prespecified boundary for lack of benefit had been crossed.
At a median follow-up of 59 months, there was no significant between-group difference in the primary end point, with a rate of disease-free survival of 77% in each group (adjusted hazard ratio in the zoledronic acid group, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.13; P=0.79). Disease recurrence or death occurred in 377 patients in the zoledronic acid group and 375 of those in the control group. The numbers of deaths--243 in the zoledronic acid group and 276 in the control group--were also similar, resulting in rates of overall survival of 85.4% in the zoledronic acid group and 83.1% in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.01; P=0.07). In the zoledronic acid group, there were 17 confirmed cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw (cumulative incidence, 1.1%; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.7; P<0.001) and 9 suspected cases; there were no cases in the control group. Rates of other adverse effects were similar in the two study groups.
These findings do not support the routine use of zoledronic acid in the adjuvant management of breast cancer. (Funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals and the National Cancer Research Network; AZURE Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN79831382.).
New England Journal of Medicine 10/2011; 365(15):1396-405. · 53.30 Impact Factor
-
Luca Gianni,
Urania Dafni,
Richard D Gelber,
Evandro Azambuja,
Susanne Muehlbauer,
Aron Goldhirsch,
Michael Untch,
Ian Smith,
José Baselga,
Christian Jackisch, [......],
Anna Pluzanska,
Vladimir Semiglazov,
Eduard Vrdoljak,
Michael J Eckart,
Zhenzhou Shen,
George Skiadopoulos,
Marion Procter,
Kathleen I Pritchard,
Martine J Piccart-Gebhart, Richard Bell
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Treatment with adjuvant trastuzumab for 1 year improves disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer. We aimed to assess disease-free survival and overall survival after a median follow-up of 4 years for patients enrolled on the Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial.
The HERA trial is an international, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing treatment with trastuzumab for 1 and 2 years with observation after standard neoadjuvant, adjuvant chemotherapy, or both in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. After a positive first interim analysis at a median follow-up of 1 year for the comparison of treatment with trastuzumab for 1 year with observation, event-free patients in the observation group were allowed to cross over to receive trastuzumab. We report trial outcomes for the 1-year trastuzumab and observation groups at a median follow-up of 48·4 months (IQR 42·0-56·5) and assess the effect of the extensive crossover to trastuzumab. Our analysis was by intention-to-treat. The HERA trial is registered with the European Clinical Trials Database, number 2005-002385-11.
The HERA trial population comprised 1698 patients randomly assigned to the observation group and 1703 to the 1-year trastuzumab group. Intention-to-treat analysis of disease-free survival showed a significant benefit in favour of patients in the 1-year trastuzumab group (4-year disease-free survival 78·6%) compared with the observation group (4-year disease-free survival 72·2%; hazard ratio [HR] 0·76; 95% CI 0·66-0·87; p<0·0001). Intention-to-treat analysis of overall survival showed no significant difference in the risk of death (4-year overall survival 89·3%vs 87·7%, respectively; HR 0·85; 95% CI 0·70-1·04; p=0·11). Overall, 885 patients (52%) of the 1698 patients in the observation group crossed over to receive trastuzumab, and began treatment at median 22·8 months (range 4·5-52·7) from randomisation. In a non-randomised comparison, patients in the selective-crossover cohort had fewer disease-free survival events than patients remaining in the observation group (adjusted HR 0·68; 95% CI 0·51-0·90; p=0·0077). Higher incidences of grade 3-4 and fatal adverse events were noted on 1-year trastuzumab than in the observation group. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events, each in less than 1% of patients, were congestive cardiac failure, hypertension, arthralgia, back pain, central-line infection, hot flush, headache, and diarrhoea.
Treatment with adjuvant trastuzumab for 1 year after chemotherapy is associated with significant clinical benefit at 4-year median follow-up. The substantial selective crossover of patients in the observation group to trastuzumab was associated with improved outcomes for this cohort.
F Hoffmann-La Roche, Michelangelo Foundation.
The lancet oncology 02/2011; 12(3):236-44. · 14.47 Impact Factor
-
Ian Smith,
Marion Procter,
Richard D Gelber,
Sébastien Guillaume,
Andrea Feyereislova,
Mitch Dowsett,
Aron Goldhirsch,
Michael Untch,
Gabriella Mariani,
Jose Baselga, [......],
Robert Coleman,
Andrew Wardley,
Nadia Harbeck,
Roberto I Lopez,
Peter Mallmann,
Karen Gelmon,
Nicholas Wilcken,
Erik Wist,
Pedro Sánchez Rovira,
Martine J Piccart-Gebhart
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Trastuzumab--a humanised monoclonal antibody against HER2--has been shown to improve disease-free survival after chemotherapy in women with HER2-positive early breast cancer. We investigated the drug's effect on overall survival after a median follow-up of 2 years in the Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) study.
HERA is an international multicentre randomised trial that compared 1 or 2 years of trastuzumab treatment with observation alone after standard neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy in women with HER2-positive node positive or high-risk node negative breast cancer. 5102 women participated in the trial; we analysed data from 1703 women who had been randomised for treatment with trastuzumab for 1 year and 1698 women from the control group, with median follow-up of 23.5 months (range 0-48 months). The primary endpoint of the trial was disease-free survival. Here, we assess overall survival, a secondary endpoint. Analyses were done on an intent-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with the European Clinical Trials Database, number 2005-002385-11.
97 (5.7%) patients randomised to observation alone and 58 (3.4%) patients randomised to 1 year of treatment with trastuzumab were lost to follow-up. 172 women stopped trastuzumab prematurely. 59 deaths were reported for trastuzumab and 90 in the control group. The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the risk of death with trastuzumab compared with observation alone was 0.66 (95% CI 0.47-0.91; p=0.0115). 218 disease-free survival events were reported with trastuzumab compared with 321 in the control group. The unadjusted HR for the risk of an event with trastuzumab compared with observation alone was 0.64 (0.54-0.76; p<0.0001).
Our results show that 1 year of treatment with trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy has a significant overall survival benefit after a median follow-up of 2 years. The emergence of this benefit after only 2 years reinforces the importance of trastuzumab in the treatment of women with HER2-positive early breast cancer.
The Lancet 02/2007; 369(9555):29-36. · 38.28 Impact Factor
-
The Oncologist 02/2006; 11 Suppl 1:1-3. · 3.91 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Up to one fourth of women diagnosed with early breast cancer (EBC) have tumors that are human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) positive. This is associated with a high risk of relapse and death from meta-static disease. Trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the extracellular domain of HER-2, improves survival and quality of life in women with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. Four major adjuvant trials-Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA), National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-31, North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831, and Breast Cancer International Research Group (BCIRG) 006-including between them >13,000 women with HER-2-positive EBC, have investigated different adjuvant treatment approaches with trastuzumab. These trials have shown that trastuzumab reduces the 3-year risk of recurrence by about half in this population. The benefit was similar across the trials despite differences in patient populations, chemotherapy regimens, and sequencing of treatment. At a 2-year follow-up, interim results from the combined analysis of the NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831 trials showed a one third lower mortality for trastuzumab, and there was a trend toward an overall survival benefit in the HERA and BCIRG trials. A small Finnish trial, FinHer, investigating another regimen of trastuzumab, has also shown similarly positive results. Further follow-up of the major adjuvant trials will clarify the survival benefit for women receiving trastuzumab, as well as the optimal treatment duration (1 or 2 years). Notably, cardiac events in the trastuzumab-containing arms of these trials have remained within acceptable levels, with a slightly higher (0.6%-3.3%) incidence of congestive heart failure that mostly responded to treatment. Further follow-up will provide information on long-term cardiac safety. Overall, results from clinical trials are sufficiently compelling to consider 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab treatment for women with HER-2-positive EBC based on the risk:benefit ratio demonstrated in these studies.
The Oncologist 02/2006; 11 Suppl 1:4-12. · 3.91 Impact Factor
-
Martine J Piccart-Gebhart,
Marion Procter,
Brian Leyland-Jones,
Aron Goldhirsch,
Michael Untch,
Ian Smith,
Luca Gianni,
Jose Baselga, Richard Bell,
Christian Jackisch, [......],
Caroline Lohrisch,
Thomas M Suter,
Josef Rüschoff,
Tamás Suto,
Victoria Greatorex,
Carol Ward,
Carolyn Straehle,
Eleanor McFadden,
M Stella Dolci,
Richard D Gelber
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Trastuzumab, a recombinant monoclonal antibody against HER2, has clinical activity in advanced breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. We investigated its efficacy and safety after excision of early-stage breast cancer and completion of chemotherapy.
This international, multicenter, randomized trial compared one or two years of trastuzumab given every three weeks with observation in patients with HER2-positive and either node-negative or node-positive breast cancer who had completed locoregional therapy and at least four cycles of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy.
Data were available for 1694 women randomly assigned to two years of treatment with trastuzumab, 1694 women assigned to one year of trastuzumab, and 1693 women assigned to observation. We report here the results only of treatment with trastuzumab for one year or observation. At the first planned interim analysis (median follow-up of one year), 347 events (recurrence of breast cancer, contralateral breast cancer, second nonbreast malignant disease, or death) were observed: 127 events in the trastuzumab group and 220 in the observation group. The unadjusted hazard ratio for an event in the trastuzumab group, as compared with the observation group, was 0.54 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.43 to 0.67; P<0.0001 by the log-rank test, crossing the interim analysis boundary), representing an absolute benefit in terms of disease-free survival at two years of 8.4 percentage points. Overall survival in the two groups was not significantly different (29 deaths with trastuzumab vs. 37 with observation). Severe cardiotoxicity developed in 0.5 percent of the women who were treated with trastuzumab.
One year of treatment with trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves disease-free survival among women with HER2-positive breast cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00045032.)
New England Journal of Medicine 10/2005; 353(16):1659-72. · 53.30 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To optimize patient management in breast cancer a number of factors are considered, including hormone receptor and HER2 status. A feasible approach for women with less aggressive, estrogen receptor/HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is to consider trastuzumab (Herceptin; F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland) combined with endocrine therapy. Randomized clinical trials are ongoing to assess the combination of trastuzumab with aromatase inhibitors. In patients with aggressive HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, trastuzumab/chemotherapy combination regimens are warranted. When administered first line in combination with a taxane, trastuzumab improves all clinical outcome parameters, including survival, in such patients. Trastuzumab adds little to the toxicity profile of taxanes, and trastuzumab combination therapy is associated with improvements in quality of life when compared with chemotherapy alone. There is encouraging evidence of improved efficacy when trastuzumab is combined with other cytotoxic agents with proven single-agent activity in breast cancer, including capecitabine (Xeloda; F. Hoffmann-La Roche), gemcitabine, and vinorelbine. Trastuzumab is also being investigated as part of triplet drug regimens. Trastuzumab has good single-agent activity in first-line therapy. This is of relevance to women with HER2-positive disease who are not suitable for, or do not wish to receive, cytotoxic chemotherapy. The benefits noted with trastuzumab-containing regimens were documented in clinical trials where trastuzumab was given until disease progression. A further rationale exists to continue trastuzumab beyond progression. Data from retrospective reviews indicate that this strategy is feasible.
Seminars in Oncology 11/2004; 31(5 Suppl 10):35-44. · 3.50 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Metastatic bone disease constitutes a major clinical problem. Skeletal complications are common and lead to significant morbidity, and patients live with metastatic bone disease for several years, increasing the prevalence of this problem. Effective management aims to reduce the incidence of skeletal complications and relieve symptoms, such as severe bone pain, which adversely affect patient mobility and quality of life. This article describes and discusses strategies for managing metastatic bone disease, with particularly emphasis on the role of the bisphosphonate ibandronate. Two case histories show the long-term efficacy and tolerability of oral ibandronate in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The third case history illustrates the benefits of rapid pain relief from an intensive, high-dose regimen of intravenous ibandronate in metastatic prostate cancer.
Seminars in Oncology 11/2004; 31(5 Suppl 10):83-6. · 3.50 Impact Factor
