Publications (4)13.71 Total impact
-
Article: False-negative rate of abdominal sonography for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis B and elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein levels.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Routine screening for hepatocellular carcinoma among chronic carriers of hepatitis B virus using a combination of abdominal sonography and serum alpha-fetoprotein levels is widely practiced. Negative results on an abdominal sonogram generally indicate the absence of hepatocellular carcinoma despite the elevation of alpha-fetoprotein levels, but the false-negative rate of abdominal sonography has not been established prospectively. In our screening program, we routinely investigated patients with Lipiodol (iodized oil) CT when they presented with alpha-fetoprotein levels above 20 ng/mL or a focal lesion as depicted on abdominal sonography. Lipiodol CT comprised a hepatic angiogram with injection of Lipiodol selectively in the hepatic arteries, followed by an unenhanced CT scan 10 days later. Positive findings on Lipiodol CT were confirmed histologically by biopsy or surgical resection. We defined false-negative as histologic diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma within 3 months of normal findings on screening abdominal sonography. One hundred three patients with elevated alpha-fetoprotein levels were investigated with Lipiodol CT within 2 months of abdominal sonography. Of these, three of 70 patients with negative abdominal sonography had histologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma. Thus, abdominal sonography has a false-negative rate of 4.3%. Lipiodol CT is associated with a significant false-positive rate of 43.7%. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of abdominal sonography for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma among hepatitis B virus carriers with elevated alpha-fetoprotein levels was 85.7%, 81.7%, and 54.5%, respectively. Negative results on a screening abdominal sonogram among hepatitis B virus carriers with elevated alpha-fetoprotein levels does not rule out the presence of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Routine use of Lipiodol CT as a supplementary screening tool is not recommended.American Journal of Roentgenology 09/2004; 183(2):453-8. · 2.78 Impact Factor -
Article: A phase I safety and pharmacokinetic study of OGT 719 in patients with liver cancer.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OGT 719 (Oxford GlycoSciences, Abingdon, UK) is a novel nucleoside analogue with a galactose molecule attached to a fluorinated pyrimidine. OGT 719 has the capacity selectively to bind to asialoglycoprotein receptors that are found exclusively on hepatocytes and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. The aim of this study was to establish the safety and to examine the pharmacokinetics of this novel compound in patients with liver cancer. Fourteen patients received a total of 37 cycles of OGT 719 at four dose levels ([500 mg/m2 first cycle, 1 000 mg/m2 subsequent cycles], 1000 mg/m2, 3 300 mg/m2 and 7500 mg/m2). OGT 719 was administered as a 3-h intravenous infusion in a 250 ml saline solution, daily for 5 days every 4 weeks. Pharmacokinetic parameters were studied during the first cycle of dose levels 1 and 2 (500 mg/m2. and 1 000 mg/m2, respectively). The maximum plasma concentration was attained within 5 min of completing the infusion and almost doubled, dose dependently, with a doubling of the infused dose. The plasma level declined rapidly in a monophasic manner with an elimination half-life of 2.1 and 2.5 h for dose level 1 and 2, respectively The mean area under the curve (AUC(o - infinity) area under the curve to 24 h; AUC(o - infinity), area under the curve to infinity) doubled at the higher dose level. None of the patients had a significant tumor response. Elimination half-life of OGT 719 by 3-h intravenous infusion is short and monophasic. Toxicity was minimal at the highest dose level.Acta Oncologica 02/2004; 43(3):245-51. · 3.33 Impact Factor -
Article: A Phase I-II study of sequential administration of topotecan and oral etoposide (toposiomerase I and II inhibitors) in the treatment of patients with small cell lung carcinoma.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Topotecan (9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycampthothecin) is a new topoisomerase I inhibitor with promising efficacy in the treatment of patients with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Combination with a topoisomerase II inhibitor may potentate the therapeutic effect of topotecan, although there has been conflicting preclinical information on the combination. The objectives of this study were to establish the maximum tolerated dose and to determine the efficacy of the sequential combination of intravenous topotecan and oral etoposide in the treatment of patients with SCLC. Patients with histologically confirmed, limited or extensive stage SCLC were eligible. The dose escalation scheme of three cohorts (six patients per cohort) started at intravenous topotecan 0.5 mg/m(2) per day for 5 days and oral etoposide 50 mg twice daily for 7 days (21-day cycles). Subsequent dose levels involved escalation of topotecan to 0.75 mg/m(2) per day and 1.0 mg/m(2) per day for 5 days. A Phase II study was conducted at one dose level below the maximum tolerated dose. The authors alternated the drug sequence with each consecutive cycle and compared the hematologic toxicity between the two sequences. Thirty-six patients (21 patients with limited disease and 15 patients with extensive disease) received a total of 173 courses of sequential combination chemotherapy (topotecan --> etoposide, 88 courses; etoposide --> topotecan, 85 courses). The authors identified dose levels for the Phase II study as follows: topotecan, 0.75 mg/m(2) per day for 5 days; and etoposide, 50 mg twice daily for 7 days. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. At this dose level, the incidence of Grade 3-4 neutropenia and the incidence of Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia were 25% and 10.9%, respectively. Two patients died from neutropenic sepsis. There was no significant difference in hematologic toxicities between the two sequences. Complete and partial response rates were 5.6% and 55.6%, respectively (limited disease, 9.5% and 66.75%; extensive disease, 0% and 40%, respectively). The median progression free survival was 31.9 weeks (limited disease, 36.1 weeks; extensive disease, 28.9 weeks; 95% confidence interval, 25.6-36.0 weeks), and the median overall survival was 52.4 weeks (limited disease, 54.9 weeks; extensive disease, 30.1 weeks; 95% confidence interval, 39.6-57.7 weeks). Combination therapy with topoisomerase I and II inhibitors is a safe and effective regimen for patients with SCLC. Future research on this combination should focus on an oral regimen for patients with extensive disease and poor tolerance to cisplatin. The authors recommend an oral dosage of topotecan at 1.2 mg/m(2) per day (equivalent to intravenous topotecan at 0.75 mg/m(2) per day) for 5 days followed by etoposide 50 mg twice daily for 7 days.Cancer 11/2002; 95(7):1511-9. · 4.77 Impact Factor -
Article: A multi-centre randomized phase II study of nolatrexed versus doxorubicin in treatment of Chinese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Purpose: A multi-centre randomized phase II study of single agent nolatrexed dihydrochloride versus doxorubicin was undertaken in Chinese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to study and compare the clinical efficacy of the two drugs. Methods: Fifty-four patients with clinical or histological diagnosis of HCC were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive nolatrexed or doxorubicin. Nolatrexed 725 mg/m2/day was given by continuous infusion via a central venous device for 5 days and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 was given as a rapid intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Results: No objective responses were observed in either treatment arm. Two patients in the nolatrexed arm and none in the doxorubicin arm had >50% decline in serum α-fetoprotein. The median survival for the patients in the nolatrexed and doxorubicin arms was 139 days and 104 days, respectively. Moderate toxicities including leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis and skin rash were observed in both treatment arms. Conclusion: Nolatrexed and doxorubicin are minimally active in the treatment of advanced HCC. Given the small sample size, no difference is observed between the two drugs.Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 07/1999; 44(4):307-311. · 2.83 Impact Factor
Top co-authors
Top Journals
Institutions
-
1999–2004
-
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
- • Prince of Wales Hospital
- • Department of Clinical Oncology
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
-
