P Bennett

Publications (2)10.08 Total impact

• Source

  Available from: Jim Turner

  Article: A micro costing of NHS cancer genetic services.

  G L Griffith, R Tudor-Edwards, J Gray, R Butler, C Wilkinson, J Turner, B France, P Bennett
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: This paper presents the first full micro costing of a commonly used cancer genetic counselling and testing protocol used in the UK. Costs were estimated for the Cardiff clinic of the Cancer Genetics Service in Wales by issuing a questionnaire to all staff, conducting an audit of clinic rooms and equipment and obtaining gross unit costs from the finance department. A total of 22 distinct event pathways were identified for patients at risk of developing breast, ovarian, breast and ovarian or colorectal cancer. The mean cost per patient were pound sterling 97- pound sterling 151 for patients at moderate risk, pound sterling 975- pound sterling 3072 for patients at high risk of developing colorectal cancer and pound sterling 675- pound sterling 2909 for patients at high risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. The most expensive element of cancer genetic services was labour. Labour costs were dependent upon the amount of labour, staff grade, number of counsellors used and the proportion of staff time devoted to indirect patient contact. With the growing demand for cancer genetic services and the growing number of national and regional cancer genetic centers, there is a need for the different protocols being used to be thoroughly evaluated in terms of costs and outcomes.
  British Journal of Cancer 02/2005; 92(1):60-71. · 5.04 Impact Factor
• Source

  Available from: Jim Turner

  Article: Estimating the survival benefits gained from providing national cancer genetic services to women with a family history of breast cancer.

  G L Griffith, R T Edwards, J Gray, C Wilkinson, J Turner, B France, P Bennett
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: The aim of this paper is to compare a service offering genetic testing and presymptomatic surveillance to women at increased risk of developing breast cancer with its predecessor of no service at all in terms of survival and quality-adjusted survival (QALYs) by means of a Markov cohort chain simulation model. Genetic assessment and presymptomatic care provided between 0.07-1.61 mean additional life years and 0.05-1.67 mean QALYs over no services. Prophylactic surgery and surveillance extended mean life expectancy by 0.41-1.61 and 0.32-0.99 years, respectively over no services for high-risk women. Model outcomes were sensitive to all the parameters varied in the sensitivity analysis. Providing cancer genetic services increase survival and as long as services do not induce adverse psychological effects they also provide more QALYs. The greatest survival and QALY benefits were found for women with identified mutations. As more cancer genes are identified, the survival and cost-effectiveness of genetic services will improve. Although mastectomy provided most additional life years, when quality of life was accounted for oophorectomy was the optimal strategy. Delayed entry into coordinated genetic services was found to diminish the average survival and QALY gains for a woman utilising these services.
  British Journal of Cancer 06/2004; 90(10):1912-9. · 5.04 Impact Factor