-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Aims: To determine the influences of prostaglandin inhibition by indomethacin on 24-h intragastric acidity and plasma gastrin concentration, related to gastric mucosal injury.Methods: A pre- and post-treatment study design was employed in 10 Helicobacter pylori negative healthy male subjects. All subjects underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at least 3 days before and after 7 days dosing with indomethacin 50 mg t.d.s. Mucosal damage was scored according to the Lanza method, and biopsies were taken for H. pylori status and assay of mucosal concentrations of prostaglandin (PG)E2 and leukotriene (LT)B4. Before and on the last day of dosing, intragastric acidity was measured by continuous 24-h pH monitoring, and plasma gastrin levels determined by radioimmunoassay in blood samples collected over the same period.Results: All subjects completed the study and no serious adverse events were reported. The mucosal injury score increased significantly from 0 (0–2) to 3.4 (0–8) (mean and range of values, P < 0.05) after dosing with indomethacin. No differences were observed in 24-h mean pH or meal stimulated plasma gastrin concentrations. Mucosal PGE2 and LTB4 were unchanged 8–10 h after the last indomethacin dose.Conclusions: Endogenous prostaglandins do not appear to alter intragastric acidity or gastrin secretion, in contrast to the PGE analogues, whose effects must be more pharmacological than physiological.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 03/2007; 9(6):625 - 631. · 3.77 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The prevalence of Barrett's oesophagus in patients undergoing gastroscopy may be influenced by possible referral bias.
To present the prevalence of Barrett's oesophagus from the the Canadian Adult Dyspepsia Empirical Therapy Prompt Endoscopy study and to explore potential risk factors for its presence.
Patients had not been on treatment for dyspepsia for 2-4 weeks prior to endoscopy, which was performed within 10 working days of presentation.
Barrett's oesophagus was endoscopically suspected in 53 of 1040 cases (5%) and histologically confirmed by the presence of intestinal metaplasia in 25 (2.4%). The prevalence of biopsy-proven Barrett's oesophagus was 4% in patients with dominant reflux-like symptoms. Sixty-four percent with confirmed Barrett's oesophagus had dominant reflux-like symptoms compared with 37% without Barrett's oesophagus. Barrett's oesophagus was more common in patients >50 years of age; 68% of cases were males. The mean duration of symptoms was 10 years, yet 16% had symptoms of <1-year duration. Endoscopic reflux oesophagitis was present in 68% of confirmed Barrett's oesophagus patients.
Barrett's oesophagus is confirmed on biopsy in about half of endoscopically suspected Barrett's oesophagus patients. Barrett's oesophagus is more common in males, in those with dominant reflux-like symptoms, and in patients with a longer symptom history.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 04/2006; 23(5):595-9. · 3.77 Impact Factor
-
M A Puhan,
G H Guyatt,
D Armstrong,
I Wiklund,
C A Fallone,
D Heels-Ansdell,
A Degl'Innocenti,
S J O Veldhuyzen van Zanten,
L Tanser,
A N Barkun, N Chiba,
P Austin,
S El-Dika,
H J Schünemann
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Symptom diaries are potentially attractive but, because of concerns about patient compliance, they have had limited use in clinical trials. We assessed the validity and responsiveness of a symptom diary for patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
We included 215 patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease after starting treatment for 4 weeks with 40 mg esomeprazole once daily. Patients recorded whether they experienced night-time heartburn (yes/no), the severity of daytime heartburn on a scale from 1 (no heartburn) to 4 (severe heartburn) and their antacid use. Patients also completed a number of disease-specific and preference-based Health-related Quality of Life questionnaires at baseline and follow-up.
Consistent with a priori predictions, daytime heartburn showed moderate to strong correlations with the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia questionnaire (0.36-0.67) and four scales of symptom severity (0.36-0.70) for baseline, follow-up and change scores, but low correlations with the Standard Gamble. Responsiveness of the daytime heartburn item was excellent with a mean change from baseline to follow-up of -1.3 (95% CI -1.4 to -1.1) and a standardized response mean of 1.33 while responsiveness of the daily antacid use item was moderate (mean change scores -1.8 tablets taken, 95% CI -2.3 to -1.3 and standardized response mean of 0.64).
The excellent psychometric properties of this simple gastro-oesophageal reflux disease diary make it an attractive measure for future trials.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 03/2006; 23(4):531-41. · 3.77 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Currently there is no consensus on the optimal method to measure the severity of dyspepsia symptoms in clinical trials.
To validate the 7-point Global Overall Symptom scale.
The Global Overall Symptom scale uses a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = no problem to 7 = a very severe problem. Validation was performed in two randomized-controlled trials (n = 1121 and 512). Construct validity: Global Overall Symptom was compared with the Quality of Life in Reflux And Dyspepsia, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, Reflux Disease Questionnaire and 10 specific symptoms using Spearman correlation coefficients. Test-retest reliability: The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was calculated for patients with stable dyspepsia defined by no change in Overall Treatment Effect score over two visits. Responsiveness: effect size and standardized response mean were also calculated.
Construct validity: Change in Global Overall Symptom score correlated significantly with Quality of Life for Reflux And Dyspepsia, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, Reflux Disease Questionnaire and specific symptoms (all P < 0.0002). Reliability: The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.62 (n = 205) and 0.42 (n = 270). Responsiveness: There was a positive correlation between change in Global Overall Symptom and change in symptom severity. The effect size and standardized response mean were 1.1 and 2.1, respectively.
The Global Overall Symptom scale is a simple, valid outcome measure for dyspepsia treatment trials.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 02/2006; 23(4):521-9. · 3.77 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: There are few data on empiric, stepped therapy for heartburn relief or subsequent relapse in primary care.
To compare heartburn relief produced by a proton pump inhibitor-start or an H(2)-receptor antagonist-start with step-up therapy, as needed, followed by a treatment-free period to assess relapse.
Heartburn-dominant uninvestigated dyspepsia patients from 46 primary care centres were randomized to one of two active treatment strategies: omeprazole 20 mg daily (proton pump inhibitor-start) or ranitidine 150 mg bid (H2-receptor antagonist-start) for the first 4-8 weeks, stepping up to omeprazole 40 or 20 mg daily, respectively, for 4-8 weeks for persistent symptoms. Daily diaries documented heartburn relief (score < or = 3/7 on < or = of 7 prior days) and relapse (score > or = 4 on > or = 2 of 7 prior days).
For 'proton pump inhibitor-start' (n = 196) vs. 'H2-receptor antagonist-start' (n = 194), respectively, heartburn relief occurred in 55.1% vs. 27.3% (P < 0.001) at 4 weeks and in 88.3% vs. 87.1% at 16 weeks. After therapy, 308 patients were heartburn-free (159 vs. 149); median times to relapse were 8 vs. 9 days and cumulative relapse rates were 78.6% vs. 75.8%, respectively.
An empiric 'proton pump inhibitor-start' strategy relieves heartburn more effectively than an 'H2-receptor antagonist-start' strategy up to 12 weeks but has no effect on subsequent relapse, which is rapid in most patients.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 06/2005; 21(10):1189-202. · 3.77 Impact Factor
-
Aliment.Pharmacol.Ther. 01/2005; 21(10):1189-1202.
-
C A Fallone,
G H Guyatt,
D Armstrong,
I Wiklund,
A Degl'Innocenti,
D Heels-Ansdell,
A N Barkun, N Chiba,
S J O V Zanten,
S El-Dika,
P Austin,
L Tanser,
H J Schünemann
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The accuracy of physicians' assessment of the severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is unclear.
To correlate physician and patient assessment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease severity and its response to treatment.
Adult uninvestigated gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients (n = 217) completed symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaires at baseline and after treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg p.o. daily. Pearson coefficients quantified correlations between physician assessments and patient responses.
At baseline, the strongest correlations were heartburn severity (0.31), overall symptom severity (0.44) and a domain of the quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia questionnaire (0.31) (P < 0.001). Correlations of change with treatment were greater than baseline correlations: heartburn (0.39), overall symptoms (0.50) and global rate of change -- stomach problems (0.72, all P < 0.001). The mean difference between the physicians' assessment of change and the patients' global rating of change was 0.20 (95% confidence intervals: 0.10-0.29) with physicians overestimating benefit.
Correlations were often significant, although weak to moderate and better with symptom severity than with health-related quality of life instruments as well as with change after therapy than at baseline. Increasing attention to health-related quality of life may help physicians better understand patients' experience. In clinical trials, treatment success should be assessed by the patient as well as the physician.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 11/2004; 20(10):1161-9. · 3.77 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Adult Helicobacter pylori-positive patients by 13C-urea breath test with uninvestigated dyspepsia symptoms were randomized to 1-week eradication treatment with omeprazole, metronidazole and clarithromycin (OMC) vs. omeprazole and placebo antimicrobials (OPP) in the Canadian Adult Dyspepsia Empiric Treatment-H. pylori-positive (CADET-Hp) study.
To perform an economic evaluation of this 1-year study.
Following blind eradication treatment, family practitioners managed patients according to their usual practices. Health resource utilization information was collected prospectively. From the mean costs of the health resources consumed and the treatment outcomes, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and incremental net benefits of eradication treatment vs. OPP were determined.
Eradication therapy significantly improved dyspepsia symptoms (treatment success: OMC, 50%; OPP, 36%; P = 0.02). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of OMC vs. OPP was - 387 Canadian dollars (CAD$) per treatment success (90% CI, - CAD$1707, CAD$607), indicating a lower cost with treatment success. The incremental net benefit analysis showed that H. pylori eradication was cost-effective if the willingness-to-pay value exceeded a nominal figure of CAD$100 from a health service perspective or CAD$607 from the societal perspective.
In uninvestigated patients presenting with dyspepsia at the primary care level, eradication of H. pylori in those who are H. pylori positive leads to a cost-effective improvement in dyspepsia symptoms compared with a strategy of not eradicating H. pylori in these patients.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 03/2004; 19(3):349-58. · 3.77 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Uninvestigated dyspepsia is common in family practice. The prevalence of clinically significant upper gastrointestinal findings (CSFs) in adult uninvestigated dyspepsia patients, and their predictability based on history, is unknown.
Prompt endoscopy was performed within 10 days of referral, in 1040 adult patients presenting with uninvestigated dyspepsia at 49 Canadian family practitioner centres. Subsequent management strategies during a 6-month follow-up period were determined by the individual family practitioners.
CSFs were identified in 58% (603/1040) of patients. Erosive oesophagitis was most common (43%; N = 451); peptic ulcer was uncommon (5.3%; N = 55). Alarm symptoms were uncommon (2.8%; N = 29). Most patients had at least three dyspepsia symptoms, more than 80% had at least six, and approximately half had eight or more. Based on the dominant symptom, 463 (45%) patients had ulcer-like, 393 (38%) had reflux-like and 184 (18%) had dysmotility-like dyspepsia. The patients' dominant symptom was not predictive of endoscopic findings. Oesophagitis was more common in those with dominant reflux-like symptoms and was the most common finding in all subgroups. The prevalence of gastroduodenal findings was similar in all symptom subgroups. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection (30%; 301/1013) was associated with gastroduodenal findings.
Dyspepsia subclassifications, based on dominant symptom, are of limited value in predicting the presence and nature of CSFs. Oesophagitis was by far the most common diagnosis (43% of patients). CSFs were common in uninvestigated dyspepsia patients and their nature suggests patients could be initially treated effectively, without endoscopy, using empirical acid suppressive therapy.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 07/2003; 17(12):1481-91. · 3.77 Impact Factor
-
Aliment.Pharmacol.Ther. 01/2003; 17:1481-1491.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Recognition of the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastroduodenal disease has increased greatly in recent years. To avoid complications of H pylori infection, such as the development of recurrent duodenal and gastric ulcers, effective therapies are required for eradication of the infection. This article reviews ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC), a novel complex of ranitidine, bismuth and citrate, which was developed specifically for the purpose of eradicating H pylori. Dual therapy with RBC in combination with clarithromycin for 14 days yields eradication rates of 76%. Triple therapy bid for one week with a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or a nitroimidazole (tinidazole or metronidazole) is advocated as the treatment of choice for H pylori eradication. Analogous regimens with RBC in place of proton pump inhibitors show effective eradication rates in comparative studies and with pooled data. RBC, used alone or in combination with other antibiotics, appears to be a safe and effective drug for the treatment of H pylori infection. Bismuth levels do not appear to rise to toxic levels.
Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie 07/2001; 15(6):389-98. · 1.21 Impact Factor
-
Canadian Medical Association Journal 02/2001; 164(2):174-5. · 8.22 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Patients with duodenal ulcer (DU) have an increased parietal cell mass and sensitivity to secretagogues, with increased acid output.
To determine the effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on parietal cell sensitivity and gastric acid secretion.
Twenty-five H pylori-positive DU patients and 18 H pylori-negative healthy volunteers were studied. Serum H pylori immunoglobulin G, basal acid output and acid secretory response to graded doses of pentagastrin were determined before and after treatment, at six months and at one year. Subjects were randomly assigned to ranitidine or sucralfate treatment for six weeks, and all DU patients received bismuth subsalicylate, metronidazole and tetracycline for the first two weeks.
H pylori was eradicated in 66% of patients receiving sucralfate and 92% receiving ranitidine. Compared with healthy volunteers, DU patients demonstrated a 2.7-fold greater basal acid output, a 1.3-fold greater peak acid output, significantly higher acid output for each dose of pentagastrin and a 1.38-fold increase in the area under the pentagastrin dose acid response curve. Cure of H pylori, irrespective of ulcer healing regimen, resulted in a gradual decrease in acid secretory capacity with basal acid output, peak acid output and area under the pentagastrin dose acid response curve returning to healthy volunteer levels by one year. No demonstrable differences were observed in parietal cell sensitivity in all subjects before or after treatment. These data suggest that disturbances in acid secretion in H pylori-positive DU patients are not due to an increased parietal cell sensitivity to pentagastrin but rather due to an increased parietal cell mass with increased capacity to secrete acid, which gradually resolves following cure.
Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie 02/2001; 15(1):29-39. · 1.21 Impact Factor
-
N Chiba
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Bismuth compounds remain useful for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. These include colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS), bismuth subsalicylate (BSS) and, most recently, ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC). CBS appears to prevent the development of imidazole resistance when coadministered with nitroimidazoles. Traditional triple therapy with bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline or amoxicillin (BMT/A) only partially overcomes metronidazole resistance. However, the addition of a PPI to bismuth triple therapy largely overcomes established metronidazole resistance if treatment is given for at least one week or more. When RBC rather than PPI is used with clarithromycin, this dual regimen appears to be more effective in preventing the development of secondary clarithromycin resistance. The triple combination of RBC, metronidazole and clarithromycin appears to be effective against metronidazole resistant strains of H pylori. Thus, overall, there is some evidence that bismuth compounds may prevent the development of antibiotic resistance and that existing antibiotic resistance may at least be partially overcome in vitro and in vivo. With the growing emergence of H pylori resistance to metronidazole and clarithromycin, further research to clarify the role of bismuth compounds is required.
Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie 12/2000; 14(10):885-9. · 1.21 Impact Factor
-
S J Veldhuyzen van Zanten,
N Flook, N Chiba,
D Armstrong,
A Barkun,
M Bradette,
A Thomson,
F Bursey,
P Blackshaw,
D Frail,
P Sinclair
Canadian Medical Association Journal 10/2000; 163(6):696. · 8.22 Impact Factor
-
Canadian family physician Médecin de famille canadien 10/2000; 46:1732-4. · 1.41 Impact Factor
-
S J Veldhuyzen van Zanten,
N Flook, N Chiba,
D Armstrong,
A Barkun,
M Bradette,
A Thomson,
F Bursey,
P Blackshaw,
D Frail,
P Sinclair
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To provide Canadian primary care physicians with an evidence-based clinical management tool, including diagnostic and treatment recommendations, for patients who present with uninvestigated dyspepsia.
The management tool has 5 key decision steps addressing the following: (1) evidence that symptoms originate in the upper gastrointestinal tract, (2) presence of alarm features, (3) use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), (4) dominant reflux symptoms and (5) evidence of Helicobacter pylori infection. All patients over 50 years of age who present with new-onset dyspepsia and patients who present with alarm features should receive prompt investigation, preferably by endoscopy. The management options for patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia who use NSAIDs regularly are: (1) to stop NSAID therapy and assess symptomatic response, (2) to treat with NSAID prophylaxis if NSAID therapy cannot be stopped or (3) to refer for investigation. Gastroesophageal reflux disease can be diagnosed clinically if the patient's dominant symptoms are heartburn or acid regurgitation, or both; these patients should be treated with acid suppressive therapy. The remaining patients should be tested for H. pylori infection, and those with a positive result should be treated with H. pylori-eradication therapy. Those with a negative result should have their symptoms treated with optimal antisecretory therapy or a prokinetic agent. VALIDATION AND EVIDENCE: Evidence for resolution of the dyspepsia symptoms was the main outcome measure. Supporting evidence for the 5 steps in the management tool and the recommendations for treatment were graded according to the strength of the evidence and were endorsed by consensus of committee members. If no randomized controlled clinical trials were available, the recommendations were based on the best available evidence.
Evidence was obtained from MEDLINE searches for pertinent articles published from 1966 to October 1999. The searches focused on dyspepsia, diagnosis and treatment. Additional articles were retrieved through a manual search of bibliographies and abstracts from international gastroenterology conferences.
Canadian Medical Association Journal 07/2000; 162(12 Suppl):S3-23. · 8.22 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In-depth meetings of the XIth International Workshop on Gastroduodenal Pathology and Helicobacter pylori led to the presentation and discussion of extensive new data on H. pylori and its diseases. The mode of transmission of H. pylori remains unclear, and it remains unknown why only a small proportion of infected individuals develop duodenal or gastric ulcer disease and even fewer develop gastric cancer. The role of H. pylori eradication in persons with uninvestigated dyspepsia remains controversial. New clinical trials of H. pylori treatment show symptom relief and improvement in the quality of life of persons with functional dyspepsia, especially in those with ulcer-like or reflux-like dyspepsia. Clearly the move is toward symptom-based management of persons with dyspepsia, with fewer endoscopies being needed in the otherwise healthy young dyspeptic patients. It remains controversial whether eradicating H. pylori in duodenal ulcer or functional dyspepsia increases the risk of subsequent development of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The one-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple regimens remain the gold standard of H. pylori therapy, but some of the ranitidine bismuth citrate plus two antibiotic regimens also achieve an 80% H. pylori eradication rate on an intention-to-treat basis. While the urea breath test remains the noninvasive test of choice, interesting new data are available on the use of stool antigen testing to diagnose H. pylori infection. The number of H pylori-associated gastroduodenal diseases grows to include possible liver, vascular, immune and skin conditions.
Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie 04/2000; 14(3):188-98. · 1.21 Impact Factor
-
Canadian Medical Association Journal 03/2000; 162(3):371-2. · 8.22 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Triple therapy for one week with omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole (OCM) is accepted worldwide as a first line therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. It is unclear whether omeprazole needs to be given once or twice daily.
To assess the efficacy and safety of these regimens in a single-centre, Canadian practice.
Histologically proven H pylori-positive patients were treated for seven days with clarithromycin 250 mg bid and metronidazole 500 mg bid, and randomly allocated to omeprazole 20 mg either once or twice daily in this open, cohort study. Endoscopy with histology (two antrum and two body biopsies, Giemsa stain) was done four weeks or longer after the pills were completed to assess H pylori eradication.
Whether omeprazole was given once or twice daily, eradication was high and the same in both arms. All-patients-treated eradication was 85% (39 of 46 in the omeprazole once daily group and 41 of 48 in the omeprazole twice daily group) and intent-to-treat eradication was 80% (39 of 49 in the omeprazole once daily group and 41 of 51 in the omeprazole twice daily group). Side effects were frequently seen, suffered by 65% to 69% of patients treated. However, these were mild and compliance was high, with 94% of patients taking all of their pills. Mild side effects included loose stools, taste disturbance, nausea, headache and upper or lower gastrointestinal gas. Only one patient (1%) from the omeprazole once daily arm stopped taking metronidazole due to excessive perspiring.
In this community practice, OCM triple therapy was effective whether omeprazole was given once or twice daily. For those with financial constraint, omeprazole 20 mg once daily can be considered. The regimens were well tolerated without serious adverse events.
Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie 02/2000; 14(1):27-31. · 1.21 Impact Factor
