J Wasson

Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH, USA

Are you J Wasson?

Claim your profile

Publications (11)100.64 Total impact

  • Article: Effect of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer on patient quality of life: results from a Medicare survey.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess patient responses to radical prostatectomy and its effects. A national sample was taken of 1072 Medicare patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (1988 through 1990) by mail, telephone, and personal interviews. The effects of the surgery and its complications on these patients' lives were studied through: (1) patient ratings of the extent to which sexual and urinary dysfunctions were "problems" in their lives; (2) two general measures of quality of life, the Mental Health Index and the General Health Index; (3) patient reports of how they felt about the results of treatment and whether they would choose surgery again. On average, dripping urine, particularly to the point where subjects were wearing pads, had a more significant effect on patients than loss of sexual function; incontinence had significant adverse effects on the measures of quality of life and self-reported results of surgery. Overall, postsurgical patients scored comparatively high on the quality of life measures (similar to a cohort of patients with benigh prostatic hyperplasia who had undergone transurethral resection of the prostate), reported feeling positive about the results (81%), and would choose surgical treatment again (89%). Nonetheless, there was variability in patient response to the effects of surgery. The results demonstrate the ability of many Medicare patients to adapt to adverse outcomes, such as loss of sexual function and incontinence. They also provide evidence of the variability of individual patients' responses to surgical results and reinforce the importance of individualized decision making for patients facing a decision about radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Urology 07/1995; 45(6):1007-13; discussion 1013-5. · 2.43 Impact Factor
  • Article: Patient-reported complications and follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy. The National Medicare Experience: 1988-1990 (updated June 1993).
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To estimate the probabilities of complications and follow-up treatment, a sample of Medicare patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (1988 through 1990) was surveyed by mail, telephone, and personal interview. Respondents reported their current status with respect to continence and sexual function as well as post-surgical treatments they had had to treat residual or recurrent cancer or surgical complications. Over 30 percent reported currently wearing pads or clamps to deal with wetness; over 40 percent said they drip urine when they cough or when their bladders are full; 23 percent reported daily wetting of more than a few drops. About 60 percent of patients reported having no full or partial erections since their surgery, and only 11 percent had any erections sufficient for intercourse during the month prior to the survey. Six percent had surgery after the radical prostatectomy to treat incontinence; 15 percent had treatments or used devices to help with sexual function; 20 percent report having had post-surgical treatment for urethral strictures. In addition 16 percent, 22 percent, and 28 percent reported follow-up treatment for cancer (radiation or androgen deprivation therapy) at two, three, and four years after radical prostatectomy. These estimates of complication and follow-up treatment rates are generally higher, and almost certainly more representative for older men, than estimates previously published. Patients and physicians may want to weight heavily the complications and need for follow-up treatments when considering radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Urology 01/1994; 42(6):622-9. · 2.43 Impact Factor
  • Article: An assessment of radical prostatectomy. Time trends, geographic variation, and outcomes. The Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine temporal trends and geographic variation in radical prostatectomy rates and short-term outcomes. Population-based study of radical prostatectomy for the years 1984 through 1990. Poisson regression was used to estimate temporal and regional effects. The 50 states and the District of Columbia. A 20% national sample of male Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older. Rate of radical prostatectomy; 30-day mortality; and major cardiopulmonary complications, vascular complications, or surgical repairs within 30 days of radical prostatectomy. A total of 10,598 radical prostatectomies were identified. The adjusted rate of radical prostatectomy in 1990 was 5.75 times that in 1984. The relative increase was similar in all age groups. Substantial geographic variation existed in rates from 1988 through 1990: all states in the New England and Mid-Atlantic regions had rates equal to or below 60 per 100,000 male Medicare beneficiaries, while all states in the Pacific and Mountain regions had rates equal to or above 130 per 100,000. The mortality and morbidity after radical prostatectomy are not trivial for older men (aged 75 years and older)--almost 2% died and nearly 8% suffered major cardiopulmonary complications within 30 days of the operation. The sharp increase and wide geographic variation in radical prostatectomy rates make the evaluation of this surgical procedure a pressing issue. The rising rate of radical prostatectomy among men aged 75 years and older merits special attention.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 06/1993; 269(20):2633-6. · 30.03 Impact Factor
  • Article: The treatment of localized prostate cancer: what are we doing, what do we know, and what should we be doing? The Prostate Patient Outcome Research Team.
    Seminars in urology 03/1993; 11(1):23-6.
  • Article: Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment in ambulatory settings. The clinician's point of view. The Dartmouth Primary Care COOP Project.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the past decade physicians have identified the need to expand patient assessment to include global function and quality of life. During the same period, the busy clinic has evolved into the location where this assessment seems most appropriate. Integrating functional health assessment into a busy clinical practice is difficult because the necessary steps require time, thought, recording, and follow-up. Attention to the office ecosystem is very important before any patient care management method is introduced. The clinician must transform the results of health status screening into a specific functional diagnosis. The clinician has to understand the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the measure for a preliminary diagnosis to be made. Often, additional measurements must be taken to establish a specific diagnosis. These steps encompass assessment linkage. Once the specific cause for the dysfunction is recognized, the clinician then has to determine the need for special resources. This is called the resource linkage. By following the steps outlined in this paper, the clinician should be able to overcome many obstacles for functional health status assessment in busy ambulatory settings.
    Medical Care 06/1992; 30(5 Suppl):MS42-9. · 3.41 Impact Factor
  • Article: The short-term effect of patient health status assessment in a health maintenance organization.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was designed to test the short-term effects of health assessment on the process of care and patient satisfaction. The 29 Chart physicians used the Dartmouth COOP Charts to measure their adult patients' health status during a single clinical encounter; the 27 control clinicians used no measure of health status. We compared the change between baseline and post-intervention information for a sample of all study clinicians' patients. Most of the patients were female (67%), well educated (70% had at least a college education) and young (approximately 90% were aged 59 years or younger). We found that the ordering of tests and procedures for women was increased by exposure to the COOP Charts (52% vs. 35%; p < 0.01); the effect in men was not as significant (37% vs. 23%: p = 0.06). Although women reported no change in satisfaction with care, men claimed that the clinician helped in the management of pain (p = 0.02). We conclude that the use of health status measures during a single clinical encounter in an HMO changes clinician test ordering behaviour and may improve the help male patients receive for pain conditions. The long-term impact of these management changes is not known.
    Quality of Life Research 05/1992; 1(2):99-106. · 2.30 Impact Factor
  • Article: Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Randomized trial. A primary care clinic. Four hundred ninety-seven men aged 54 years or older. We examined the hypothesis that substituting clinician-initiated telephone calls (telephone care) for some clinic visits would reduce medical care utilization without adversely affecting patient health. Clinicians were asked to double their recommended interval for face-to-face follow-up and schedule three intervening telephone contacts; for control patients, the follow-up interval recommended by their clinician was unchanged. Use of medical services and health status. During the 2-year follow-up period, 7% of patients withdrew or became unavailable. Telephone-care patients had fewer total clinic visits, scheduled and unscheduled, than usual-care patients (19%, P less than .001). In addition, telephone-care patients had less medication use (14%, P = .006), fewer admissions, and shorter stays in the hospital (28% fewer total hospital days, P = .005), and 41% fewer intensive care unit days (P = .03). Estimated total expenditures for telephone care were 28% less per patient for the 2 years ($1656, P = .004). For the subgroup of patients with fair or poor overall health at the beginning of the study (n = 180), savings were somewhat greater ($1976, P = .01). In this subgroup, improvement in physical function from baseline (P = .02) and a possible reduction in mortality (P = .06) were also observed. We conclude that substituting telephone care for selected clinic visits significantly reduces utilization of medical services. For more severely ill patients, the increased contact made possible by telephone care may also improve health status and reduce mortality.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 05/1992; 267(13):1788-93. · 30.03 Impact Factor
  • Article: Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The COOP Project, a primary care research network, has begun development of a Chart method to screen function quickly. The COOP Charts, analogous to Snellen Charts, were pretested in two practices on adult patients (N = 117) to test feasibility, clinical utility, and validity. Patients completed questionnaires containing validated health status scales and sociodemographic variables. Practice staff filled out forms indicating COOP Chart scores and clinical data. We held debriefing interviews with staff who administered the Charts. The results indicate the Charts take 1-2 minutes to administer, are easy to use, and produce important clinical data. The patterns of correlations between the Charts and validity indicator variables provide evidence for both convergent and discriminant validity. We conclude that new measures are needed to assess function in a busy office practice and that the COOP Chart system represents one promising strategy.
    Journal of Chronic Diseases 02/1987; 40 Suppl 1:55S-69S.
  • Article: Chief complaint fatigue: a longitudinal study from the patient's perspective.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fatigue is one of the 10 most common reasons for visiting a physician. Yet little is known about its course or impact, from the patient's perspective, on quality of life or utilization of medical care. The Dartmouth COOP Project, a primary care research network, conducted a one-year prospective study comparing chief complaint fatigue (CCF) patients with two age/sex matched comparison groups (N = 243). Results show that almost 67% of the CCF patients improved over one year; however, they had much higher utilization rates and substantial limitations in physical and emotional function. Fatigue was associated with physical symptoms and interference with many aspects of daily life. We conclude that fatigue has a powerful, adverse effect on quality of life. We hope the findings may help physicians to better understand and treat patients who seek care for fatigue.
    The Family practice research journal 02/1987; 6(4):175-88.
  • Article: Functional health status levels of primary care patients.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A cross-sectional study was conducted on functional status of adults visiting primary care practices. Limitations in physical and mental function were assessed independently in 28 practices by patients (N = 1,227) and physicians (N = 47) using a simple global index of disability. Results indicated 12% of patients rated their physical limitations as major and 8% rated major emotional limitations during the past month. Comparable assessments by physicians were 5% and 4%, respectively. Differences between patients and physicians were statistically significant and are demonstrated to be clinically relevant. Patients' functional limitations were associated with increased utilization of ambulatory care, older age, lower level of education, unemployment, and a primary diagnosis of a chronic condition. We conclude that functional status can be routinely recorded in medical practice to help describe severity, predict utilization, and improve the physician-patient relationship.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 07/1983; 249(24):3331-8. · 30.03 Impact Factor
  • Article: The treatment of localized prostate cancer: what are we doing, what do we know, and what should we be doing? The Prostate Patient Outcome Research Team
    Semin Urol. 11(1):23-6.