-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To compare the efficacy of in situ replacement with rifampicin-soaked silver-coated polyester (RSSCP) to that of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) graft replacements in a porcine model for early aortic prosthetic vascular graft infection (PVGI).
Sixty pigs received polyester or silver-coated grafts with an 8 mm diameter implanted end-to-end in the infrarenal aorta, and the grafts were inoculated with approximately 10(6)Staphylococcus aureus. All developed S. aureus PVGI. Two weeks later, the 52 surviving pigs were randomised to undergo in situ graft replacement with ePTFE or RSSCP grafts followed by oral administration of 300 mg rifampicin and 750 mg ciprofloxacin twice a day, postoperatively. After three weeks, all pigs were sacrificed. In situ perigraft swabs and graft material were analysed for S. aureus quantitatively.
Only one out of 25 RSSCP grafts were infected with S. aureus, whereas 15 of 27 ePTFE grafts were infected after 3 weeks (OR = 0.022, 95% CI: 0.002, 0.219, P = 0.001).
In situ replacement with RSSCP grafts and oral rifampicin plus ciprofloxacin is more efficiency in eradicating S. aureus PVGI than ePTFE grafts treated with same oral antibiotics in a porcine aortic PVGI model.
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery 03/2012; 43(5):582-7. · 2.92 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In a prospective, controlled, double-blind study, 496 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were given antibiotic prophylaxis with a single dose of either ceftriaxone or ampicillin + metronidazole. No significant intergroup difference was found between the respective overall rates of infectious complications (3.2% and 4.9%). Analysis of the microbiologic findings showed incisional wound infections, mainly caused by gram-negative rods, to be more common in the ampicillin-metronidazole group, whereas deep wound infections were more frequent in the ceftriaxone group. It is concluded that ceftriaxone seems to be more efficient than ampicillin-metronidazole as prophylaxis against incisional wound infection, but should preferably be supplemented with an antianaerobic agent to prevent deep wound infections.
The European Journal of Surgery 02/1991; 157(1):45-9.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In a prospective, open, controlled clinical study, 190 consecutive patients who were thought to have bacterial peritonitis before operation, were randomised to antibiotic treatment during and after operation with either ceftriaxone 1 g plus metronidazole 1.5 g once daily (n = 94) or ampicillin 2 g plus netilmicin 150 mg twice daily plus metronidazole 1.5 g once daily (n = 96). Incisional and deep surgical wound infections, postoperative pneumonia and urinary tract infection as well as deaths caused by infection were recorded. Ceftriaxone-metronidazole was significantly more effective than ampicillin-netilmicin-metronidazole, 6/94 wound related infections (6%) compared to 18/96 (19%) (p = 0.02). In patients with peritonitis caused by a perforated colon or appendix the rates of clinical failure were 6% and 28%, respectively. We consider ceftriaxone plus metronidazole an efficient and easily administered antibiotic regimen in patients with bacterial peritonitis, and both the wide range of activity against Gram-negative aerobic rods and the long half life of ceftriaxone seem to be beneficial.
The European Journal of Surgery 157(6-7):397-401.
