-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) may be beneficial but the mechanisms of action are undetermined.
To investigate the effects of non-synchronised NIPPV on spontaneous breathing in premature infants.
10 infants receiving ventilator generated non-synchronised NIPPV were studied for 30 min. Delivered pressure was measured at the nose; respiration was recorded using respiratory inductance plethysmography. Oxygen saturation, carbon dioxide, heart rate, inspired oxygen and video images were recorded.
Median gestational age, birth weight, age and study weight were 25(+3) weeks, 797 g, 24 days and 1076 g. When the NIPPV pressure peak commenced during spontaneous inspiration the inspiratory time increased by 21% (p=0.002), relative tidal volume increased by 15% (p=0.01) and expiratory time was unchanged. When the NIPPV pressure peak commenced during spontaneous expiration the expiratory time increased by 13% (p=0.04). NIPPV pressures delivered during apnoea (range 8-28 cm H(2)O) produced chest inflation 5% of the time, resulting in small tidal volumes (26.7% of spontaneous breath size) but reduced oxygen desaturation. NIPPV pressure peaks occurred throughout spontaneous respiration proportional to the inspiratory: expiratory ratio.
NIPPV pressure peaks only resulted in a small increase in relative tidal volumes when delivered during spontaneous inspiration. During apnoea pressure peaks occasionally resulted in chest inflation, which ameliorated oxygen desaturations. Infants did not become entrained with the NIPPV pressure changes. Synchronising every rise in applied pressure with spontaneous inspiration may increase the effectiveness of NIPPV and warrants investigation.
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 02/2011; 96(6):F422-8. · 3.05 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The normal range of heart rate (HR) in the first minutes after birth has not been defined. Objective To describe the HR changes of healthy newborn infants in the delivery room (DR) detected by pulse oximetry. Study Design All inborn infants were eligible and included if a member of the research team attended the birth. Infants were excluded if they received any form of medical intervention in the DR including supplemental oxygen, or respiratory support. HR was measured using a pulse oximeter (PO) with the sensor applied to the right hand or wrist immediately after birth. PO data (oxygen saturation, HR and signal quality) were downloaded every 2 sec and analysed only when the signal had no alarm messages (low IQ signal, low perfusion, sensor off, ambient light). Results Data from 468 infants with 61 650 data points were included. Infants had a mean (range) gestational age of 38 (25-42) weeks and birth weight 2970 (625-5135) g. At 1 min the median (IQR) HR was 96 (65-127) beats per min (bpm) rising at 2 min and 5 min to 139 (110-166) bpm and 163 (146-175) bpm respectively. In preterm infants, the HR rose more slowly than term infants. Conclusions The median HR was <100 bpm at 1 min after birth. After 2 min it was uncommon to have a HR <100 bpm. In preterm infants and those born by caesarean section the HR rose more slowly than term vaginal births.
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 05/2010; 95(3):F177-81. · 3.05 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Pulse oximetry is commonly used to assist clinicians in assessment and management of newly born infants in the delivery room (DR). In many DRs, pulse oximetry is now the standard of care for managing high risk infants, enabling immediate and dynamic assessment of oxygenation and heart rate. However, there is little evidence that using pulse oximetry in the DR improves short and long term outcomes. We review the current literature on using pulse oximetry to measure oxygen saturation and heart rate and how to apply current evidence to management in the DR.
Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 04/2010; 15(4):203-7. · 3.91 Impact Factor
-
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 02/2007; 92(1):F4-7. · 3.05 Impact Factor
