-
Christopher A. Maxwell,
Javier Benítez,
Laia Gómez-Baldó,
Ana Osorio,
Núria Bonifaci,
Ricardo Fernández-Ramires,
Sylvain V. Costes,
Elisabet Guinó,
Helen Chen,
Gareth J. R. Evans, [......],
Stephen B. Gruber,
Conxi Lázaro,
Gabriel Capellá,
Lesley McGuffog,
Katherine L. Nathanson,
Antonis C. Antoniou,
Georgia Chenevix-Trench,
Markus C. Fleisch,
Víctor Moreno,
Miguel Angel Pujana
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Differentiated mammary epithelium shows apicobasal polarity, and loss of tissue organization is an early hallmark of breast carcinogenesis. In BRCA1 mutation carriers, accumulation of stem and progenitor cells in normal breast tissue and increased risk of developing tumors of basal-like type suggest that BRCA1 regulates stem/progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation. However, the function of BRCA1 in this process and its link to carcinogenesis remain unknown. Here we depict a molecular mechanism involving BRCA1 and RHAMM that regulates apicobasal polarity and, when perturbed, may increase risk of breast cancer. Starting from complementary genetic analyses across families and populations, we identified common genetic variation at the low-penetrance susceptibility HMMR locus (encoding for RHAMM) that modifies breast cancer risk among BRCA1, but probably not BRCA2, mutation carriers: n = 7,584, weighted hazard ratio (wHR) = 1.09 (95% CI 1.02–1.16), ptrend = 0.017; and n = 3,965, wHR = 1.04 (95% CI 0.94–1.16), ptrend = 0.43; respectively. Subsequently, studies of MCF10A apicobasal polarization revealed a central role for BRCA1 and RHAMM, together with AURKA and TPX2, in essential reorganization of microtubules. Mechanistically, reorganization is facilitated by BRCA1 and impaired by AURKA, which is regulated by negative feedback involving RHAMM and TPX2. Taken together, our data provide fundamental insight into apicobasal polarization through BRCA1 function, which may explain the expanded cell subsets and characteristic tumor type accompanying BRCA1 mutation, while also linking this process to sporadic breast cancer through perturbation of HMMR/RHAMM.
PLoS Biology 11/2011; 9(11). · 11.45 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Many missense variants in BRCA1 are of unclear clinical significance. Functional and genetic approaches have been proposed for elucidating the clinical significance of such variants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate BRCA1 missense variants for their effect on both homologous recombination (HR) and non homologous end joining (NHEJ). HR frequency evaluation: HeLaG1 cells, containing a stably integrated plasmid that allows us to measure HR events by gene conversion events, were transfected with the pcDNA3β expression vector containing the BRCA1-wild-type (BRCA1 wild type) or the BRCA1-unclassified variants (BRCA1-UCVs). The NHEJ was measured by a random plasmid integration assay. The assays suggested a BRCA1 involvement mainly in the NHEJ. As a matter of fact, the Y179C and the A1789T variant significantly altered the NHEJ activity as compared to the wild type, suggesting that they may be related to BRCA1-associated pathogenicity by affecting this function. The variants N550H and I1766S, and the mutation M1775R did not alter the NHEJ frequency. These data, besides proposing a method for the study of BRCA1 variants' effect on HR and NHEJ, highlighted the need for a range of functional assays to be performed to identify variants with altered function.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 01/2011; 125(1):265-72. · 4.43 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Rare germline monoallelic mutations in PALB2 confer a relative risk of breast cancer of 2 to 4-times. To better define the role of PALB2 in breast cancer susceptibility in Italian breast or breast-ovarian cancer families we screened 95 index cases negative for BRCA1/BRCA2 germline mutations. The mutational analysis of the PALB2 gene in a index case of an high risk breast cancer family, has identified a frameshift mutation (c.1517delG) in the exon 4 that leads to the formation of a stop codon, 12 residues downstream of the mutation (Leu451X). The mutation was identified in a woman 52 year old with an infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma and in two of the three sisters without breast cancer. Our results confirmed that PALB2 could be a susceptibility gene for familial breast cancer also in Italian population.
Familial Cancer 12/2010; 9(4):531-6. · 1.30 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Germline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) confer high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancers. Even though most BRCA1 cancer-predisposing mutations produce a non-functional truncated protein, 5-10% of them cause single amino acid substitutions. This second type of mutations represents a useful tool for examining BRCA1 molecular functions. Human BRCA1 inhibits cell proliferation in transformed Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells and this effect is abolished by disease-associated mutations in the BRCT domain. Moreover, BRCA1 mutations located both inside and outside the BRCT domain may induce an increase in the homologous recombination frequency in yeast cells. Here we present a microarray analysis of gene expression induced in yeast cells transformed with five BRCA1 missense variants, in comparison with gene expression induced by wild-type BRCA1. Data analysis was performed by grouping the BRCA1 variants into three sets: Recombination (R)-set (Y179C and S1164I), Recombination and Proliferation (RP)-set (I1766S and M1775R) and Proliferation (P)-set (A1789T), according to their effects on yeast cell phenotype. We found 470, 740 and 1136 differentially expressed genes in R-, P- and RP-set, respectively. Our results point to some molecular mechanisms critical for the control of cell proliferation and of genome integrity providing support to a possible pathogenic role of the analysed mutations. They also confirm that yeast, despite the absence of a BRCA1 homologue, represents a valid model system to examine BRCA1 molecular functions, as the molecular pathways activated by BRCA1 variants are conserved in humans.
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 07/2009; 45(12):2187-96. · 4.12 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BRCA1-interacting protein 1 (BRIP1; FANCJ/BACH1), which encodes a DNA helicase that interacts with BRCA1, has been suggested to be a low-penetrance breast cancer predisposing gene. We aimed to assess whether BRIP1 mutations contribute to breast cancer susceptibility in our population and, if so, to investigate the effect of such mutation(s) on BRIP1 function.
A series of 49 breast/ovarian cancer families, devoid of a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation, were screened for BRIP1 mutations. Functional analyses, including coimmunoprecipitation and stability assays, were employed to further characterize a previously unreported variant.
Five sequence alterations were identified, of which four had been already described. Herein, we report a novel BRIP1 germ-line mutation identified in a woman with early-onset breast cancer. The mutation consists of a 4-nucleotide deletion (c.2992-2995delAAGA) in BRIP1 exon 20 that causes a shift in the reading frame, disrupts the BRCA1-binding domain of BRIP1, and creates a premature stop codon. Functional analysis of the recombinant mutant protein in transfected cells showed that the truncation interferes with the stability of the protein and with its ability to interact with BRCA1. Loss of the wild-type BRIP1 allele with retention of the mutated one was observed in the patient's breast tumor tissue.
These results, by showing that the newly identified BRIP1 c.2992-2995delAAGA mutation is associated with instability and functional impairment of the encoded protein, provide further evidence of a breast cancer-related role for BRIP1.
Clinical Cancer Research 07/2008; 14(14):4672-80. · 7.74 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BARD1 (BRCA1-associated RING domain) is the dominant binding partner of BRCA1 in vivo. The BARD1 gene has been reported to be mutated in a subset of breast and ovarian cancer patients and BARD1 germ-line mutations have been identified in breast cancer patients negative for BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene alterations. In the present study, we show by RT-PCR and direct sequencing analysis the occurrence of seven novel and one previously identified BARD1 splicing variants in human lymphocytes and breast cancers. Two of the eight variants (BARD1delta and BARD1 DeltaRIN) preserve a correct open reading frame and could encode BARD1 internally deleted proteins, while the remaining six variants display premature stop codons. Characterization of the relative expression of BARD1 FL, BARD1delta, and BARD1 DeltaRIN using quantitative PCR analysis indicated that the mean expression levels of BARD1 FL, BARD1delta, and BARD1 DeltaRIN were significantly higher in tumors than in morphologically normal tissues and lymphocytes. However, we were unable to identify either qualitatively or quantitatively tumor-specific expression patterns of the identified BARD1 splicing variants.
Genes Chromosomes and Cancer 10/2007; 46(9):791-5. · 3.31 Impact Factor
-
Grazia Lombardi,
Claudio Di Cristofano,
Alessandra Capodanno,
Maria Carla Iorio,
Paolo Aretini,
Patrizia Isola,
Mariella Tancredi,
Paola Collecchi,
Antonio Giuseppe Naccarato,
Romana Prosperi Porta,
Generoso Bevilacqua,
Maria Adelaide Caligo
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BRMS1 is regarded as a metastasis suppressor gene for its ability to reduce metastatic potential of human and murine breast cancer cells as well as human melanoma cells. However, BRMS1 association to human tumor progression is not clearly understood. In the present study we analyzed BRMS1 mRNA expression in tumor progression and its potential prognostic value for breast carcinoma. BRMS1 mRNA expression level was quantified by real-time PCR in 47 tumoral, in 14 peritumoral and in 15 metastatic microdissected cellular populations from 47 breast cancer patients with 10-year follow up. We found BRMS1 expression to be higher in carcinoma cells than in matching normal epithelial cell populations in 10 out of 14 cases (p = 0.0005), while lymph-nodal carcinoma cells showed lower BRMS1 expression in 9 out of 15 cases (p = 0.001). Using both in vivo (human mammary breast carcinomas) and in vitro systems (breast cancer cell lines) we were able to demonstrate that BRMS1 overexpression was not a bias effect induced by cell proliferation rate. BRMS1 expression levels did not correlate with standard breast cancer prognostic factors but BRMS1 higher expression was associated with patient shorter disease-free and overall survival. Our findings are apparently inconsistent with the concept of BRMS1 as a metastasis suppressor gene. One possible explanation is that epithelial cells increase their BRMS1 expression as a compensatory response to tumor formation or metastasis progression, which is elevated in proportion to tumor aggressiveness, whereas those cells of the primary tumor that cannot upregulate BRMS1 escape to form metastasis.
International Journal of Cancer 04/2007; 120(6):1169-78. · 5.44 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Alterations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes account for a large proportion of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. Mutations and variants of unknown pathological significance have been identified in both genes; however, most of them have been studied only at the genomic level, and their effect on mRNA expression remains unknown. We identified two BRCA1 and six BRCA2 splice site variants, and one BRCA2 alteration at exon 14. Our aim was to ascertain the effect on RNA processing of the variants still unclassified. We found that BRCA1 c.IVS11 + 1G>A, BRCA2 c.7252_7272delinsTG, BRCA2 c.IVS2 + 1G>A, BRCA2 c.IVS13-2A>G, BRCA2 c.IVS21 + 4A>G, and BRCA2 c.9345G>A lead to aberrant transcripts in lymphocytes. Five of these six splice site variants caused a complete inactivation of the mutant allele because they produced frameshift similar to previously described deleterious exonic variants. Therefore, we consider them to be true deleterious mutations, possibly associated with an increased lifetime risk of breast or ovarian cancer. BRCA1 c.IVS17 + 6C>G, BRCA2 c.IVS12-9del4, and BRCA2 IVS1-9del3 represent rare variants, not disrupting normal mRNA processing. The last two BRCA2 genetic variants had not been reported in the Breast Cancer Information Core BIC database.
Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 10/2006; 170(2):93-101. · 1.39 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Germ-line mutations in the BRCA1 gene cause hereditary predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for about 40% of high-risk families. Mutation-screening methods generally focus on genomic DNA and are usually PCR based; they enable the detection of sequence alterations such as point mutations and small deletions and insertions. However, they do not allow the detection of partial or entire exon(s) loss, because the presence of the homologous allele results in a positive PCR signal, giving rise to a false-negative result. Identification of unusual haplotypes in patient samples by an expectation maximization algorithm has recently been suggested as a method for identifying hemizygous regions caused by large intragenic deletions. Using a similar approach, we identified a novel BRCA1 genomic rearrangement in a breast/ovarian cancer family negative at the first mutation screening; we detected a deletion encompassing exons 14-19, probably due to replication slippage between Alu sequences.
European Journal of HumanGenetics 10/2004; 12(9):775-7. · 4.40 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The single base substitution mediated by chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotide is a new promising approach of gene therapy for single base mutation diseases. We exploited this approach to render HeLa cells resistant to ouabain by introducing a single base substitution in the alpha 1 subunit of the NA+/K+ ATPase human gene. The chimeric oligonucleotide was administered to HeLa cells by electroporation and the frequency of ouabain resistant cells determined. The results showed that the chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotide failed to enhance the frequency of ouabain resistant cells supporting the controversy about the conflicting results of the technique.
Nucleosides Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids 21(11-12):775-84. · 0.90 Impact Factor
