-
Donglei Hu,
Ludmila Pawlikowska,
Alka Kanaya,
Wen-Chi Hsueh,
Lisa Colbert,
Anne B Newman,
Suzanne Satterfield, Clifford Rosen,
Steven R Cummings,
Tamara B Harris,
Elad Ziv
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the relationship between serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), IGF-1 binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1), and IGF-1 binding protein 2 (IGFBP-2) and fasting insulin, fasting glucose, adiposity, and mortality in older adults.
A prospective cohort study with mean follow-up of 6.2 years.
Participants were recruited and followed at two centers affiliated with academic medical institutions.
Six hundred twenty-five men and women aged 70 and older and in good health at the time of enrollment.
Serum IGF-1, IGFBP-1, and IGFBP-2; fasting serum insulin; fasting serum glucose; visceral fat; and total percent fat.
Higher IGFBP-1 and higher IGFBP-2 were significantly associated with lower fasting insulin, lower fasting glucose, and lower adiposity, but higher IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 were associated with greater mortality. In multivariate adjusted models, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 1.48 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.14-1.92) per standard deviation (SD) increase in IGFBP-2 and 1.34 (95% CI=1.01-1.76) per SD increase in IGFBP-1. No association was found between IGF-1 and all-cause mortality.
Higher IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 are associated with lower adiposity and decreased glucose tolerance but also with greater all-cause mortality. Higher levels of serum IGF-1 binding protein (IGFBP) may indicate greater IGF-1 activity and thus represent an association between higher IGF-1 activity and mortality in humans.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 08/2009; 57(7):1213-8. · 3.74 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: IGF-I plays an important anabolic role in stimulating bone formation and maintaining bone mass. We show that the pro-proliferative, anti-apoptotic, and functional responses to IGF-I in bone and BMSCs decrease with aging. These changes are associated with impaired receptor activation and signal transduction through the MAPK and PI3K pathways.
IGF-I is a potent anabolic agent having effects across diverse tissues and cell types. With aging, bone becomes resistant to the anabolic actions of IGF-I. To examine the effects of aging on bone responsiveness to IGF-I, we measured the pro-proliferative, anti-apoptotic, and functional responses of bone and bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) to IGF-I and evaluated IGF-I signal transduction in young, adult, and old mice.
Male C57BL/6 mice 6 wk (young), 6 mo (adult), and 24 mo (old) were treated with IGF-I for 2 wk using osmotic minipumps, and osteoblast proliferation (BrdU labeling) in vivo, and osteoprogenitor number (BMSC culture and calcium nodule formation) were measured. Proliferation, apoptosis, and expression of key osteoblast factors (alkaline phosphatase, collagen, osteocalcin, RANKL, osteoprotegerin (OPG), macrophage-colony stimulating factor [M-CSF]) and IGF-I signaling elements and their activation in IGF-I-treated cells were studied using QRT-PCR and Western blot analysis. Data were analyzed using ANOVA.
Aging decreased the basal and IGF-I-stimulated number of BrdU-labeled osteoblasts and reduced the ability of IGF-I to stimulate osteoprogenitor formation (calcium nodule number) by 50%. The pro-proliferative and anti-apoptotic actions of IGF-I were blunted in cells from old animals. These changes were accompanied by age-related alterations in the ability of IGF-I to regulate alkaline phosphatase, collagen, osteocalcin, RANKL, OPG, and M-CSF expression. IGF-I binding was normal, but IGF-I receptor mRNA and protein expression was increased in aged animals by 2- and 10-fold, respectively. The age-related changes in proliferation, apoptosis, and function were accompanied by loss of IGF-I-induced signaling at the receptor level and at key regulatory sites along the MAPK (ERK1/2) and PI3K (AKT) pathways.
Our data show that aging is accompanied by loss of bone and BMSC/osteoblast responsiveness to IGF-I and that these changes are associated with resistance to IGF-I signaling that involve receptor activation and downstream signaling events.
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 09/2007; 22(8):1271-9. · 6.37 Impact Factor
-
Benjamin M Boudignon,
Daniel D Bikle,
Pam Kurimoto,
Hashem Elalieh,
Shigeki Nishida,
Yongmei Wang,
Andrew Burghardt,
Sharmila Majumdar,
Benjamin E Orwoll, Clifford Rosen,
Bernard P Halloran
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: IGF-I stimulates osteoblast proliferation, bone formation, and increases bone volume in normal weight-bearing animals. During skeletal unloading or loss of weight bearing, bone becomes unresponsive to the anabolic effects of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). To determine whether skeletal reloading after a period of unloading increases bone responsiveness to IGF-I, we examined bone structure and formation in response to IGF-I under different loading conditions. Twelve-week-old rats were divided into six groups: loaded (4 wk), unloaded (4 wk), and unloaded/reloaded (2/2 wk), and treated with IGF-I (2.5 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1)) or vehicle during the final 2 wk. Cortical bone formation rate (BFR), cancellous bone volume and architecture in the secondary spongiosa (tibia and vertebrae), and total volume and calcified volume in the primary spongiosa (tibia) were assessed. Periosteal BFR decreased during unloading, remained low during reloading in the vehicle-treated group, but was dramatically increased in IGF-I-treated animals. Cancellous bone volume decreased with unloading and increased with reloading, but the effect was exaggerated in the tibia of IGF-I-treated animals. Total and calcified volumes in the primary spongiosa decreased during unloading in the vehicle-treated animals. IGF-I treatment prevented the loss in volume. These data show that reloading after a period of skeletal unloading increases bone responsiveness to IGF-I, and they suggest that IGF-I may be of therapeutic use in patients who have lost bone as a consequence of prolonged skeletal disuse.
Journal of Applied Physiology 08/2007; 103(1):125-31. · 3.75 Impact Factor
