-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: It has been shown that drugs comprise a group of non-peptide antigens that can be recognized by human T cells in the context of HLA class II and that this recognition is involved in allergic reactions. Recent studies have demonstrated a MHC-restricted but processing- and metabolism-independent pathway for the presentation of allergenic drugs such as lidocaine and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) to drug-specific T cells. However, there is little information so far on the precise molecular mechanisms of this non-covalent drug presentation.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the requirements for a specific peptide occupying the groove of the MHC class II molecule for the efficient presentation of non-covalently bound drugs to CD4+ T cells.
We analysed the effect of coincubation or prepulse of antigen presenting cells (APC) with different peptides on the proliferative responses of SMX-specific CD4+ T cell clones. In a second series of experiments, we eluted HLA-bound peptides from the surface of antigen presenting cells by mild acid treatment. Successful removal of peptides was tested directly using labelled peptides and functionally by monitoring activation and proliferation of peptide-specific T cell clones. Finally, the presentation of SMX to SMX-specific T cell clones before and after elution of MHC class II bound peptides was tested.
We found that neither peptide coincubation nor peptide prepulse of APC altered the proliferative response of SMX-specific T cells. APC treated with the acid for a short time retained cell viability, MHC class II expression and antigen presenting cell function. However, defined peptides could be eluted from surface MHC class II molecules nearly quantitatively. Nevertheless, the chemically non-reactive drug SMX could still be presented to specific T cells independent of the presence of distinct self-peptides.
Our data suggest that small molecules like drugs can bind to a multitude of HLA-bound peptides or that, similar to superantigens, they might bind directly to HLA.
Clinical & Experimental Allergy 12/2002; 32(11):1635-43. · 5.03 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: It has been well established that T cells can recognize small mol. wt compounds such as drugs. Results from previous studies revealing a high heterogeneity and cross-reactivity of drug-specific T cell clones (TCC) in individual patients prompted us to analyze the degeneracy of drug-reactive TCR in detail. Hence, we analyzed the MHC restriction pattern of a panel of 100 drug-specific TCC isolated from different drug-allergic donors. We found that 28 of the tested clones showed an MHC allele-unrestricted drug recognition. Most of these clones were at the same time highly drug specific, i.e. they could only be stimulated by the original drug and not by any drug derivatives. In contrast, TCC with the ability to interact with different drug derivatives displayed a clearly MHC allele-restricted drug recognition. Therefore, we concluded that the TCR of these clones is mainly interacting with side chains of the appropriate drug molecules and hence able to tolerate alterations in the MHC molecule. Moreover, we tested all clones for additional alloreactivity and found that 27 clones could be stimulated by a self-MHC--peptide--drug complex as well as by a non-self-MHC--peptide complex. This cross-reactivity with allogeneic MHC molecules was substantially higher in drug-specific TCC compared to tetanus toxoid-specific clones from the same donors. This suggests that from the point of view of drug-specific TCR, non-self-MHC--peptide complexes have a higher incidence to mimic the 'original' self-MHC--peptide-drug complex and this may occur for TCR recognizing self-MHC--pathogen-derived peptide complexes. Finally, the biological functions of bispecific TCC were not influenced by the nature of the stimulating ligand. Both drug as well as allogeneic stimulation led to similar reaction patterns in the analyzed TCC.
International Immunology 08/2001; 13(7):877-85. · 3.41 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is an uncommon eruption most often provoked by drugs, by acute infections with enteroviruses, or by mercury. It is characterized by acute, extensive formation of nonfollicular sterile pustules on erythematous background, fever, and peripheral blood leukocytosis. We present clinical and immunological data on four patients with this disease, which is caused by different drugs. An involvement of T cells could be implied by positive skin patch tests and lymphocyte transformation tests. Immunohistochemistry revealed a massive cell infiltrate consisting of neutrophils in pustules and T cells in the dermis and epidermis. Expression of the potent neutrophil-attracting chemokine IL-8 was elevated in keratinocytes and infiltrating mononuclear cells. Drug-specific T cells were generated from the blood and skin of three patients, and phenotypic characterization showed a heterogeneous distribution of CD4/CD8 phenotype and of T-cell receptor Vbeta-expression. Analysis of cytokine/chemokine profiles revealed that IL-8 is produced significantly more by drug-specific T cells from patients with AGEP compared with drug-specific T cells from patients that had non-AGEP exanthemas. In conclusion, our data demonstrate the involvement of drug-specific T cells in the pathomechanism of this rather rare and peculiar form of drug allergy. In addition, they indicate that even in some neutrophil-rich inflammatory responses specific T cells are engaged and might orchestrate the immune reaction.
Journal of Clinical Investigation 07/2001; 107(11):1433-41. · 15.39 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Sulphamethoxazole has been associated with the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions. There is controversy as to whether the immune response is metabolism-dependent or -independent. We have therefore investigated the site of antigen formation and the nature of the drug signal presented to the immune system in vivo. Male Wistar rats were dosed with sulphamethoxazole, sulphamethoxazole hydroxylamine or nitroso sulphamethoxazole. Antigen formation on cell surfaces was determined by flow cytometry using a specific anti-sulphamethoxazole antibody. Immunogenicity was determined by assessment of ex vivo T-cell proliferation. Administration of nitroso sulphamethoxazole, but not sulphamethoxazole or sulphamethoxazole hydroxylamine, resulted in antigen formation on the surface of lymphocytes, splenocytes and epidermal keratinocytes, and a strong proliferative response of splenocytes on re-stimulation with nitroso sulphamethoxazole. Rats dosed with sulphamethoxazole or sulphamethoxazole hydroxylamine did not respond to any of the test compounds. CD4+ or CD8+ depleted cells responded equally to nitroso sulphamethoxazole. The proliferative response to nitroso sulphamethoxazole was seen even after pulsing for only 5 min, and was not inhibited by glutathione. Responding cells produced IFN-gamma, but not IL-4. Haptenation of cells by sulphamethoxazole hydroxylamine was seen after depletion of glutathione by pre-treating the rats with diethyl maleate. Splenocytes from the glutathione-depleted sulphamethoxazole hydroxylamine-treated rats responded weakly to nitroso sulphamethoxazole, but not to sulphamethoxazole or sulphamethoxazole hydroxylamine. Dosing of rats with sulphamethoxazole produced a cellular response to nitroso sulphamethoxazole (but not to sulphamethoxazole or its hydroxylamine) when the animals were primed with complete Freund's adjuvant. These studies demonstrate the antigenicity of nitroso sulphamethoxazole in vivo and provide evidence for the role of drug metabolism and cell surface haptenation in the induction of a cellular immune response in the rat.
British Journal of Pharmacology 06/2001; 133(2):295-305. · 4.41 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: 1. Hypersensitivity to the drug sulfamethoxazole (SMX) is thought to be a consequence of bioactivation to the hydroxylamine metabolite (SMX-NHOH) and further oxidation to the ultimate reactive metabolite, nitroso-sulfamethoxazole (SMX-NO). SMX-NO covalently modifies self proteins which in turn might be recognized as neo-antigens by T-cells. The antioxidant glutathione (GSH) is known to protect cells from reactive metabolites by conjugation and subsequent dissociation to SMX-NHOH and/or SMX. 2. To study the reactivity of T-cells to SMX metabolites and their respective role in the generation of drug-specific T-cells, we analysed the effect of GSH on the response of PBMC to SMX and its metabolites SMX-NHOH and SMX-NO. Furthermore, we monitored the proliferative response of drug-specific T-cell clones in the presence or absence of GSH. 3. We found that addition of GSH to peripheral blood mononuclear cells had no effect on the SMX-specific response but enhanced the proliferation to SMX-metabolites. The response of SMX-NO-specific T-cell clones was abrogated when GSH was present during the covalent haptenation of antigen presenting cells (APC). Conversely, SMX-specific T-cell clones gained reactivity through the conversion of SMX-NO to the parent drug by GSH. While GSH had no effect on the initial activation of T-cell clones, it prevented covalent binding to APCs, reduced toxicity and thereby led to proliferation of drug-specific T-cells to non-reactive drug metabolites. 4. Our data support the concept that in allergic individuals T-cells recognize the non-covalently bound parent drug rather than APC covalently modified by SMX-NO.
British Journal of Pharmacology 03/2001; 132(3):623-30. · 4.41 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The recognition of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole (SMX) by T cells is usually explained with the hapten-carrier model. However, recent investigations have revealed a MHC-restricted but processing- and metabolism-independent pathway of drug presentation. This suggested a labile, low-affinity binding of SMX to MHC-peptide complexes on APC. To study the role of covalent vs noncovalent drug presentation in SMX allergy, we analyzed the proliferative response of PBMC and T cell clones from patients with SMX allergy to SMX and its reactive oxidative metabolites SMX-hydroxylamine and nitroso-SMX. Although the great majority of T cell clones were specific for noncovalently bound SMX, PBMC and a small fraction of clones responded to nitroso-SMX-modified cells or were cross-reactive. Rapid down-regulation of TCR expression in T cell clones upon stimulation indicated a processing-independent activation irrespective of specificity for covalently or noncovalently presented Ag. In conclusion, our data show that recognition of SMX presented in covalent and noncovalent bound form is possible by the same TCR but that the former is the exception rather than the rule. The scarcity of cross-reactivity between covalently and noncovalently bound SMX suggests that the primary stimulation may be directed to the noncovalently bound SMX.
The Journal of Immunology 07/2000; 164(12):6647-54. · 5.79 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In recent years the involvement of T cells in allergic reactions to drugs has been well established. However, several molecular aspects of drug recognition by specific T cells remain still unclear. This review will discuss the known pathways of drug presentations by antigen presenting cells, the recognition of MHC/peptide/drug complexes by specific T-cell receptors, and the activation mechanism of drug-specific T cells.
International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 08/1999; 119(3):173-80. · 2.40 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Drugs like sulfamethoxazole (SMX) or lidocaine can be presented to specific human alphabeta+ T cell clones (TCC) by undergoing a noncovalent association with MHC-peptide complexes on HLA-matched APCs. For a better understanding of the molecular basis of the recognition of such drugs by specific TCC, we investigated 1) the fine specificity of the recognizing TCR, 2) the dose-response relationship for the induction of proliferation or cytokine production, and 3) the mechanism of TCR triggering. For that purpose, we tested the reactivity of 11 SMX-specific CD4+ TCC and 2 SMX-specific CD8+ TCC to a panel of 13 different sulfonamide derivatives bearing the same core structure. Five of 13 clones recognized only SMX, while all other clones were responding to as many as 6 different compounds. Some of the compounds needed up to two orders of magnitude higher concentrations than SMX to stimulate TCC, thereby displaying features of weak agonists. Different clones showed clear differences in the minimal drug concentration required for the induction of a proliferative response. Therefore, weaker or stronger agonistic properties were not a characteristic of a given sulfonamide derivative but rather an intrinsic property of the reacting TCR. Finally, the number of down-regulated TCRs was a logarithmic function of the ligand concentration, implicating that specific T cells were activated by serial TCR engagement. Our data demonstrate that, despite the special way of presentation, nonpeptide Ag like drugs appear to interact with the TCR of specific T cells in a similar way as peptide Ags.
The Journal of Immunology 02/1999; 162(1):595-602. · 5.79 Impact Factor
