-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Although white coat hypertension has been widely studied in the last years, its risk profile is not yet completely clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate circulating homocysteine levels, an emerging cardiovascular risk factor, in subjects with white coat and sustained hypertension. We selected 31 sustained hypertensive subjects, 31 white coat hypertensive subjects and 31 normotensive subjects matched for age, gender, body mass index and occupation. Women were also matched for menopausal status. Subjects with smoking habit, dyslipidaemia and diabetes mellitus were excluded from the study. White coat hypertension was defined as clinical hypertension and daytime ambulatory blood pressure <135/85 mmHg. Blood samples were drawn after a fasting period of 12 h for routine laboratory tests and homocysteine determination. Homocysteine levels were evaluated by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Creatinine, glucose, cholesterol and triglycerides were not different among the groups. White coat hypertensive subjects had significantly lower homocysteine levels than sustained hypertensive patients (8.2+/-2.0 vs 12.6+/-3.9 micromol/l, P=0.0003). No significant difference was observed between white coat hypertensive and normotensive subjects regarding this parameter (8.2+/-2.0 vs 7.6+/-1.9 micromol/l, P=0.9). In conclusion, our data show that middle-aged white coat hypertensive subjects without other cardiovascular risk factors have lower circulating homocysteine levels than sustained hypertensive patients suggesting that they are at lower cardiovascular risk.
Journal of Human Hypertension 03/2003; 17(3):165-70. · 2.80 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Sustained and white-coat hypertensives show hypertension in the office setting but different blood pressure values outside the clinical environment. So far, only a few incomplete data on heart rate are available inside and outside the clinical setting in these groups of patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinic and ambulatory heart in sustained hypertensives, white-coat hypertensives and normotensives.
We selected 236 sustained hypertensives, 236 white-coat hypertensives and 236 normotensives matched for age, gender and body mass index, and with a similar occupation. The subjects had been submitted to clinic evaluation and the non-invasive monitoring of blood pressure and heart rate. White-coat hypertension was defined as clinic hypertension and a daytime blood pressure of less than 135/85 mmHg.
The clinic heart rate was significantly higher in sustained hypertensives and white-coat hypertensives than in normotensives (76 +/- 11 versus 75.5 +/- 10 versus 70 +/- 9 beats/min [bpm], respectively, P < 0.05). The daytime heart rate was significantly higher in sustained hypertensives than in white-coat hypertensives and normotensives (79.4 +/- 10 versus 74.6 +/- 8.5 versus 74.5 +/- 8.5 bpm, respectively, P < 0.05), as were the night-time heart rate (67 +/- 8.5 versus 63 +/- 8 versus 63 +/- 8 bpm, respectively, P < 0.05) and 24 h heart rate (76.3 +/- 9 versus 72 +/- 7.8 versus 72 +/- 8 bpm, respectively, P < 0.05). When men and women were analyzed separately, the same trend was observed.
The clinic heart rate is similar in sustained and white-coat hypertensives, but the ambulatory heart rate is lower in white-coat hypertensives. As ambulatory heart rate is more representative of 24 h heart rate load and may be a better indicator of the detrimental effect of heart rate, our findings suggest that white-coat hypertensives are at lower cardiovascular risk than sustained hypertensives.
Blood Pressure Monitoring 11/2001; 6(5):239-44. · 1.52 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We sought to evaluate the relationships among circulating levels of an endogenous ouabain-like factor (EO) and systemic hemodynamics and left ventricular (LV) geometry in patients with recently diagnosed essential hypertension. We selected 92 never-treated patients with essential hypertension. Blood samples were drawn for estimation of plasma EO (radioimmunoassay) and subjects underwent echocardiographic examination to evaluate LV end-systolic and end-diastolic wall thickness and internal dimensions. LV volumes, stroke volume, cardiac output, total peripheral resistance, LV mass, and relative wall thickness were calculated, and all except the last parameter were indexed by body surface area. LV mass also was indexed by height. On the basis of the values of LV mass index (body surface area or height) and relative wall thickness, subjects were divided into groups with either normal geometry, concentric remodeling, concentric hypertrophy, or eccentric nondilated hypertrophy. In the study population as a whole, circulating EO levels were significantly and directly correlated with mean blood pressure (r = 0.21, P = .048), relative wall thickness (r = 0.34, P = .001), and total peripheral resistance index (r = 0.37, P = .0003). Plasma EO also was significantly and inversely correlated with LV end-diastolic volume index (r = -0.32, P = .002), stroke index (r = -0.34, P = .0009), and cardiac index (r = -0.35, P = .0007). In multiple regression analysis, plasma EO was an independent correlate of total peripheral resistance index, cardiac index, and relative wall thickness. Regardless of the indexation method used for LV mass, plasma EO was higher in patients with concentric remodeling than in those with either normal geometry or concentric hypertrophy. Plasma EO tended to be higher (indexation by body surface area) or was significantly higher (indexation by height) in subjects with concentric remodeling than in those with eccentric nondilated hypertrophy. Patients with concentric remodeling showed the highest total peripheral resistance index and the lowest cardiac index. Our data suggest that EO plays a role in regulating systemic hemodynamics and LV geometry in patients with essential hypertension.
American Journal of Hypertension 02/2001; 14(1):44-50. · 3.18 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: It is unknown whether "white coat" hypertension, also known as isolated clinic hypertension, shares similarities in pathophysiologic background with sustained hypertension. Therefore we evaluated 24-hour autonomic nervous function in sustained and white coat hypertension.
We selected 12 patients with sustained hypertension (clinic blood pressure >/=140/90 mm Hg and daytime blood pressure >135/85 mm Hg) and 12 patients with white coat hypertension (clinic blood pressure >/=140/90 mm Hg and daytime blood pressure <135/85 mm Hg) from patients undergoing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and 12 normotensives for study inclusion. Groups were matched for age, sex, and body mass index and had similar dietary pattern and occupational status (civil servants with sedentary jobs). Subjects underwent noninvasive 24-hour monitoring of blood pressure, R-R interval of the electrocardiogram, body position, activity rate, and ambient temperature. Power spectral analysis of R-R intervals was performed with an autoregressive model to obtain the low-frequency component, the high-frequency component, and their ratio. Subjects also collected 24-hour urine samples for examination of norepinephrine and epinephrine excretion by high-performance liquid chromatography.
Work and sleep time, body position, ambient temperature, and activity were not different among the groups. Daytime, nighttime, and 24-hour low-frequency/high-frequency ratios were significantly higher in patients with sustained hypertension than in patients with white coat hypertension (3.4 +/- 0.45 vs 2.65 +/- 0.45, 2.35 +/- 0.60 vs 1. 82 +/- 0.45, and 3.04 +/- 0.45 vs 2.4 +/- 0.35, respectively, P <. 05). Urinary norepinephrine excretion (53 +/- 12 microg vs 29.5 +/- 6 microg; P <.05) and vanillylmandelic acid excretion (4.45 +/- 0.6 mg vs 3.1 +/- 0.55 mg; P <.05) during the 24 hours were significantly higher in patients with sustained hypertension than in those with white coat hypertension. There was no difference between those with white coat hypertension and normotensives concerning the aforementioned parameters.
Our findings indicate whole-day sympathetic overactivity in sustained hypertension but not in white coat hypertension, suggesting that these conditions show some differences in pathophysiologic background.
American heart journal 10/2000; 140(4):672-7. · 4.65 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Low-density lipoprotein oxidation and antioxidant vitamins E and C were investigated in dipper (nocturnal blood pressure fall > 10%) and nondipper (nocturnal blood pressure fall < 10%) hypertensives. We studied 40 dippers and 28 nondippers balanced for gender, age, and body mass index. Blood samples were drawn for lipid profile determination, assessment of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, and fluorescent products of lipid peroxidation in native low-density lipoprotein, evaluation of susceptibility to low-density lipoprotein oxidation in vitro (lag phase and propagation rate), and determination of low-density lipoprotein vitamin E and plasma vitamins E and C contents. Compared with dippers, nondippers had significantly higher thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances and fluorescent products of lipid peroxidation (0.63 +/- 0.1 v 0.77 +/- 0.08 nmol malondialdehyde/mg low-density lipoprotein protein, and 14.5 +/- 6 v 17.9 +/- 4 units of relative fluorescence/mg low-density lipoprotein protein, respectively, both P < .05), shorter lag phase (56 +/- 13 v 49 +/- 9 min, P < .05), and lower plasma vitamin C content (42 +/- 9 v 35 +/- 10 micromol/L, P < .05). When gender was taken into account, differences were not significant between dipper and nondipper men, whereas, compared with dipper women, nondipper women showed significantly higher thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances and fluorescent products of lipid peroxidation (0.56 +/- 0.1 v 0.77 +/- 0.07 nmol malondialdehyde/mg low-density lipoprotein protein, and 12.5 +/- 4 v 17.5 +/- 4.6 units of relative fluorescence/mg low-density lipoprotein protein, respectively, both P < .05), shorter lag phase (62.5 +/- 11 v 49 +/- 9.5 min, P < .05), and lower plasma vitamin C content (44.9 +/- 10 v 34.7 +/- 10.8 micromol/L, P < .05). Given the role of low-density lipoprotein oxidation in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and that of vitamin C in protecting against it, our data suggest that nondippers, especially among women, show higher atherogenic risk than dippers.
American Journal of Hypertension 04/1999; 12(4 Pt 1):356-63. · 3.18 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We sought to evaluate whether different circadian blood pressure (BP) changes could influence the occurrence of ischemic episodes in untreated and treated hypertensive patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
In hypertensive patients with CAD the occurrence of myocardial ischemia could be influenced by either high or low BP values. Ambulatory monitoring has shown that circadian BP profile is not uniform in hypertensive patients.
Twenty-one patients with a nighttime BP fall < 10% ("nondippers"), 35 with a nighttime BP fall between > 10% and < 20% ("dippers") and 14 with a nighttime BP fall > 20% ("overdippers") with CAD underwent simultaneous ambulatory BP and electrocardiographic monitoring before and during drug therapy with nitrates and atenolol or verapamil in a prospective, randomized, open, blinded end point design.
Daytime BP was not significantly different among the groups both before and during therapy. Nighttime BP was different by definition. Treatment significantly reduced BP values in each group (p < 0.05). Daytime ischemic episodes did not differ among the groups either before or during therapy. Drug therapy significantly reduced daytime ischemia (p < 0.05). In untreated patients, nighttime ischemia was more frequent in nondippers than in dippers and overdippers (p < 0.05). Drug therapy significantly reduced nocturnal ischemia in nondippers (p < 0.05), had no significant effect in dippers and significantly increased nighttime ischemia in overdippers (p < 0.05). During treatment, nighttime ischemia was more frequent in overdippers than in dippers and nondippers (p < 0.05). The same results were achieved when ischemic episodes were defined with more restrictive criteria (ST segment depression > or = 2 mm).
Circadian BP changes can influence the occurrence of myocardial ischemia in untreated and treated hypertensive patients with CAD. Nocturnal ischemia was found to be more frequent in nondippers among untreated patients and in overdippers among treated patients, potentially suggesting different therapeutic approaches based on circadian BP profile.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 07/1998; 31(7):1627-34. · 14.16 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Low-density lipoprotein oxidation and antioxidant vitamins E and C were investigated in white-coat hypertension in comparison with sustained hypertension and normotension. We selected 21 sustained hypertensive subjects, 21 white-coat hypertensive subjects, and 21 normotensive subjects matched for gender, age, and body mass index. White-coat hypertension was defined as clinical hypertension and daytime ambulatory blood pressure <139/90 (subjects were also reclassified using 134/90 and 135/85 mm Hg as cutoff points for daytime blood pressure). Blood samples were drawn for lipid profile determination, assessment of fluorescent products of lipid peroxidation in native LDL, evaluation of susceptibility to LDL oxidation in vitro (lag phase and propagation rate), and determination of LDL vitamin E and plasma vitamins E and C contents. Compared with sustained hypertensive subjects, white-coat hypertensives had significantly lower fluorescent products of lipid peroxidation (15.4+/-3.4 versus 10.2+/-3 units of relative fluorescence/mg LDL protein, P<.05), longer lag phase (54+/-10 versus 88+/-10 minutes, P<.05), lower propagation rate (8.2+/-2.5 versus 5.95+/-2.1 nmol diene/min per mg LDL cholesterol, P<.05), higher LDL vitamin E content (8.3+/-1.1 versus 10.1+/-1.8 nmol/mg LDL cholesterol, P<.05), and plasma vitamin C content (40+/-13 versus 57+9 micromol/L, P<. 05). No significant difference was observed between white-coat hypertensive and normotensive subjects. The results did not change after reclassification of subjects. Our data show that white-coat hypertensive subjects do not show an enhanced propensity to LDL oxidation or reduction in antioxidant vitamins. Given the role of LDL oxidation in the development of atherosclerosis and that of vitamin E and C in protecting against it, these findings suggest that white-coat hypertension per se carries a low atherogenic risk.
Hypertension 02/1998; 31(2):621-6. · 6.21 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether sustained hypertensives with high clinic blood pressure, despite multiple drug treatment, show a true resistant hypertension or a "white-coat effect," and whether the pretreatment white-coat effect is maintained despite pharmacological therapy. The occurrence of resistant hypertension was determined in 250 consecutive essential hypertensives who had had an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring before treatment assignment. Twenty-seven of 250 hypertensives with persistently high clinic blood pressure despite 3 months of adequate pharmacological therapy underwent further ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Using our internal standards, seven patients had a true resistant hypertension whereas 20 subjects showed a large white-coat effect (white-coat resistant hypertension), ie, high clinic blood pressure (> 140/90) but "normal" ambulatory daytime (< 139/90 mm Hg) and 24 h (135/85 mm Hg) blood pressure. Using other cutoff points for ambulatory blood pressure, 134/90 and 135/85 mm Hg for daytime blood pressure, 10 and 13 patients, respectively, were reclassified as true resistant hypertensives and 17 and 14, respectively, were white-coat resistant hypertensives. Interestingly, in white-coat resistant hypertensives the large differences between clinic and ambulatory daytime blood pressure (white-coat effect), recorded before treatment assignment, were not affected by drugs and remained constant over time. Left ventricular mass index in white-coat resistant hypertensives was significantly lower than in truly resistant hypertensives, suggesting that prognosis could differ between these groups. In this study, using either our internal standards or some other cutoffs reported in the literature, the white-coat phenomenon was an important cause of resistant hypertension. The use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in these patients may avoid misdiagnosis of resistant hypertension, unnecessary overtreatment, and expensive procedures to look for possible secondary hypertension.
American Journal of Hypertension 12/1997; 10(11):1302-7. · 3.18 Impact Factor
-
-
-
