K M Messenger

North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

Are you K M Messenger?

Claim your profile

Publications (3)3.54 Total impact

  • Article: Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine and its active metabolite monoethylglycinexylidide after a single intravenous administration in chickens (Gallus domesticus) anesthetized with isoflurane.
    Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 12/2011; · 1.18 Impact Factor
  • Article: Distribution of enrofloxacin and its active metabolite, using an in vivo ultrafiltration sampling technique after the injection of enrofloxacin to pigs.
    K M Messenger, M G Papich, A T Blikslager
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Messenger, K. M., Papich, M. G., Blikslager, A. T. Distribution of enrofloxacin and its active metabolite, using an in vivo ultrafiltration sampling technique after the injection of enrofloxacin to pigs. J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 35, 452-459. The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) of enrofloxacin in pigs and compare to the tissue interstitial fluid (ISF). Six healthy, young pigs were administered 7.5 mg/kg enrofloxacin subcutaneously (SC). Blood and ISF samples were collected from preplaced intravenous catheters and ultrafiltration sampling probes placed in three different tissue sites (intramuscular, subcutaneous, and intrapleural). Enrofloxacin concentrations were measured using high-pressure liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection, PK parameters were analyzed using a one-compartment model, and protein binding was determined using a microcentrifugation system. Concentrations of the active metabolite ciprofloxacin were negligible. The mean ± SD enrofloxacin plasma half-life, volume of distribution, clearance, and peak concentration were 26.6 ± 6.2 h (harmonic mean), 6.4 ± 1.2 L/kg, 0.18 ± 0.08 L/kg/h, and 1.1 ± 0.3 μg/mL, respectively. The half-life of enrofloxacin from the tissues was 23.6 h, and the maximum concentration was 1.26 μg/mL. Tissue penetration, as measured by a ratio of area-under-the-curve (AUC), was 139% (±69%). Plasma protein binding was 31.1% and 37.13% for high and low concentrations, respectively. This study demonstrated that the concentration of biologically active enrofloxacin in tissues exceeds the concentration predicted by the unbound fraction of enrofloxacin in pig plasma. At a dose of 7.5 mg/kg SC, the high tissue concentrations and long half-life produce an AUC/MIC ratio sufficient for the pathogens that cause respiratory infections in pigs.
    Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 09/2011; 35(5):452-9. · 1.18 Impact Factor
  • Article: Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and intramuscular buprenorphine in the horse.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine following intravenous (i.v.) and intramuscular (i.m.) administration in horses. Six horses received i.v. or i.m. buprenorphine (0.005 mg/kg) in a randomized, crossover design. Plasma samples were collected at predetermined times and horses were monitored for adverse reactions. Buprenorphine concentrations were measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Following i.v. administration, clearance was 7.97±5.16 mL/kg/min, and half-life (T(1/2)) was 3.58 h (harmonic mean). Volume of distribution was 3.01±1.69 L/kg. Following i.m. administration, maximum concentration (C(max)) was 1.74±0.09 ng/mL, which was significantly lower than the highest measured concentration (4.34±1.22 ng/mL) after i.v. administration (P<0.001). Time to C(max) was 0.9±0.69 h and T(1/2) was 4.24 h. Bioavailability was variable (51-88%). Several horses showed signs of excitement. Gut sounds were decreased 10±2.19 and 8.67±1.63 h in the i.v. and i.m. group, respectively. Buprenorphine has a moderate T(1/2) in the horse and was detected at concentrations expected to be therapeutic in other species after i.v. and i.m. administration of 0.005 mg/kg. Signs of excitement and gastrointestinal stasis may be noted.
    Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 03/2011; 35(1):52-8. · 1.18 Impact Factor