Michael Gnant

Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Vienna, Austria

Are you Michael Gnant?

Claim your profile

Publications (217)1341.22 Total impact

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recently, HER3-expression was postulated as independent risk factor for metastatic spread. Therefore, we investigated the role of HER3 expression as prognostic marker in metastatic breast cancer patients.
    Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 07/2014; · 2.09 Impact Factor
  • The Lancet Oncology 05/2014; · 25.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report the results of a phase II trial of adding the anti-ascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) bevacizumab to gemcitabine neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with borderline and unresectable non-metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients were assigned to one of the two treatment arms. Both groups received 1,000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle for a total of four cycles. Group 1 received 5 mg/kg bevacizumab for six weeks (three doses), every second week, starting at week 6 of gemcitabine therapy. Group 2 received 5 mg/kg bevacizumab for 12 weeks (six doses), every second week, starting at week 1 of gemcitabine therapy. The objective of the present study was to assess the rate of complete radical resection and overall survival. A total of 30 patients were enrolled: 19 patients had unresectable and 11 patients had borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer. Eleven patients (37%) underwent resection. The median overall survival of patients who underwent tumor resection was 13 months (95% confidence interval=11-15 months). In general, adding bevacizumab to neoadjuvant gemcitabine does not improve outcomes for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. However, in individual cases, surgery is consequently possible and prolonged survival may be observed.
    Anticancer research 05/2014; 34(5):2377-84. · 1.71 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients without pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy have an unfavourable prognosis. TNBC harbouring BRCA-1 germline mutations may be less responsive to taxanes, while sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents is retained. A similar effect was seen in tumours with epigenetic BRCA-1 silencing. Patients without pCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of epirubicin plus docetaxel routinely received post-operative CMF at our centre. Here, we investigated the effect of adjuvant CMF in patients with or without BRCA-1 methylation or TP53 mutation. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. For determining BRCA-1 methylation status, quantitative methylation-specific PCR was performed. For the investigation of TP53 mutation status, DNA was PCR amplified and sequenced by Sanger sequencing. Twenty-four patients were included; BRCA-1 methylation was present in 41.7 %, while TP53 mutations were observed in 66.7 %. At a median follow-up of 27.5 months, 20 % of patients with BRCA-1 methylation had a disease-free survival (DFS) event, as compared to 64.3 % in the non-methylated group (p = 0.0472). Median DFS in the non-methylated group was 16 months and was not reached in the methylated group (n.s.). No association TP53 mutation status with clinical outcome was observed. Adjuvant CMF is of limited activity in TNBC refractory to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In this population, BRCA-1 methylation was associated with a significant decrease in DFS events suggesting a better prognosis and potentially retained activity of DNA-damaging agents.
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 02/2014; · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There are no published data on standardized scoring systems for morbidity after breast cancer surgery. Aim of the study was to establish the Clavien Dindo Classification (CDC) as assessment tool and to identify risk factors for morbidity after breast surgery investigating new techniques including oncoplastic surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Between 2008 and 2010, data were retrospectively evaluated from 485 women with breast cancer who underwent surgery at a university hospital. The CDC was used to assess the severity of postoperative complications. Multivariable analyses were adjusted by body-mass index, smoking, diabetes mellitus and tumour size. Overall complications (CDC 1-4) were reported in 28.7%. Second surgery related to major complications (CDC 3-4) was mandatory in 4.7%. Axillary dissection was an independent predictor for CDC 1-4 in all patients (P = 0.008, OR of 1.81, 95%CI 1.17-2.82). We found no independent predictor for CDC 3-4. Oncoplastic surgery increased the rate of wound infections (P = 0.010, OR: 2.94, 95%CI 1.30-6.67) and necroses (P < 0.001, OR: 8.38, 95%CI 3.28-21.4). Axillary dissection elevated wound infection (P = 0.040, OR: 2.07, 95%CI 1.03-4.14) and seroma rates (P < 0.001, OR: 2.46, 95%CI 1.51-4.01). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy had no impact on morbidity. The CDC is a valid assessment tool for future clinical trials and may be useful for hospital quality control. While axillary dissection and oncoplastic surgery raised morbidity, no single factor predicted for morbidity related second surgery.
    International Journal of Surgery (London, England) 01/2014; · 1.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The CARIATIDE study was designed to assess the impact of educational materials (EMs) on compliance and persistence rates with aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer. Patients were randomized to standard AI treatment (Group A; N = 1379) or standard AI treatment plus EMs containing information on a range of breast-cancer-related topics (Group B; N = 1379). Standardized questionnaires assessed investigator-perceived levels of care and evaluated patient compliance and behavior. At 1 year, there was no significant difference in compliance between Group A and Group B (81% vs. 82%, p = 0.4524). However, higher compliance in patients receiving EMs was observed in Sweden/Finland (p = 0.0246). Compliance with initial AI and persistence rate were not significantly altered by EM. Other factors associated with improved compliance, irrespective of EMs, e.g. administration of chemotherapy were identified.
    Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 01/2014; · 2.09 Impact Factor
  • 01/2014;
  • The Breast. 01/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction There are no published data on standardized scoring systems for morbidity after breast cancer surgery. Aim of the study was to establish the Clavien Dindo Classification (CDC) as assessment tool and to identify risk factors for morbidity after breast surgery investigating new techniques including oncoplastic surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and methods Between 2008 and 2010, data were retrospectively evaluated from 485 women with breast cancer who underwent surgery at a university hospital. The CDC was used to assess the severity of postoperative complications. Multivariable analyses were adjusted by body-mass index, smoking, diabetes mellitus and tumour size. Results Overall complications (CDC 1–4) were reported in 28.7%. Second surgery related to major complications (CDC 3–4) was mandatory in 4.7%. Axillary dissection was an independent predictor for CDC 1–4 in all patients (P = 0.008, OR of 1.81, 95%CI 1.17–2.82). We found no independent predictor for CDC 3–4. Oncoplastic surgery increased the rate of wound infections (P = 0.010, OR: 2.94, 95%CI 1.30–6.67) and necroses (P < 0.001, OR: 8.38, 95%CI 3.28–21.4). Axillary dissection elevated wound infection (P = 0.040, OR: 2.07, 95%CI 1.03–4.14) and seroma rates (P < 0.001, OR: 2.46, 95%CI 1.51–4.01). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy had no impact on morbidity. Conclusion The CDC is a valid assessment tool for future clinical trials and may be useful for hospital quality control. While axillary dissection and oncoplastic surgery raised morbidity, no single factor predicted for morbidity related second surgery.
    International Journal of Surgery. 01/2014;
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Surgical excision of colorectal cancer at early clinical stages is highly effective, but 20-30% of patients relapse. Therefore, it is of clinical relevance to identify patients at high risk for recurrence, who would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. The objective of this study was to identify prognostic and/or predictive methylation markers in stage II colorectal cancer patients. Therefore, we selected six gene promoters (FZD9, PCDH10 (protocadherin 10), SFRP2, SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine), UCHL1 (ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 1), and WIF1) for methylation analysis in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary tumor samples of colorectal cancer patients (n=143) who were enrolled in a prospective randomized phase III trial of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal cancer Study Group. Patients were randomized to adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin or surveillance only. Survival analyses revealed that combined evaluation of three promoters (PCDH10, SPARC, and UCHL1) showed differential effects with regard to disease-free survival and overall survival in the two treatment groups (significance level 0.007). In the chemotherapy arm, a statistically insignificant trend for patients without methylation toward longer survival was observed (P=0.069 for disease-free survival and P=0.139 for overall survival). Contrary, patients in the surveillance arm without methylation in their gene promoters had shorter disease-free survival and overall survival (P=0.031 for disease-free survival and P=0.003 for overall survival), indicating a prognostic effect of methylation in this group (test for interaction, P=0.006 for disease-free survival and P=0.018 for overall survival). These results indicate that promoter methylation status of PCDH10, SPARC, and UCHL1 may be used both as prognostic and predictive molecular marker for colorectal cancer patients and, therefore, may facilitate treatment decisions for stage II colorectal cancer.Modern Pathology advance online publication, 6 December 2013; doi:10.1038/modpathol.2013.204.
    Modern Pathology 12/2013; · 5.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR(+)) breast cancer in whom disease progresses or there is recurrence while taking a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) are usually treated with exemestane (EXE), but no single standard of care exists in this setting. The BOLERO-2 trial demonstrated that adding everolimus (EVE) to EXE improved progression-free survival (PFS) while maintaining quality of life when compared with EXE alone. Because many women with HR(+) advanced breast cancer are elderly, the tolerability profile of EVE plus EXE in this population is of interest. BOLERO-2, a phase III randomized trial, compared EVE (10 mg/d) and placebo (PBO), both plus EXE (25 mg/d), in 724 postmenopausal women with HR(+) advanced breast cancer recurring/progressing after treatment with NSAIs. Safety and efficacy data in elderly patients are reported at 18-month median follow-up. Baseline disease characteristics and treatment histories among the elderly subsets (≥ 65 years, n = 275; ≥ 70 years, n = 164) were generally comparable with younger patients. The addition of EVE to EXE improved PFS regardless of age (hazard ratio, 0.59 [≥ 65 years] and 0.45 [≥ 70 years]). Adverse events (AEs) of special interest (all grades) that occurred more frequently with EVE than with PBO included stomatitis, infections, rash, pneumonitis, and hyperglycemia. Elderly EVE-treated patients had similar incidences of these AEs as did younger patients but had more on-treatment deaths. Adding EVE to EXE offers substantially improved PFS over EXE and was generally well tolerated in elderly patients with HR(+) advanced breast cancer. Careful monitoring and appropriate dose reductions or interruptions for AE management are recommended during treatment with EVE in this patient population.
    Clinical Breast Cancer 12/2013; 13(6):421-432.e8. · 2.42 Impact Factor
  • Breast Care 12/2013; 8(6):457-60. · 0.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Effective treatments for hormone-receptor-positive (HR(+)) breast cancer (BC) following relapse/progression on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) therapy are needed. Initial Breast Cancer Trials of OraL EveROlimus-2 (BOLERO-2) trial data demonstrated that everolimus and exemestane significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo plus exemestane alone in this patient population. BOLERO-2 is a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, international trial comparing everolimus (10 mg/day) plus exemestane (25 mg/day) versus placebo plus exemestane in postmenopausal women with HR(+) advanced BC with recurrence/progression during or after NSAIs. The primary endpoint was PFS by local investigator review, and was confirmed by independent central radiology review. Overall survival, response rate, and clinical benefit rate were secondary endpoints. Final study results with median 18-month follow-up show that median PFS remained significantly longer with everolimus plus exemestane versus placebo plus exemestane [investigator review: 7.8 versus 3.2 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.45 (95% confidence interval 0.38-0.54); log-rank P < 0.0001; central review: 11.0 versus 4.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.31-0.48); log-rank P < 0.0001] in the overall population and in all prospectively defined subgroups, including patients with visceral metastases, patients with recurrence during or within 12 months of completion of adjuvant therapy, and irrespective of age. The incidence and severity of adverse events were consistent with those reported at the interim analysis and in other everolimus trials. The addition of everolimus to exemestane markedly prolonged PFS in patients with HR(+) advanced BC with disease recurrence/progression following prior NSAIs. These results further support the use of everolimus plus exemestane in this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT00863655.
    Advances in Therapy 10/2013; · 2.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite significant improvements in perioperative mortality as well as response rates to multimodality treatment, results after surgical resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with respect to long-term outcomes remain disappointing. Patient recruitment for prospective international trials on adjuvant and neoadjuvant regimens is challenging for various reasons. We set out to assess the preconditions and potential to perform perioperative trials for pancreatic cancer within a well-established Austrian nationwide network of surgical and medical oncologists (Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group). From 2005 to 2010 five high-volume centers and one medium-volume center completed standardized data entry forms with 33 parameters (history and patient related data, preoperative clinical staging and work-up, surgical details and intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, reinterventions, reoperations, 30-day mortality, histology, and timing of multimodality treatment). Outside of the study group, in Austria pancreatic resections are performed in three "high-volume" centers (>10 pancreatic resections per year), three "medium-volume" centers (5-10 pancreatic resections per year), and the rest in various low-volume centers (<5 pancreatic resections per year) in Austria. Nationwide data for prevalence of and surgical resections for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were contributed by the National Cancer Registry of Statistics of Austria and the Austrian Health Institute. In total, 492 consecutive patients underwent pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. All postoperative complications leading to hospital readmission were treated at the primary surgical department and documented in the database. Overall morbidity and pancreatic fistula rate were 45.5 % and 10.1 %, respectively. Within the entire cohort there were 9.8 % radiological reinterventions and 10.4 % reoperations. Length of stay was 16 days in median (0-209); 12 of 492 patients died within 30 days after operation, resulting in a 30-day mortality rate of 2.4 %. Seven of the total 19 deaths (36.8 %) occurred after 30 days, during hospitalization at the surgical department, resulting in a hospital mortality rate of 3.9 % (19/492). With a standardized histopathological protocol, there were 70 % (21/30) R0 resections, 30 % (9/30) R1 resections, and no R2 resections in Vienna and 62.7 % (32/51) R0 resections, 35.3 % (18/51) R1 resections, and 2 % (1/51) R2 resections in Salzburg. Resection margin status with nonstandardized protocols was classified as R0 in 82 % (339/411), R1 in 16 % (16/411), and R2 in 1.2 % (5/411). Perioperative chemotherapy was administered in 81.1 % of patients (8.3 % neoadjuvant; 68.5 % adjuvant; 4.3 % palliative); chemoradiotherapy (1.6 % neoadjuvant; 3 % adjuvant; 0.2 % palliative), in 4.9 % of patients. The six centers that contributed to this registry initiative provided surgical treatment to 40 % of all Austrian patients, resulting in a median annual recruitment of 85 (51-104) patients for the entire ABCSG-group and a median of 11.8 (0-38) surgeries for each individual department. Surgical quality data of the ABCSG core pancreatic group are in line with international standards. With continuing centralization the essential potential to perform prospective clinical trials for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is given in Austria. Several protocol proposals aiming at surgical and multimodality research questions are currently being discussed.
    World Journal of Surgery 10/2013; · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is of considerable concern in patients undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). Prolonged hospital stay, increased cost, and decreased quality of life add on to interventions needed to treat DGE. This study was conducted to determine if performing duodenojejunostomy via the antecolic rather than the retrocolic route improved incidence of DGE. Patients undergoing PPPD between April 2007 and November 2009 were randomized for either antecolic or retrocolic reconstruction of the duodenojejunostomy. DGE was then assessed by clinical criteria on postoperative day (POD) 10. A paracetamol absorption test was also administered with a liquid meal, and serial plasma levels of intestinal peptides were measured. Overall, 64 patients were amenable for analysis: 36 in the antecolic group and 28 in the retrocolic group. The incidences of DGE on POD 10 were 17.6 and 23.1 % (antecolic vs. retrocolic, respectively) (p = 0.628). The two groups did not differ in regard to their median (interquartile range) postoperative hospital length of stay [13.0 (10.0-17.5) vs. 12.5 (11.0-17.0) days; p = 0.446], time to regular diet [5 (5-7) vs. 5 (4-6) days; p = 0.353], or morbidity (52.9 vs. 50.0 %; p = 0.777). The median length of nasogastric tube decompression was similar in the two groups [4 (3-7) vs. 3 (3-5) days; p = 0.600]. Levels of paracetamol and glucagon-like peptide-1 were markedly decreased in patients with DGE. Antecolic reconstruction after PPPD does not improve the occurrence/the incidence of DGE and is similar to retrocolic reconstruction with regard to secondary outcome parameters.
    World Journal of Surgery 10/2013; · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aims to investigate the relationship between gastric emptying, postprandial GLP-1 and insulin sensitivity after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Abnormal glucose regulation is highly prevalent in patients with pancreatic neoplasm and resolves in some after PD, the cause of which is unclear. The procedure is carried out with pylorus preservation (PPPD) or with distal gastrectomy (Whipple procedure). Accelerated gastric emptying and ensuing enhanced release of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) conceivably play a role in glucose metabolism after PD. It was the purpose of this study to shed light on the relationship between gastric emptying, GLP-1 and glycemic control after PPPD and the Whipple procedure. A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test was carried out in 13 patients having undergone PPPD and in 13 after the Whipple procedure, median age 61 (range, 32-70) years, following an interval of 23 (range, 5-199) months. Gastric emptying was measured by the paracetamol absorption method. Plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin, GLP-1 and paracetamol were measured at baseline, 10, 20, 30 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min. Homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and oral glucose insulin sensitivity were calculated from glucose and insulin concentrations. Patients with Whipple procedure as compared to PPPD had accelerated gastric emptying (p = 0.01) which correlated with early (0-30 min) integrated GLP-1 (AUC30; r (2) = 0.61; p = 0.02) and insulin sensitivity (r (2) = 0.41; p = 0.026) and inversely with HOMA-IR (r (2) = 0.17; p = 0.033). Two of 13 Whipple patients (15 %) as compared to seven of 13 after PPPD (54 %) had postload glucose concentrations (i.e. 120 min postmeal) ≥200 mg/dl (p < 0.05). None of 13 (0 %) after Whipple procedure but four of 13 patients (31 %) after PPPD had fasting glucose concentrations ≥126 mg/dl (p < 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: Gastric emptying was accelerated after Whipple procedure as compared to patients who have undergone PPPD, resulting in higher postprandial GLP-1 concentrations and insulin sensitivity and improved glycemic control.
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 09/2013; · 2.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: Everolimus (EVE)+exemestane (EXE; n=485) more than doubled median progression-free survival versus placebo (PBO)+EXE (n=239), with a manageable safety profile and no deterioration in health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) in patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR(+)) advanced breast cancer (ABC) who recurred or progressed on/after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) therapy. To further evaluate EVE+EXE impact on disease burden, we conducted additional post-hoc analyses of patient-reported HRQOL. Research design and methods: HRQOL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires at baseline and every 6 weeks thereafter until treatment discontinuation because of disease progression, toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Endpoints included the QLQ-C30 Global Health Status (QL2) scale, the QLQ-BR23 breast symptom (BRBS), and arm symptom (BRAS) scales. Between-group differences in change from baseline were assessed using linear mixed models with selected covariates. Sensitivity analysis using pattern-mixture models determined the effect of study discontinuation on/before week 24. Treatment arms were compared using differences of least squares mean (LSM) changes from baseline and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) at each timepoint and overall. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00863655. Main outcome measures: Progression-free survival, survival, response rate, safety, and HRQOL. Results: Linear mixed models (primary model) demonstrated no statistically significant overall difference between EVE+EXE and PBO+EXE for QL2 (LSM difference=-1.91; 95% CI=-4.61, 0.78), BRBS (LSM difference=-0.18; 95% CI=-1.98, 1.62), or BRAS (LSM difference=-0.42; 95% CI=-2.94, 2.10). Based on pattern-mixture models, patients who dropped out early had worse QL2 decline on both treatments. In the expanded pattern-mixture model, EVE+EXE-treated patients who did not drop out early had stable BRBS and BRAS relative to PBO+EXE. Key limitations: HRQOL data were not collected after disease progression. Conclusions: These analyses confirm that EVE+EXE provides clinical benefit without adversely impacting HRQOL in patients with HR(+) ABC who recurred/progressed on prior NSAIs versus endocrine therapy alone.
    Current Medical Research and Opinion 08/2013; · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Summary In patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer, response to endocrine therapy is frequently limited by endocrine resistance. One important mechanism of resistance is related to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a molecule involved in the activation of alternative signaling pathways. Preclinically, resensitization of endocrine resistance can be achieved by the addition of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus to endocrine therapy. Recent results of clinical trials confirmed the clinical activity of combining everolimus and endocrine therapy in neoadjuvant and advanced breast cancer. The BOLERO-2 trial demonstrated significant progression-free survival benefits for the addition of everolimus to exemestane. These data were the basis for the recent approval of everolimus in combination with exemestane for the treatment of advanced hormone receptor- positive breast cancer. In clinical practice, the following 3 patient groups are particularly suitable for this treatment: those with progression on aromatase inhibitor therapy, those who respond well to chemotherapy and might benefit from subsequent endocrine therapy, and those with non-aggressive tumor biology. Everolimus treatment requires careful clinical monitoring due to the potentially serious side effects, e.g. stomatitis and pneumonitis. It is also important to educate patients and physicians in order to increase their awareness of side effects. At present, everolimus is investigated in clinical trials.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Schlüsselwörter Mammakarzinom, fortgeschrittenes · Endokrine Therapie · Endokrine Resistenz · mTOR-Hemmung · Everolimus · Exemestan Zusammenfassung Aufgrund von endokriner Resistenz sprechen Patientinnen mit Hormonrezeptor-positivem Mammakarzinom häufig nur bedingt auf antihormonelle Therapien an. Ein wichtiger Re-sistenzmechanismus wird durch mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) vermittelt, ein Molekül mit zentraler Funktion in der Aktivierung alternativer Signalwege innerhalb der Tumorzellen. Unter präklinischen Bedingungen kann durch den mTOR-Inhibitor Everolimus eine Resensibilisierung er-reicht werden. Außerdem bestätigen klinische Studien die klinische Wirksamkeit der kombinierten Verabreichung von Everolimus und der endokrinen Therapie im neoadjuvanten und fortgeschrittenen Setting. Die Studie BOLERO-2 de-monstrierte signifikante und relevante Verbesserungen des progressionsfreien Überlebens durch die Zugabe von Eve-rol imus zu Exemestan. Diese Daten bilden die Basis für die kürzlich erfolgte Zulassung der Kombination aus Everoli-mus und Exemestan für die Behandlung des fortgeschritte-nen Hormonrezeptor-positiven Mammakarzinoms nach dem Versagen von Aromatasehemmern. In der klinischen Praxis eignen sich 3 Patientinnengruppen besonders für diese Therapie: Patientinnen mit Progression unter Aroma-stasehemmern, solche mit gutem Ansprechen auf Chemo-therapie und antihormonelle Folgetherapie sowie solche mit nicht aggressiver Tumorbiologie. Aufgrund der poten-ziell schweren Nebenwirkungen, z.B. Stomatitis und Pneu-monitis, setzt die Therapie mit Everolimus eine sorgfältige klinische Überwachung voraus. Aufklärung und Bewusst-seinsbildung hinsichtlich der Nebenwirkungen bei Ärzten und Patienten sind für ein optimales Therapiemanagement entscheidend. Derzeit wird Everolimus in weiteren klini-schen Studien untersucht.

Publication Stats

5k Citations
1,341.22 Total Impact Points

Institutions

  • 2002–2014
    • Medical University of Vienna
      • • Klinische Abteilung für Onkologie
      • • Universitätsklinik für Radiodiagnostik
      • • Institute for Social Medicine
      Wien, Vienna, Austria
  • 2013
    • University of Toronto
      Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 2012–2013
    • Philipps University of Marburg
      Marburg, Hesse, Germany
    • Krankenhaus der Barmherzige Schwestern
      Linz, Upper Austria, Austria
  • 2005–2011
    • Vienna General Hospital
      Wien, Vienna, Austria
    • Medical University of Graz
      Gratz, Styria, Austria
  • 2010
    • Policy Analysis Inc.
      Brookline, Massachusetts, United States
    • Region Hovedstaden
      Hillerød, Capital Region, Denmark
  • 2009
    • The University of Sheffield
      Sheffield, England, United Kingdom
  • 2008
    • Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg
      • Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research
      Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
    • Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
      • Department für Frauenheilkunde
      Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria
  • 2006
    • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
      Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
  • 1990–2006
    • University of Vienna
      • • Department of Surgery
      • • Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin I
      • • Department of Internal Medicine III
      Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • 1999–2001
    • National Cancer Institute (USA)
      • Surgery Branch
      Bethesda, MD, United States
    • Technische Universität München
      München, Bavaria, Germany
  • 1999–2000
    • National Institutes of Health
      • Branch of Surgery
      Bethesda, MD, United States