Lieba Savitt

Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Are you Lieba Savitt?

Claim your profile

Publications (6)14.49 Total impact

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Proctectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) can be performed via intramesorectal (IME) or total mesorectal excision (TME). Methods We compared patient-reported bowel and sexual function among IME vs. TME UC patients (09/2000-03/2011) using MSKCC: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function scale; FIQL: Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life; FISI: Fecal Incontinence Severity Index; FSFI: Female Sexual Function Instrument; and IIED: International Index of Erectile Dysfunction survey. Results 89 IME vs. TME patients (35±2 years, 57% male, 62% IME) had similar baseline characteristics, although IME patients had more open procedures (p≤0.03). IME patients reported better fecal continence (p=0.009) but similar fecal incontinence-related quality of life (p≥0.44). For sexual function, there were no differences for either women (FSFI; p≥0.20) or men (IIED; p≥0.22). Conclusions IME appears to be associated with better fecal continence but no difference in overall bowel or sexual function compared to TME in patients with UC.
    The American Journal of Surgery. 01/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Proctectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) can be performed via intramesorectal proctectomy with concomitant rectal eversion (IMP/RE) or total mesorectal excision (TME). No data exists comparing the outcomes of the two techniques. All UC patients undergoing J-pouch surgery at a single institution over 10.5 years were included. Postoperative complications with IMP/RE vs. TME were analyzed using univariable and multivariable statistics. One hundred nineteen of 201 (59 %) patients underwent IMP/RE. Demographic and disease characteristics were similar between groups. On univariable analysis, IMP/RE had fewer total perioperative complications than TME (p = 0.02), but no differences in postoperative length of stay or readmissions. Multivariable regression accounting for patient age, comorbidities, disease severity, preoperative medications, operative technique, and follow-up time (mean 5.5 ± 0.2 years) suggested that both anastomotic leak rate (OR 0.32; p = 0.04) and overall postoperative complications (2.10 ± 0.17 vs. 2.60 ± 0.20; p = 0.05) were lower in the IMP/RE group. IMP/RE may be associated with fewer overall postoperative complications compared to TME. However, further studies on functional and long-term outcomes are needed.
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 10/2013; · 2.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AIM: To determine the relationship between obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) and rectoceles. METHODS: From 12/07 to 11/11, all female patients with ODS were prospectively evaluated with full interview, clinical exam and anorectal physiology testing. Characteristics of patients with and without rectoceles were compared, and logistic regression was utilized to identify factors predictive of patients having a rectocele beyond the introitus. RESULTS: Of 239 patients with ODS, 90 (mean age 52.3±1.7 years) had a rectocele. Patients with rectoceles (R+) had a similar prevalence of incomplete emptying compared to patients with no rectocele (R-) (p≥0.21), but only R+ patients reported splinting with defecation (36.7% vs. 0%; p<0.0001). Anorectal manometry measurements including mean resting pressure, maximum resting pressure, and maximum squeeze pressure were similar between groups (p≥0.12). There were also no significant differences in rectal compliance (maximum tolerated volume) or rectal sensitivity (volume of first sensation) (p≥0.65). R+ patients had greater difficulty expelling a 60cc balloon (70.1% vs. 57.5%; p=0.05), but prevalence of pelvic floor dyssynergia as quantified by non-relaxation on EMG testing was similar to R- patients (p=0.49). Logistic regression suggested that only difficulty with balloon expulsion was associated with higher odds of having a rectocele (OR 3.00; p=0.002), whereas mean resting pressure, EMG non-relaxation, and symptoms of incomplete emptying were not (p≥0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Rectoceles are not associated with an increased severity of ODS-type symptoms, anorectal abnormalities, or pelvic floor dyssynergia in patients with ODS. This suggests that rectoceles may be the result, rather than the cause, of obstructed defecation syndrome. © 2013 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
    Colorectal Disease 03/2013; · 2.08 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The indications for surgery in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) with rectocele are not well defined. Methods 90 female patients with ODS and rectocele were prospectively evaluated and treated with fiber supplements and biofeedback training. Univariate and multivariate regression was used to determine factors predictive of failing medical management. Results Obstructive symptoms were the most prevalent presenting complaint (82.2%). Ultimately, 71.1% of patients responded to medical management and biofeedback. Multivariate regression analysis suggested that the presence of internal intussusception was associated with a lower chance of undergoing surgery to address ODS symptoms [OR 0.18; p=0.05], while inability to expel balloon, contrast retention on defecography, and splinting were not (p≥0.15). Conclusions Rectoceles with concomitant intussusception in patients with ODS appear to portend a favorable response to biofeedback and medical management. We argue that all patients considered for surgery for rectoceles due to ODS should first undergo appropriate bowel retraining.
    Surgery 01/2013; · 3.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bowel function following surgery for diverticulitis has not previously been systematically described. This study aimed to document the frequency, severity, and predictors of suboptimal bowel function in patients who have undergone sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. This study is a retrospective analysis. This study was conducted at a large, academic medical center. Three hundred twenty-five patients who underwent laparoscopic or open sigmoid colectomy with restoration of intestinal continuity for diverticulitis were included in the study population. Of these, 249 patients (76.6%) returned a 70-question survey incorporating the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, and the Memorial Bowel Function Instrument. Survey responders and nonresponders were compared with the use of χ and t tests. Responders with suboptimal bowel function (fecal incontinence, urgency and/or incomplete emptying) were then compared with those with good outcomes by the use of logistic regression analysis to determine the predictors of poor function. Of the responders, 24.8% reported clinically relevant fecal incontinence (Fecal Incontinence Severity Index ≥ 24), 19.6% reported fecal urgency (Memorial Bowel Function Instrument Urgency Subscale ≥ 4), and 20.8% reported incomplete emptying (Memorial Bowel Function Instrument Emptying Subscale ≥ 4). On logistic regression analysis, fecal incontinence was predicted by female sex (OR = 2.3, p = 0.008) and the presence of a preoperative abscess (OR = 1.4, p < 0.05). Fecal urgency was associated with female sex (OR = 1.3, p < 0.05) and a diverting ileostomy (OR = 2.1, p < 0.001). Incomplete emptying was associated with female sex (OR = 1.4, p < 0.05) and postoperative sepsis (OR = 1.9, p < 0.05). This study was limited by the fact that we did not use a nondiverticulitis control group and we had limited preoperative data on the history of bowel impairment symptoms. One-fifth of patients reported fecal urgency, fecal incontinence, or incomplete emptying after surgery for diverticulitis. Despite the limitations of our study, these results are concerning and should be investigated further prospectively.
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 01/2012; 55(1):10-7. · 3.34 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Failure to expel a 60-mL balloon on manometry and abnormal relaxation of anal sphincter on electromyographic testing are frequently used to diagnose pelvic floor dyssynergia. However, the relationship between these 2 test results and their relationship to defecography is poorly characterized. We aimed to describe this relationship and create a predictive model for pelvic floor dyssynergia on defecography. From March 2008 to April 2010 consecutive patients with symptoms suggestive of functional constipation were evaluated at our Pelvic Floor Disorders Center 125 and the results of their workups were collected prospectively. Sixty-three patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia on defecography were compared with 60 patients without dyssynergia in terms of manometry pressures, electromyographic text results, and balloon expulsion testing results (χ, t tests). Of 125 patients meeting Rome II symptom criteria for constipation, 123 patients underwent defecography and, of these, 63 (51.2%) had evidence of pelvic floor dyssynergia. Patients with and without dyssynergia had a slight difference in mean resting pressures (62.8 mmHg vs 49.5 mmHg, P = .02) and no discernable differences in rectal sensitivity and compliance: first sensation (56.5 vs 62.5, P = .34) and maximum tolerated volume (164.2 vs 191.2, P = .09). It appeared that abnormalities in electromyographic relaxation and balloon expulsion occurred in the same patients: 84.1% of patients with abnormal electromyographic results also did not expel the balloon. However, the presence of these abnormalities, in isolation or together, did not predict the presence of dyssynergia on defecography. Normal electromyographic results or the ability to expel a 60-mL balloon does not exclude the presence of pelvic floor dyssynergia on defecography. It is unclear which of these 3 tests should be used to guide the recommendation for (and to then measure response to) biofeedback.
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 01/2011; 54(1):60-5. · 3.34 Impact Factor

Publication Stats

18 Citations
14.49 Total Impact Points

Institutions

  • 2013
    • Johns Hopkins Medicine
      Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • 2012–2013
    • Massachusetts General Hospital
      • • Department of Surgery
      • • Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery
      Boston, Massachusetts, United States