-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The nature of interactions between observing pain in others (other-pain) and subjective pain perception (self-pain) has been debated. To test whether other-pain and self-pain primes increase or decrease responsiveness to complementary self-pain or other-pain targets, two ERP studies were conducted. In Study 1, twenty participants (10 women, 10 men) were exposed to pictures depicting other-pain or other non-painful situations, followed by self-pain or non-nociceptive heat stimulation delivered to the forearm. Significant Visual Prime×Sensory Target interactions indicated that compared to other non-painful primes, other-pain visual primes predicted faster reaction times (RTs) and smaller P2 amplitudes in response to self-pain stimuli while responses to self-heat stimuli were not affected by priming images. However, effects of other-pain primes on elevations in intensity ratings were not specific to self-pain and extended to self-heat targets. In Study 2, self-pain and self-heat stimuli were applied to the same participants followed by other-pain and other non-painful visual targets. Similar to the pattern for Study 1, Sensory Prime×Visual Target interactions indicated that compared to self-heat primes, self-pain sensory primes predicted marginally faster RTs and smaller P3 amplitudes in response to other-pain targets while responses to other non-painful targets were unaffected by sensory priming stimuli. Again, self-pain primes predicted higher intensity ratings for both target types compared to self-heat primes. Together, findings supported the shared-representation model of pain empathy more strongly than the threat value of pain hypothesis.
NeuroImage 01/2013; · 5.89 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This research examined selective biases in visual attention related to fear of pain by tracking eye movements (EM) toward pain-related stimuli among the pain-fearful. EM of 21 young adults scoring high on a fear of pain measure (H-FOP) and 20 lower-scoring (L-FOP) control participants were measured during a dot-probe task that featured sensory pain-neutral, health catastrophe-neutral and neutral-neutral word pairs. Analyses indicated that the H-FOP group was more likely to direct immediate visual attention toward sensory pain and health catastrophe words than was the L-FOP group. The H-FOP group also had comparatively shorter first fixation latencies toward sensory pain and health catastrophe words. Conversely, groups did not differ on EM indices of attentional maintenance (i.e., first fixation duration, gaze duration, and average fixation duration) or reaction times to dot probes. Finally, both groups showed a cycle of disengagement followed by re-engagement toward sensory pain words relative to other word types. In sum, this research is the first to reveal biases toward pain stimuli during very early stages of visual information processing among the highly pain-fearful and highlights the utility of EM tracking as a means to evaluate visual attention as a dynamic process in the context of FOP.
Pain 06/2012; 153(8):1742-8. · 5.78 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Previous event-related potential (ERP) and brain imaging studies have suggested observer responses to others' pain are modulated by various bottom-up and top-down factors, including emotional primes. However, the temporal dynamics underlying the impact of emotional primes on responses to others' pain remains poorly understood. In the present study, we explored effects of negative, neutral, and positive emotional priming stimuli on behavioral and cortical responses to visual depictions of others in pain. ERPs were recorded from 20 healthy adults, who were presented with painful and non-painful target pictures following observation of negative, neutral, and positive emotional priming pictures. ERP analyses revealed that relative to non-painful pictures, differential P3 amplitudes for painful pictures were larger followed by negative primes than either neutral or positive primes. There were no significant differential P3 amplitudes for painful pictures relative to non-painful pictures were found followed neutral and positive emotional primes. These results suggest that negative emotional primes strengthen observers' attention toward others' pain. These results support the threat value of pain hypothesis.
Experimental Brain Research 06/2012; 220(3-4):277-86. · 2.39 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In this experiment, sensitivity to female facial attractiveness was examined by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to attractive and unattractive female faces within a study-test paradigm. Fourteen heterosexual participants (age range 18-24 years, mean age 21.67 years) were required to judge 84 attractive and 84 unattractive face images as either "attractive" or "unattractive." They were then asked whether they had previously viewed each face in a recognition task in which 50% of the images were novel. Analyses indicated that attractive faces elicited more enhanced ERP amplitudes than did unattractive faces in judgment (N300 and P350-550 msec) and recognition (P160 and N250-400 msec and P400-700 msec) tasks on anterior locations. Moreover, longer reaction times and higher accuracy rate were observed in identifying attractive faces than unattractive faces. In sum, this research identified neural and behavioral bases related to cognitive preferences for judging and recognizing attractive female faces. Explanations for the results are that attractive female faces arouse more intense positive emotions in participants than do unattractive faces, and they also represent reproductive fitness and mating value from the evolutionary perspective.
Journal of Neuroscience Research 07/2011; 89(11):1887-93. · 2.74 Impact Factor
