Are you Weijie Chen?

Claim your profile

Publications (3)14.45 Total impact

  • Article: Effect of Nifedipine Versus Telmisartan on Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence in Hypertensive Patients.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is controversial whether angiotensin II receptor blockers provide better protection than calcium antagonists against atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in hypertensive patients. This study was designed to compare the effect of nifedipine- and telmisartan-based antihypertensive treatments for preventing AF recurrence in hypertensive patients with paroxysmal AF. A total of 149 hypertensive patients with paroxysmal AF were randomized to nifedipine- or telmisartan-based antihypertensive treatment groups. The target blood pressure (BP) was <130/80 mm Hg. Clinic BP, ECG, Holter monitoring, and echocardiography were followed up for 2 years. The primary end point was the incidence of overall and persistent AF recurrence. During follow-up, there was no statistical difference in the rate of patients lowering to target BP between both groups, whereas nifedipine group had slightly better BP control but similar heart rate control at 24 months. The incidence of AF recurrence was similar in both groups (nifedipine versus telmisartan: 58.7% versus 55.4%; P=0.742), and Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in the freedom from AF recurrence (log-rank test; P=0.48). However, the rate of developing persistent AF in telmisartan group was lower than that in nifedipine group (5.4% versus 16.0%; P=0.035). Patients in telmisartan group had lower values of left atrial diameter, left atrial volume index, and left ventricular mass index at the end of follow-up. The effects of telmisartan in preventing AF recurrences in hypertensive patients with paroxysmal AF after intensive lowering BP is similar to that of nifedipine, but telmisartan has more potent effects on preventing progression to persistent AF.
    Hypertension 02/2013; · 6.21 Impact Factor
  • Article: NT-proBNP, but not ANP and C-reactive protein, is predictive of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), atrial natriuretic peptides (ANP), N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, and the risk and recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Plasma ANP, NT-proBNP, and hs-CRP levels were measured before and 3 months after PVI in 33 patients with PAF and 30 control participants. (1) NT-proBNP levels at baseline were significantly elevated in subjects with PAF compared with control subjects (296.8 ± 272.1 vs. 80.8 ± 69.1 pg/ml), but ANP and hs-CRP levels were normal; NT-proBNP levels normalized 3 months after PVI, but ANP and hs-CRP levels did not change significantly; NT-proBNP levels at baseline in the recurrent group were markedly higher than those in the nonrecurrent AF group (572.7 ± 234.2 vs. 176.8 ± 188.7 pg/ml). (2) Cox stepwise multivariate analysis demonstrated that only elevated NT-proBNP level at baseline was an independent predictor of AF recurrence (p < 0.001) after PVI among 13 variables, such as echocardiographic parameters, plasma ANP, NT-proBNP, and hs-CRP levels. A cutoff value of NT-proBNP ≥ 423.2 pg/ml was a significant risk factor for AF recurrence (p = 0.002). Elevated NT-proBNP level at baseline, but not ANP and hs-CRP, is a sensitive biomarker for early predicting AF recurrence in patients with PAF.
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 09/2011; 33(1):93-100. · 1.17 Impact Factor
  • Article: Predictors of late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: To predict the recurrence of atrial fibrillation is important for selecting patients who will be undergoing catheter ablation, several studies respectively evaluated the risk factor of the recurrence of atrial fibrillation post-ablation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors predicting the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation. METHODS: 186 patients (55.12±12.06years, 123 male) including 161 paroxysmal AF and 25 non-paroxysmal AF who underwent catheter ablation were studied. Clinical datum before and during ablation were recorded, and systematic follow-up was conducted after ablation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to determine the factors predicting late recurrence of AF (LRAF) which means AF recurrence after 3months. RESULTS: There were 47(25.27%) patients who experienced LRAF. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was carried out to the parameters that P<0.10 in the univariate analysis, which includes overweight/obesity, metabolic syndrome (MetS), AF categories, duration of AF history, left atrial diameter (LAD), diabetes mellitus, ablation strategies, procedural failure and early recurrence of AF after ablation (ERAF). Ultimately, the results demonstrated that overweight/obesity (OR=4.71, 95% CI 1.71-12.98, P=0.003), MetS (OR=4.41, 95% CI 1.56-12.46, P=0.005), procedural failure (OR=58.34, 95% CI 6.83-498.34, P<0.001), and ERAF (OR=3.18, 95% CI 1.07-9.44, P=0.037) were independent predictors of AF recurrence after ablation. CONCLUSION: Overweight/obesity, metabolic syndrome, procedural failure and ERAF are independent predictors of late recurrence of atrial fibrillation in this group of patients.
    International journal of cardiology 07/2011; · 7.08 Impact Factor