Publications (2)4.64 Total impact
-
Article: Effect of clopidogrel pretreatment on ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention among bivalirudin-treated patients (from the EVENT registry).
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Although clopidogrel pretreatment benefits patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes, these benefits are less well established among patients undergoing elective PCI--in particular, when they are treated with the direct thrombin inhibitor, bivalirudin. We used data from the multicenter Evaluation of Drug Eluting stents and ischemic Events registry to assess the association between clopidogrel pretreatment and PCI-related complications among patients undergoing elective PCI with bivalirudin as the antithrombotic regimen. The primary end point was the composite of in-hospital death or myocardial infarction. From January 2005 and December 2007, 4,681 patients underwent elective PCI at 55 United States centers, and 1,913 (41%) received bivalirudin as the planned anticoagulant. Clopidogrel pretreatment was used in 923 patients (48%). The incidence of in-hospital death or myocardial infarction was similar among patients who did and did not receive clopidogrel pretreatment (5.5% vs 5.8%, p = 0.83). This result was unchanged in propensity-adjusted analyses (adjusted odds ratio for pretreatment 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 1.39, p = 0.66). Also, no differences were seen in the in-hospital bleeding events (1.0% vs 1.0%, p = 0.94) or 1-year ischemic complications between the 2 treatment groups (7.5% vs 8.3%, p = 0.26). In conclusion, among unselected patients undergoing elective PCI with bivalirudin as the planned anticoagulant, clopidogrel pretreatment was common but was not associated with a reduced risk of ischemic complications.The American journal of cardiology 06/2011; 107(12):1751-6. · 3.58 Impact Factor -
Article: In-hospital and 1-year outcomes among unselected percutaneous coronary intervention patients treated with either sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents: results from the EVENT (Evaluation of Drug Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events) registry.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes among unselected patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with either sirolimus-eluting (SES) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). Although the benefits of both SES and PES are well-established, studies comparing these stents directly have yielded conflicting results. We used data from the EVENT (Evaluation of Drug Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events) registry to compare in-hospital and 1-year outcomes among unselected patients undergoing nonemergent PCI with either SES or PES implantation. Between July 2004 and June 2006, 6,035 patients underwent PCI with either SES (n = 3,443) or PES (n = 2,592) at 47 U.S. centers. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were generally similar for the 2 stent types. At 1-year, there were no differences in the primary end point of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI) between the SES and PES groups (9.1% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.11) or in any individual end points including cardiac death, nonfatal MI, or stent thrombosis. In unadjusted analyses, target lesion revascularization (TLR) was slightly more common with SES than with PES (4.4% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.048), but this difference was no longer apparent after adjusting for baseline characteristics as well as site-related factors (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 0.78 to 1.50). Among unselected patients undergoing PCI, adjusted rates of both ischemic complications as well as clinically important restenosis were similar for SES and PES. The unexpected finding that TLR was influenced by site characteristics suggests that the correlation between TLR and angiographic restenosis might be weaker than previously described and warrants further study.09/2009; 2(8):767-75. · 1.07 Impact Factor
