Katia El Sibai

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Are you Katia El Sibai?

Claim your profile

Publications (4)16.39 Total impact

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sellar metastasis is uncommon and poorly characterized as published data include small series of subjects. This study's goal is to identify unique features that differentiate this entity from other sellar masses such as pituitary macroadenomas. Published cases of pathologically-confirmed sellar metastasis along with our experience in such patients over a 6-years period were reviewed (total = 129). As a control group, we reviewed similar data on 55 patients with pituitary macroadenomas managed over the same time-period. Presenting symptoms, pituitary dysfunction were analyzed using univariate, multivariate and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Sellar metastasis has equal gender distribution with a median patient-age of 56 years. The most common primary malignancy was breast cancer (29 %) in women and lung cancer (30 %) in men. Sellar metastasis was the first manifestation of cancer in over 40 % of patients. Common presenting symptoms included headaches, visual field deficits, abnormal eye motility and diabetes insipidus. These symptoms were less frequent among patients with pituitary macroadenomas. Univariate regression analyses showed that headaches, abnormal eye motility, visual field deficits and diabetes insipidus were each predictive of metastatic disease. ROC analysis combining all 4 features revealed an AUC of 0.953 with a sensitivity of 0.818 and a specificity of 0.935. Using the multivariate regression, abnormal eye motility and/or diabetes insipidus independently predicted metastatic disease. Sellar metastasis should be suspected in patients presenting with sellar masses, abnormal eye motility and/or diabetes insipidus even those without known malignancy since pituitary metastasis can often be the first manifestation of cancer.
    Pituitary 12/2013; 17(6). DOI:10.1007/s11102-013-0542-9 · 3.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and objectives: The diagnosis of central adrenal insufficiency (AI) continues to be challenging, especially when it is partial. We have recently demonstrated the value of measuring serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) in establishing the diagnosis of central AI. The current investigation examined the added value of measuring serum dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) levels during low-dose (1 μg) cosyntropin (LDC) stimulation in patients suspected to have central AI. Methods: Baseline and LDC-stimulated cortisol, DHEA, and DHEA-S were measured preoperatively in 155 consecutive patients with pituitary masses and 63 healthy subjects. Hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) function was normal (NL-HPA) in 97 of the patients and was impaired (impaired HPA) in 58 patients. Patients with NL-HPA underwent surgical removal of the sellar masses and received no glucocorticoids before, during, or after surgery. Results: Baseline and LDC-stimulated serum cortisol, DHEA, and DHEA-S in patients with NL-HPA were similar to those of normal subjects. In contrast, patients with impaired HPA had lower baseline and LDC-stimulated serum cortisol, DHEA, and DHEA-S levels. There were 18 subjects in the latter group whose LDC-stimulated serum cortisol levels were greater than 18.0 μg/dl. In those 18 subjects, baseline and LDC-stimulated DHEA and DHEA-S levels were similar to the whole group of patients with impaired HPA function. The molar ratio of cortisol to DHEA did not change with LDC stimulation in normal subjects and those with NL-HPA. In contrast, patients with impaired HPA had a higher baseline cortisol to DHEA molar ratio that increased further with LDC stimulation. Conclusions: Patients with impaired HPA function have a more severe loss in DHEA secretion than that of glucocorticoids. Measurements of serum DHEA levels during LDC simulation provide additional valuable information that improves the diagnostic accuracy of LDC in patients suspected to have central AI. We recommend the inclusion of DHEA and DHEA-S measurements in the laboratory assessment of HPA function.
    The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 07/2012; 97(10):3655-62. DOI:10.1210/jc.2012-1806 · 6.21 Impact Factor
  • Katia El Sibai · Salam Itani · Ali Rabah · Mukbil Hourani · Habib A Dakik ·
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aims of this study are to analyze the risk profile and evaluate the appropriateness of patient referral to coronary CT angiography in a new MSCT laboratory in an academic medical center in a developing country. The study population consisted of 100 consecutive patients (mean age 53 ± 13 years, 83% males) who were referred to the new 64 slice MSCT laboratory at the American University of Beirut between July 2008 and July 2009. 52% of patients had chest pain and 48% were asymptomatic. By the 2006 ACCF criteria, only 8% of the referrals fitted the "Appropriate" criteria, 49% were "Inappropriate", and 43% were "Uncertain". The percentage of "Appropriate" indications increased from 8% by the 2006 criteria to 38% by the 2010 ACCF criteria. Framingham risk score (FRS) calculation showed a substantial percentage (46%) of patients to be at low risk, with 32% being at intermediate risk, and 22% at high risk. The prevalence of high calcium score (>400) (0% vs 22%, vs 27%, P < .001) and of obstructive CAD (4% vs 23% vs 40%, P < .001) increased steadily across the low, intermediate, and high FRS groups, respectively. There was a significant increase in the percentage of "Appropriate" indications for MSCT when comparing the 2010 to the 2006 ACCF appropriateness criteria. However, in spite of that, there was still significant deviation from the ACCF appropriateness criteria among patients referred for coronary CT angiography in this new MSCT laboratory in a developing country.
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 08/2011; 18(6):1053-8. DOI:10.1007/s12350-011-9437-1 · 2.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Exercise myocardial perfusion imaging (E-MPI) and exercise echocardiography (E-Echo) are thought to be compatible for the non-invasive evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). The interaction of gender and clinical risk profile in the referral of patients to either of these two imaging modalities has not been well studied. This was a prospective study of 922 consecutive patients who were referred for either E-MPI (331 patients) or E-Echo (591 patients) at the American University of Beirut Medical Center in the year of 2008. Men undergoing E-MPI had a higher risk profile than those undergoing E-Echo. They were older (58±12 years versus 55±12 years, p=0.002) and had a higher prevalence of multiple (>2) CAD risk factors (55% versus 37%, p<0.001) as well as a higher prevalence of prior PCI (22% versus 15%, p=0.017) or CABG (12% versus 7%, p=0.016). Furthermore, they achieved lower METS in their exercise (9.4±2.0 versus 10.4±2.3, p<0.001) and had a higher incidence of ischemia and on their scans (16% versus 9.1%, p=0.008). In contrast, women undergoing E-MPI had a similar profile to those undergoing E-Echo in terms of prevalence of risk factors, prior history of coronary events and the prevalence of ischemia or impaired ejection fraction on their scans. There is an important interaction between gender and clinical risk profile in patients undergoing E-MPI versus E-Echo. In men, E-MPI seems to be the preferred test for the higher risk profile patients, whereas in women the two tests are interchangeable.
    International journal of cardiology 11/2010; 145(2):349-50. DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.12.017 · 4.04 Impact Factor