Publications (2)8.89 Total impact
-
Article: Gastrointestinal perforation associated with bevacizumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a large treatment observational cohort study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Bevacizumab prolongs overall and progression-free survival when added to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) occurs in 1-2% of treated patients. We sought to describe the incidence, temporal pattern, outcomes and potential risk factors for GIP in a large, community-based observational cohort study of patients treated with bevacizumab. Baseline patient and tumour characteristics, including potential GIP risk factors, were collected at study entry. Treatment, targeted adverse events, progression events and survival data were recorded every 3 months. Detailed clinical information was collected for all patients experiencing a GIP event. Effects of baseline risk factors on GIP risk were investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Of 1953 evaluable patients followed for a median of 20.1 months, 37 (1.9%) experienced GIP. Most GIP events were surgically managed with successful outcomes; four events were fatal. The majority of GIP events (26/37) occurred ≤6 months after starting bevacizumab (median, 3.35 months). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that age ≥65 years was significantly associated with lower GIP risk. In multivariate analyses, intact primary tumour and prior adjuvant radiotherapy were significantly associated with increased risk of GIP within 6 months after starting bevacizumab. A regression analysis that assessed the risk of GIP over time showed no cumulative risk associated with bevacizumab exposure. The observed rate of GIP in this large, community-based experience was consistent with rates reported in RCTs. Most events were successfully managed with surgical intervention.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 03/2012; 48(8):1126-32. · 4.12 Impact Factor -
Article: Exploring racial differences in outcome and treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a large prospective observational cohort study (BRiTE).
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: African Americans are more likely to be diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer than whites and have shorter survival once they are diagnosed. In this analysis, the authors examined racial differences in clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who received bevacizumab. The study cohort consisted of 1589 white patients (81.4%) and 227 African American patients (11.6%) with mCRC who received front-line bevacizumab therapy and who were enrolled in a large, predominantly community-based, prospective, observational cohort study. Differences in time-to-event endpoints and response rates were examined by race. Differences in the incidence of baseline and treatment-related toxicities associated with bevacizumab also were examined. Finally, differences in patterns of care by race were explored. The median overall survival was 22.6 months for African Americans and 22.9 months for whites, and the median progression-free survival was 9.5 months for African Americans and 9.8 months for whites. Response rates (complete responses plus partial responses) were 37.5% for African Americans and 46.3% for whites (adjusted odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.90). African Americans had higher rates of baseline diabetes (18.9% vs 11%; P = .002), higher rates of hypertension (52.9% vs 41.4%; P = .001), and worsening hypertension while on therapy (13.7% vs 8.9%; P = .02), but no differences in on-treatment arterial thromboembolic events were observed. This large observational cohort study of patients with mCRC demonstrated that, when treated in a similar fashion with modern chemotherapy, African Americans and whites had equivalent cancer outcomes. No significant differences in bevacizumab-related toxicity or patterns of care were observed between African Americans and whites. The lower response rate among African Americans deserves further study.Cancer 07/2011; 118(4):1083-90. · 4.77 Impact Factor
