-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of death in the United States. Angina is encountered frequently in clinical practice. Effective management of patients with coronary artery disease and stable angina should consist of therapy aimed at symptom control and reduction of adverse clinical outcomes. Therapeutic options for angina include antianginal drugs: nitrates, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, ranolazine, and myocardial revascularization. Recent trials have shown that although revascularization is slightly better in controlling symptoms, optimal medical therapy that includes aggressive risk factor modification is equally effective in reducing the risk of future coronary events and death. On the basis of the available data, it seems appropriate to prescribe optimal medical therapy in most patients with coronary artery disease and stable angina, and reserve myocardial revascularization for selected patients with disabling symptoms despite optimal medical therapy.
The American journal of medicine 08/2011; 124(8):681-8. · 4.47 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) is a highly prevalent and complex health problem in the United States. The goals of treatment in patients with stable CAD are to reduce symptoms and thus improve quality of life, reduce myocardial ischemia, and, more importantly, reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and death. In this article, the authors review the evidence regarding the role of medical versus interventional strategies in reducing the risk of future coronary events in patients with stable CAD.
Cardiology clinics 02/2011; 29(1):157-65. · 1.25 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The primary objective of treatment in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and stable angina is relief of symptoms and improvement of clinical outcome. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines have emphasized the role of evidence-based therapies. There have been regular updates of the guidelines, with an effort to include the latest data in the recommendations. Since the 2002 guidelines were published, there have been several pivotal studies that have provided strong support for the role of aggressive and optimal medical therapy in improving clinical outcomes in patients with chronic CAD. Recent data from 2 landmark studies have emphasized that optimal medical therapy is as effective as myocardial revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in reducing risk of adverse clinical outcomes. The 2009-2010 guidelines will likely incorporate the findings of these studies and accordingly modify the recommendations for treatment of patients with chronic CAD and stable angina.
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 01/2009; 10 Suppl 1:S11-20. · 0.58 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Ischemic heart disease is the foremost cause of death in the United States and the developed countries. Stable angina is the initial manifestation of ischemic heart disease in one half of the patients and becomes a recurrent symptom in survivors of myocardial infarction (MI) and other forms of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). There are multiple therapeutic modalities currently available for treatment of anginal symptoms in patients with stable CAD. These include anti-anginal drugs and myocardial revascularization procedures such as coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABGS), percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Anti-anginal drug therapy is based on treatment with nitrates, beta blockers, and calcium channel blockers. A newly approved antianginal drug, ranolazine, is undergoing phase III evaluation. Not infrequently, combination therapy is often necessary for adequate symptom control in some patients with stable angina. However, there has not been a systematic evaluation of individual or combination antianginal drug therapy on hard clinical end points in patients with stable angina. Most revascularization trials that have evaluated treatment with CABGS, PTCA, or PCI in patients with chronic CAD and stable angina have not shown significant improvement in survival or decreased incidence of non-fatal MI compared to medical treatment. In the CABGS trials, various post-hoc analyses have identified several smaller subgroups at high-risk in whom CABGS might improve clinical outcomes. However, there are conflicting findings in different reports and these findings are further compromised due to the heterogeneous groups of patients in these trials. Moreover, no prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) has confirmed an advantage of CABGS, compared to medical treatment, in reduction of hard clinical outcomes in any of the high-risk subgroups. Based on the available data, it appears reasonable to conclude that for most patients (except perhaps in those with presence of left main disease > 50% stenosis) there is no apparent survival benefit of CABGS compared to medical therapy in stable CAD patients with angina. Although these trial have reported better symptom control associated with the revascularization intervention in most patients, this has not been adequately compared using modern medical therapies. Available data from recent studies also suggest treatment with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), a statin and a regular exercise regimen in patients with stable CAD and angina pectoris.
Clinical Cardiology 02/2007; 30(2 Suppl 1):I16-24. · 2.15 Impact Factor
-
Enrique V Carbajal
The American journal of medicine 02/2006; 119(1):91. · 4.47 Impact Factor
-
Enrique V Carbajal
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 01/2006; 294(22):2845; author reply 2845-6. · 30.03 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: NSTE-ACS is a complex clinical event characterized by a variable degree of myocardial ischemia and triggered, in most patients, by a rupture of a vulnerable plaque that leads to acute intraluminal nonocclusive thrombosis. Traditionally, acute management strategies for NSTE-ACS have been aimed at identification of vascular areas with discrete atheroma and revascularization of the affected myocardium. Studies that have evaluated invasive strategies in NSTE-ACS suggest that the rates of hard clinical events are similar for both intensive medical treatment and early invasive management strategies. As shown recently in the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project study, intensive therapy with beta-blockers appears to be a viable management option that has comparable outcomes in most patients with NSTE-ACS. Although several different treatment strategies have been advocated in the management of NSTE-ACS, the available evidence-based information does not fully support some of these traditional approaches. Future prospective, well-controlled trials are needed to fully ascertain the role of invasive and other medical management strategies in patients with NSTE-ACS. Long-term aggressive management of established risk factors for CAD is unquestionably the most prudent and cost-effective therapeutic approach in the long-term management in patients recovering from NSTE-ACS.
Postgraduate Medicine 10/2005; 118(3):23-32. · 1.78 Impact Factor
-
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 12/2002; 288(18):2263; author reply 2263-4. · 30.03 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The anti-ischemic effects of atenolol and nifedipine were compared in a randomized double-blind crossover manner in 24 patients with stable exertional angina and transient silent ischemia during ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring. Both atenolol and nifedipine were effective (p < 0.005) in reducing the average number and duration of transient ischemic events, but therapy with atenolol was associated with a significantly greater reduction in the mean number (p < 0.05) and duration (p < 0.01) of silent ischemic events.Analyses of the silent ischemic activity during the morning hours revealed that only therapy with atenolol produced a significant reduction in the average duration per patient (139 ± 54 vs. 1,609 ± 468 s, p < 0.01) and in the average duration of silent ischemia per event between 6 am and 12 noon (62 ± 21 vs. 208 ± 24 s, p < 0.005). There were fewer adverse experiences during therapy with atenolol.These results show that although both atenolol and nifedipine are effective in reducing silent ischemic events, treatment with atenolol is associated with significantly greater efficacy, particularly on the morning surge of silent myocardial ischemia.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 04/1991; · 14.16 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Silent myocardial ischemia has been shown to occur far more frequently than anginal episodes in patients with coronary artery disease. Both an increase in myocardial oxygen demand and abnormalities of coronary vasomotor tone appear to play a significant role in the genesis of silent ischemia. Recent data show that in excess of 40% of patients with stable angina have frequent episodes of silent ischemia. The presence of silent ischemia predicts an increased risk of coronary events and cardiac death. Based on these data, it has been proposed that anti-ischemic therapy should be directed toward control of total ischemic burden. Although several recent studies have demonstrated efficacy of various antianginal drugs in reducing the number and duration of silent ischemic episodes, none has demonstrated beneficial effect on the associated adverse prognosis.(Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:2373-2382)
Archives of Internal Medicine 151(12):2373-2382. · 11.46 Impact Factor
