Are you Jin Woo Choi?

Claim your profile

Publications (5)2.93 Total impact

  • Article: Comparison of the recovery and respiratory effects of aminophylline and doxapram following total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of aminophylline and doxapram on recovery, respiration, and bispectral index (BIS) values in patients after total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and remifentanil. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial. SETTING: Operating room of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 90 adult, ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy. INTERVENTIONS: TIVA was performed with the induction target of remifentanil 3 ng/mL and propofol 6 μg/mL, followed by the maintenance target of remifentanil 1-3 ng/mL and propofol 3-5 μg/mL at the effect site, and with BIS scores in 40-50 range. Patients were randomized to three groups to receive intravenous (IV) aminophylline 3 mg/kg (n = 30), IV doxapram 1 mg/kg (n = 30), or normal IV saline (control; n = 30). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After administration of the study drugs, return to spontaneous ventilation differed significantly among the three groups. The time to eye opening and hand squeezing on verbal command were similar. The time to extubation was shortened in both the doxapram aminophylline groups (P < 0.05). Tidal volumes were increased in the doxapram group at 5-14 minutes, and the aminophylline group, at 5-12 minutes (P < 0.05). Respiratory rates were increased at 2 to 8 minutes and then showed a decrease at the 12 to 14-minute mark in both the doxapram and aminophylline groups (P < 0.05). No difference was noted between the two groups. BIS values were increased in both the doxapram and aminophylline groups at 4-10 minutes (P < 0.05). Heart rates were increased in the doxapram group for the first 8 minutes, and at 1-2 minutes in the aminophylline group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Aminophylline 3 mg/kg or doxapram 1 mg/kg shortened the time to spontaneous ventilation and improved early recovery from TIVA without appreciable side effects. The more rapid emergence correlates with higher BIS values when compared with the saline control group. The arousal and respiratory effects of aminophylline were comparable to those of doxapram.
    Journal of clinical anesthesia 04/2013; · 1.32 Impact Factor
  • Article: The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The patient-controlled sedation (PCS) allows for rapid individualized titration of sedative drugs. Propofol has been the most widely used IV adjuvant, during the monitored anesthesia care (MAC). This study was designed to compare the sedation quality, side effect and recovery of the propofol alone, and propofol-remifentanil combination, using PCS for breast biopsy. Seventy five outpatients, undergoing breast biopsy procedures with local anesthesia, were randomly assigned to receive propofol alone (group P), propofol-25 ug/ml of remifentanil (group PR25), and propofol-50 ug/ml of remifentanil (group PR50), using PCS. Pain visual analogue scores (VAS) and digit symbol substitution test (DSST), Vital signs, bi-spectral index (BIS) and observer assessment of alertness and sedation (OAA/S) score were recorded. Apply/Demand ratio in the group PR50 had a significant increase over the other groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of excessive sedation and dizziness were significantly more frequent in the group PR50 (P < 0.05). BIS and OAA/S score significantly decreased in the group PR25, PR50 at 15 min after the operation, the end of surgery (P < 0.05). At 5 min after the start of PCS, patients in the group PR25 and PR50 gave significantly less correct responses on the DSST than that of the group P (P < 0.05). Compared with the propofol alone, intermittent bolus injection of propofol-remifentanil mixture could be used, appropriately, for the sedation and analgesia during MAC. The group PR25 in a low dose of remifentanil has more advantages in terms of sedation and satisfaction because of the group PR50's side effects.
    Korean journal of anesthesiology 11/2012; 63(5):431-5.
  • Source
    Article: Hepatic ischemic preconditioning provides protection against distant renal ischemia and reperfusion injury in mice.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We previously demonstrated that there are acute and delayed phases of renal protection against renal ischemia and reperfusion (IR) injury with renal ischemic preconditioning (IPC). This study assessed whether hepatic IPC could also reduce distant renal IR injury through the blood stream-mediated supply of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into four groups: group I, sham operated including right nephrectomy; group II (IR), left renal ischemia for 30 min and reperfusion injury; group III (IPC-IR), hepatic ischemia for 10 min followed by 10 min of reperfusion before left renal IR injury; group IV (MPG - IPC + IR), pretreated with 100 mg/kg N-(2-mercaptopropionyl)-glycine (MPG) 15 min before hepatic IPC and left renal IR injury. Renal function, histopathologic findings, proinflammatory cytokines, and cytoprotective proteins were evaluated 15 min or 24 hr after reperfusion. Hepatic IPC attenuated the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor α, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, and induced inducible nitric-oxide synthase, and the phosphorylation of Akt in the murine kidney. Renal function was better preserved in mice with hepatic IPC (group III) than groups II or IV. Hepatic IPC protects against distant renal IR injury through the blood stream-delivery of hepatic IPC-induced ROS, by inducing cytoprotective proteins, and by inhibiting inflammatory reactions.
    Journal of Korean medical science 05/2012; 27(5):547-52. · 0.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Efficacy of epidural analgesia in patients with cancer pain: a retrospective observational study.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pain in terminal cancer patients may be refractory to systemic analgesics or associated with adverse drug reactions to analgesics. Epidural analgesia has been effectively used in such patients for pain control. However, this method does not provide pain relief to all patients. The efficacy and complications of continuous epidural analgesia were evaluated for expanding efficacy in terminal cancer patients. The charts of patients who received epidural analgesia for over 5 years for the control of terminal cancer pain were reviewed retrospectively. Ninety-six patients received 127 epidural catheters. The mean duration for epidural catheterization was 31.5±55.6 (5-509) days. The dose of epidural morphine increased by 3.5% per day. The efficacy of epidural analgesia at 2 weeks follow up revealed improved pain control (n=56), as the morphine equivalent drug dose dropped from 213.4 mg/day to 94.1 mg/day (p<0.05) at 2 weeks follow up. Accordingly, after 2 weeks institution of epidural analgesia, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of patients with severe pain, from 78.1% to 19.6% (p<0.05). Epidural analgesia was an effective pain control method in patients with terminal cancer pain, however, a systematized algorithm for the control of cancer-related pain in needed.
    Yonsei medical journal 05/2012; 53(3):649-53. · 0.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Severe hypotension and water intoxication developed after an accidental oxytocin overdose in a morbidly obese patient undergoing cesarean section -A case report-.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present a 32-year-old, extremely obese, pregnant woman who developed severe hypotension and water intoxication after an accidental injection of large bolus of oxytocin during cesarean section under general anesthesia. The patient was initially thought to have an amniotic fluid embolism because of the abrupt hemodynamic changes developed immediately after fetal delivery and lack of recognition of medication error. It is highly recommended that careful attention should be paid not only to the possibility of hemodynamic deterioration and water intoxication if oxytocin is given rapidly in excessive doses, but to the confirmation of the proper use of the drug before it is injected.
    Korean journal of anesthesiology 04/2011; 60(4):290-3.