Jenny Lewis

Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Are you Jenny Lewis?

Claim your profile

Publications (3)8.03 Total impact

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim  Previous studies have shown the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) in the management of ambulant individuals with cerebral palsy (CP). There is little evidence on its use in non-ambulant children with CP. This review aimed to investigate indications and efficacy for BoNT-A use in managing pain, care, and comfort, and improving function in children with CP in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels IV and V. Method  Electronic databases were searched from the earliest available date to June 2012 using a combination of subject headings and free text. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies with (1) participants aged 18 or under, (2) participants with CP in GMFCS levels IV and V, (3) participants receiving BoNT-A treatment, and (4) studies published in English-language peer-reviewed journals. Results  The search resulted in a total of 814 studies, of which 19 met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies provided level IV or V evidence and one level I evidence according to the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine guidelines for the development of systematic reviews. Most of the studies were of weak to moderate methodological quality. Interpretation  The evidence that BoNT-A is effective in reducing postoperative pain in children with CP in GMCFS levels IV and V is limited, with only one level I study identified. Remaining indications were general pain reduction, maintaining hip integrity, achieving functional changes, and goal attainment. A high percentage of participants in the studies showed positive changes in these areas. With the poor level of evidence of the included studies, no definite conclusion could be drawn on the indications for BoNT-A use in children with CP in GMCFS levels IV and V. Further investigation by rigorous studies is required.
    Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 10/2012; · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 11/2011; 53(11):1062-3. · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies on the use of intrathecal baclofen (ITB) for ambulant adults with spasticity and/or dystonia of cerebral origin are scarce, and are even more limited for children and adolescents. This systematic review investigates the use of ITB to improve walking, transfer ability, and gross motor activities in ambulant children and adolescents with spasticity and/or dystonia of cerebral origin. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, full Cochrane Library, and PEDro) were searched from the earliest date available until March 2011 using combined subject headings and free text if supported by the databases. Studies were included if they had examined individuals who: (1) received ITB therapy by any method (bolus injection, an external delivery system, or an implanted pump); (2) had spasticity and/or dystonia of cerebral origin; (3) were able to ambulate with or without a walking device, i.e. individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) who were in levels I to III of the Gross Motor Function Classification System or individuals with similar functional mobility if they did not have CP; and (4) were aged 18 years or under. Publications in English in peer-reviewed journals reporting any type of research design, except reviews and expert opinions, were included. Studies were excluded if participants had spasticity and/or dystonia of spinal origin and if baclofen was administered only orally. Studies that compared ITB with other interventions such as botulinum toxin were also excluded. Two independent reviewers scored 16 studies against the guidelines for developing systematic reviews from the American Academy of Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM). Fifteen studies were of levels IV or V evidence and only one of level II according to the evidence levels of the AACPDM guidelines, but all were of low quality. No study was found on the use of ITB in ambulant children or adolescents with dystonia of cerebral origin. Not all studies used objective outcome measures to assess the ambulation, transfer ability, and gross motor activities of the participants. A proportion of participants showed improvement in all these areas but adverse events were common. A proportion of participants compromised their ambulatory and transfer abilities after ITB. There was no evidence to support the clinical use of ITB in ambulant individuals with hypertonicity without further rigorous longitudinal studies.
    Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 06/2011; 53(10):885-95. · 2.68 Impact Factor