-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Universal antifungal prophylaxis with azoles is commonly used after lung transplantation. We noted an increase in isolates of Aspergillus calidoustus in our transplant population and hypothesized that increasing azole use (universal prophylaxis since 2008) may be promoting this infection.
Clinical and microbiologic data for A. calidoustus cases from 2008 to 2011 were extracted from chart review. For lung transplant patients, a case-control study was performed to determine risk factors, and incidence rates were calculated.
From 2008 to 2011, we identified seven organ transplant recipients and one hematopoietic stem-cell transplant patient with positive A. calidoustus culture results in bronchoalveolar lavage at a median of 13 months after transplantation (interquartile range, 4-39 months). Chest computed tomographic scan was consistent with fungal infection in six of eight patients, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group criteria classified these as "probable" invasive aspergillosis. In the case-control study, there were no differences in immunosuppression, number of respiratory samples taken, length of intensive care unit stay, or rejection rates. Of controls, 33.3% received third-generation azole prophylaxis compared with 83.3% of cases (P=0.13). However, median duration of exposure was greater in cases than in controls (3 vs. 0 months, P=0.045). Fungal minimum inhibitory concentration for voriconazole was 4 µg/mL or greater for six of eight cases. Incidence rates in lung transplants showed an increase of A. calidoustus (0/1000 vs. 11.3/1000 patient-years in 2006-2007 and 2008-2011, respectively; P=0.018), whereas Aspergillus fumigatus cases decreased (73.9/1000 vs. 49.0/1000 patient-years, P=0.0066).
Pulmonary A. calidoustus seems to be an emerging pathogen mainly in lung transplants. We suggest that third-generation azole use reduced the incidence of A. fumigatus, but the incidence of A. calidoustus, an azole-resistant fungus, was increased.
Transplantation 07/2012; 94(4):403-10. · 4.00 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To assess the use of patient-reported outcome (PROs) measures in the routine clinical care of lung-heart transplant patients. We assessed whether the addition of PROs in routine clinical care affected the duration of the consultation and patient's and clinician's views.
Consecutive lung-heart transplant patients visiting the outpatient clinic, University of Alberta Hospital, completed the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) and the Health Utilities Index (HUI) on touchscreen computers. Information on the patient's responses was made available to the members of the transplant team prior to the encounter with the patient. The duration of clinical encounters was noted. At the end of every visit, clinicians completed a questionnaire on the usefulness of having PRO information available. After 6 months patients completed a survey of their experiences.
The final patient sample consisted of 172 patients with a mean (SD) age of 52 (13.3) years old; 47% were female; 68% were organ recipients and 32% candidates. The transplant team, comprising four pulmunologists, two nurses, and one pharmacist had an average of 9 years of practical experience in pulmunology. The mean duration of patient-clinician encounters in minutes was 15.15 (4.52). Ninety-eight percent of patients indicated that they would be happy to complete the CRQ and HUI at every clinic visit. Ninety-one percent of the assessments completed by clinicians showed complete satisfaction with the use of PROs in routine practice. Further, the clinicians developed guidelines for the use of PRO information in clinical practice.
The incorporation of PRO measures in the routine clinical care of lung-heart transplant patients resulted in a reduction of the duration of patient-clinician encounters. The experience was well accepted by patients and clinicians. We conclude that the routine use of PROs in lung-heart transplant patients has become standard practice.
Patient Related Outcome Measures 07/2010; 1:93-105.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The lung transplantation program at the University of Alberta has been in existence for 25 years. The current volume is 35-40 new lung transplants per year. We offer single-lung, bilateral lung, heart/lung and bilateral living lobar transplantation as options. Experience has allowed for widening of the indications and acceptance of patients with more risk. Donor evaluation and management has allowed for extended donors to be included in the donor pool. Results will likely continue to improve with increased understanding of the mechanisms and management of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Our research interests have been in the areas of risk analysis, outcome assessment, and quality of life changes from transplantation.
Clinical transplants 01/2010;
