Matthew G Seetin

University Center Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA

Are you Matthew G Seetin?

Claim your profile

Publications (4)18.08 Total impact

  • Article: RNAstructure: web servers for RNA secondary structure prediction and analysis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RNAstructure is a software package for RNA secondary structure prediction and analysis. This contribution describes a new set of web servers to provide its functionality. The web server offers RNA secondary structure prediction, including free energy minimization, maximum expected accuracy structure prediction and pseudoknot prediction. Bimolecular secondary structure prediction is also provided. Additionally, the server can predict secondary structures conserved in either two homologs or more than two homologs. Folding free energy changes can be predicted for a given RNA structure using nearest neighbor rules. Secondary structures can be compared using circular plots or the scoring methods, sensitivity and positive predictive value. Additionally, structure drawings can be rendered as SVG, postscript, jpeg or pdf. The web server is freely available for public use at: http://rna.urmc.rochester.edu/RNAstructureWeb.
    Nucleic Acids Research 04/2013; · 8.03 Impact Factor
  • Article: TurboKnot: rapid prediction of conserved RNA secondary structures including pseudoknots.
    Matthew G Seetin, David H Mathews
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: MOTIVATION: Many RNA molecules function without being translated into proteins, and function depends on structure. Pseudoknots are motifs in RNA secondary structures that are difficult to predict but are also often functionally important. RESULTS: TurboKnot is a new algorithm for predicting the secondary structure, including pseudoknotted pairs, conserved across multiple sequences. TurboKnot finds 81.6% of all known base pairs in the systems tested, and 75.6% of predicted pairs were found in the known structures. Pseudoknots are found with half or better of the false-positive rate of previous methods.
    Bioinformatics 01/2012; 28(6):792-8. · 5.47 Impact Factor
  • Article: RNA structure prediction: an overview of methods.
    Matthew G Seetin, David H Mathews
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RNA is now appreciated to serve numerous cellular roles, and understanding RNA structure is important for understanding a mechanism of action. This contribution discusses the methods available for predicting RNA structure. Secondary structure is the set of the canonical base pairs, and secondary structure can be accurately determined by comparative sequence analysis. Secondary structure can also be predicted. The most commonly used method is free energy minimization. The accuracy of structure prediction is improved either by using experimental mapping data or by predicting a structure conserved in a set of homologous sequences. Additionally, tertiary structure, the three-dimensional arrangement of atoms, can be modeled with guidance from comparative analysis and experimental techniques. New approaches are also available for predicting tertiary structure.
    Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 01/2012; 905:99-122.
  • Article: Automated RNA tertiary structure prediction from secondary structure and low-resolution restraints.
    Matthew G Seetin, David H Mathews
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A novel protocol for all-atom RNA tertiary structure prediction is presented that uses restrained molecular mechanics and simulated annealing. The restraints are from secondary structure, covariation analysis, coaxial stacking predictions for helices in junctions, and, when available, cross-linking data. Results are demonstrated on the Alu domain of the mammalian signal recognition particle RNA, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae phenylalanine tRNA, the hammerhead ribozyme, the hepatitis C virus internal ribosomal entry site, and the P4-P6 domain of the Tetrahymena thermophila group I intron. The predicted structure is selected from a pool of decoy structures with a score that maximizes radius of gyration and base-base contacts, which was empirically found to select higher quality decoys. This simple ab initio approach is sufficient to make good predictions of the structure of RNAs compared to current crystal structures using both root mean square deviation and the accuracy of base-base contacts. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2011.
    Journal of Computational Chemistry 04/2011; · 4.58 Impact Factor