Are you Kathryn Rzetelski-West?

Claim your profile

Publications (2)5.22 Total impact

  • Article: Prostate weight is the preferred measure of prostate size in radical prostatectomy cohorts.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the accuracy of calculated prostate volume variables in a radical prostatectomy (RP) cohort, as many recent studies use these measures of prostate size instead of prostate weight. To determine whether this accuracy could be improved by modifying the mathematical model used in the volume estimation. Patients who underwent RP for prostate cancer at our associated institutions had calculated specimen volumes and weights from RP specimens determined at one pathology institution and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) volumes were recorded preoperatively (n= 236). Correlation analysis was performed and errors were determined for calculated volume variables when compared with prostate weight. Bland-Altman plots were drawn and concordance coefficients calculated. Analysis was repeated with smaller prostates mathematically modelled as bullet-shaped rather than ellipsoid (n= 165). Although correlation was good for both TRUS and specimen volumes, they equally underestimated prostate weight with a large range of errors and poor concordance coefficients. Only 22% of TRUS volumes and 11% of calculated specimen volumes were within 10% of weight measurements. Application of a bullet-shaped mathematical model for prostates <55 g did not correct the large individual variation seen within these values. Calculated prostate volume variables are prone to a large range of individual error regardless of the mathematical model used and should be avoided in statistical studies involving RP cohorts, and the more accurate prostate weight variable should instead be used as a size variable or correction factor.
    BJU International 04/2012; 109 Suppl 3:57-63. · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • Article: Prostate tumour volume is an independent predictor of early biochemical recurrence in a high risk radical prostatectomy subgroup.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess if accurately determined tumour volume variables could serve as independent predictors of early biochemical recurrence in high risk prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Tumour volume variables were calculated by digital planimetry in 269 prostatectomy specimens of patients with high risk prostate cancer. The associations to biochemical progression of tumour volume and clinicopathological variables, including age, pre-operative prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, final Gleason score, pathological T stage, and surgical margins, were examined using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses. Median tumour volume was 3.7 ml [interquartile range (IQR) 2.1-6.1 mL] and median follow-up time was 12 months (IQR 6-24 months). Biochemical recurrence occurred in 64 men (24%) during this period, with a median time to recurrence of 7.5 months (IQR 3.0-15.5 months). On univariate analysis all of the tumour volume variables were strongly correlated with the clinicopathological variables, as well as biochemical recurrence (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, we found that tumour volume variables served as independent predictors of PSA progression whilst other routinely reported pathological variables did not. Accurately assessing tumour volume in the high risk setting may aid in identifying patients at greatest risk of developing early biochemical recurrence and most in need of adjuvant therapy.
    Pathology 02/2011; 43(2):138-42. · 2.38 Impact Factor