-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Although antimuscarinic drugs are being used with increasing frequency in clinical practice for the purposes of mydriasis and cycloplegia, the extent of their actions varies considerably between different compounds. Investigation of the binding characteristics of these agents revealed that as their reported clinical potency increased, so did their specific binding affinity for muscarinic receptors in the iris sphincter and ciliary muscle and their nonspecific binding affinity for melanin pigment. However, the affinity of each drug for melanin pigment was much lower than for the muscarinic receptors. Therefore, although binding to melanin can significantly influence the overall response, differences in the clinical effect of various compounds appear to be primarily due to their differences in specific affinity for muscarinic binding sites.
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics 07/1999; 15(3):257-69. · 1.51 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Responses to topically applied ocular drugs vary between patients. The volume of drug instilled is of particular importance as one of many sources of response variation, but the reliability of drop volume from eye drop bottles is unknown. Hence, the repeatability of drop volume and factors affecting this for a variety of drug manufacturers were considered in this study.
Nineteen bottles, one from each primary manufacturer in the UK, were examined. The mass of all drops expelled from each bottle was measured with respect to the bottle type, handling angle, drop number, drug and concentration. The accuracy (repeatability and trueness) of drops from each bottle was also evaluated.
Drop volume varied significantly between drug manufacturers, ranging from 33.8 microliters to 63.4 microliters. The handling angle of the bottle also influenced drop volume, with angles less than 60 degrees giving smaller drops. Drop number exhibited no significant effect upon drop volume. However, the drug type and its concentration did significantly affect the volume of the drop expelled from the bottle, with higher concentrations giving rise to larger drops. Repeatability coefficients across the range of bottles varied between +/- 2.24 microliters and +/- 10.76 microliters (mean +/- 5.07 microliters).
It is well reported that drug volume instilled has a significant effect on the degree of response. However, there are currently no official regulations concerning eye drop volume in either the UK or the USA. Since drop volume has been shown to vary significantly depending upon a variety of factors, it may be appropriate that the regulatory bodies consider the consequences of variable drop size.
Eye 02/1999; 13 ( Pt 1):93-100. · 1.85 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Evaluation of pupil diameter is used in many clinical and research fields to aid diagnosis of neurological disorders and to monitor pharmacological effects upon the eye. Methods used to determine pupillary diameter have evolved from simple scale measurements to much more complex systems, supposedly improving accuracy and repeatability. However, many techniques are restricted to the consulting room or research laboratory due to the size of the equipment, its cost, or the expertise required. We have evaluated a portable pupillometer originally developed by Broca, capable of precise measurements on fixed, dilated pupils, that has the potential to be used by unsupervised patients. Luminance levels will still need to be controlled because, although luminance does not influence the mechanics of the pupillometer itself, it significantly affects the natural pupil. The pinhole size should ideally be 1.1 mm in diameter, since smaller pinholes underestimate and larger holes overestimate pupil size. The pupillometer also exhibited reasonable accuracy in fixed pupils dilated with tropicamide. Pupil measurements were overestimated by 0.5% using the 1.1 mm pinholes (insignificant if the pupil can be measured to the nearest 0.25 mm) and both intra- and inter-visit repeatabilities were relatively good. The results from this study therefore indicate that the pinhole pupillometer may be of use in pupil research, since it facilitates more frequent pupillary measurements over much longer time intervals than are currently achievable.
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 12/1998; 18(6):484-94. · 1.58 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Iris colour can provide an enormous amount of information about an individual. In addition to changes with pathological conditions, the colour of the iris can be a particularly useful indicator of how well a person will respond to a topically applied ocular drug. Until recently, classification of iris colour has been subjective, ranging from a basic description ('light' and 'dark') to more detailed grading systems, such as a comparison with preset photographic standards. However, variability within observers and differences in the interpretation between observers can influence the results. Objective techniques, in this respect, possess several advantages. They are able to detect differences in colour that subjective techniques are incapable of and they provide continuous data rather than discrete categories, thus improving the accuracy of drug response predictions. This study assessed iris colour by objective means. Slit-lamp photographs of various coloured irides were taken under standardised conditions. The slides were then scanned into a computer and the colour analysed using a calibrated software package. To establish the optimum colour parameter to be used for predictions of drug response, several parameters were calculated and compared with the subject response to 1% tropicamide (maximum change in pupil size, time to maximum change and total duration of effect). Many parameters had strong correlations with drug response, but the parameters 'z', 'b' (the proportion of blue in the image) and 'y' (the proportion of yellow in the image) were found to exhibit the highest correlations. They also showed better correlations with drug response than did a current iris colour grading system.
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 04/1998; 18(2):103-10. · 1.58 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The method of using an optical spherometer and a lens thickness gauge, in combination with a pillar and collar, has previously been shown to be repeatable and accurate (to 0.01 mm) in measuring the edge lift of rigid monocurve lenses.
This paper goes on to validate the technique for measurements taken on edge-finished multicurve rigid lenses.
The axial edge lift (AEL) of a series of multicurve rigid lenses having known values of AEL was measured using an optical spherometer, a thickness gauge, and contact lens V gauge in a similar way as was described in the companion paper.
The results show that as long as a correction factor of 0.01 mm is applied, as found in the previous paper, the technique will allow satisfactory verification of the edge lift.
The technique is accurate and reproducible, even in multicurve lens designs, provided that a calibrating correction factor of 0.01 mm is applied to account for methodological error. It will also indirectly allow the accuracy of manufacture of the peripheral curves and diameters of any rigid contact lens to be verified.
Optometry and Vision Science 03/1998; 75(3):217-20. · 2.11 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The clinical importance of the edge lift of rigid contact lenses is often neglected, possibly due to previous difficulties in its measurement. A new method of measuring axial edge lift (AEL) and radial edge lift (REL) using standard contact lens verification equipment, such as an optical spherometer, a thickness gauge, and contact lens V gauge, is described.
The technique was validated for trueness (accuracy) and precision (repeatability) by measuring the edge lift of a number of monocurve lenses, manufactured both with and without a normal edge finish.
Edge lift was measured to an accuracy of 0.01 mm.
As long as a mean of eight independent measurements of back optic zone radius (BOZR), sagitta, and one measurement of center thickness are taken, the pillar and collar technique is capable of producing accurate and repeatable measurements of the edge lift of a rigid contact lens.
Optometry and Vision Science 03/1998; 75(3):208-16. · 2.11 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Variations in response to topically applied ocular drugs (e.g. mydriatics and cycloplegics) and their possible aetiology have been studied previously. It appears that individual patient differences, external influencing factors and the characteristics of the particular drug may all govern the response. One factor worthy of note in this regard is the possibility of variation in the drug volume instilled. Single-use eye drop containers known as Minims are commonly used during ophthalmic diagnostic procedures. However, in this study the drop volume was shown to vary considerably, depending upon the angle at which the Minims container was held, the particular drug and the number of drops previously expelled from the unit.
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 06/1997; 17(3):196-204. · 1.58 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the ability of Displacement Threshold Hyperacuity (DTH) in predicting the postoperative visual outcome in patients awaiting cataract surgery and discriminating between the relative performance of the neural and optical components of the visual system. To establish eventually the cut-off DTH values to be used clinically in the preoperative evaluation of patients with cataract.
Forty-five subjects admitted for extracapsular cataract extraction with implant were examined preoperatively and postoperatively. In addition to DTH, logMAR visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity, and a cataract classification system were used to obtain a more comprehensive assessment of the patient's visual performance.
DTH was found to be sensitive to decreased macular function but relatively unaffected by the severity of the cataract; higher thresholds were associated with denser opacities. A preoperative threshold of 50 seconds of arc was found to be the upper limit under which normal macular function is likely. DTH sensitivity and specificity for decreased macular function was 1.00 and 0.8, respectively.
If preoperative DTH is 50 seconds of arc or lower, the subject will achieve a postoperative logMAR VA better than 0.3 (Snellen equivalent 20/40). On the contrary, higher DTH seems to give no reliable information about the patient's visual function.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 04/1995; 36(3):686-91. · 3.60 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The clinician involved in cataract assessment is often faced with a deterioration in visual performance which may or may not be totally attributable to the cataract. Neural changes may occur concurrently and contribute toward the reduced performance. This paper reviews the methods which attempt to discriminate between changes due to cataract development and changes produced by neural degeneration. New techniques have been developed with more emphasis on quantitative rather than qualitative assessment. These techniques are discussed critically with particular reference to their ability to distinguish between the contributions of optical and neural change. This has particular application in predicting the visual outcome after cataract surgery.
Optometry and Vision Science 12/1993; 70(11):903-13. · 2.11 Impact Factor
-
Eye 02/1991; 5 ( Pt 5):601-6. · 1.85 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Among the 80 subjects who were recruited with normal retinal and neural function, 54 had cataract and a visual acuity (VA) better than 6/24. The 26 age-matched subjects had clear media. Contrast sensitivity (CS) at low and intermediate spatial frequencies was measured using the Pelli-Robson letter chart. Two measures of glare disability (GD) were obtained using the Mentor Brightness Acuity Tester (BAT) in conjunction with a logMAR VA chart and the Pelli-Robson chart. Although CS is predominantly affected at high spatial frequencies in early cataract, we found that some subjects had reduced scores on the Pelli-Robson chart. This CS loss could not be predicted from VA measurements and was particularly found in subjects with posterior subcapsular cataract. High GD scores were found in a number of subjects with relatively good VA and could not be predicted from results of VA or CS. We suggest that CS and GD measurements using the Pelli-Robson chart and the BAT provide valuable information regarding the management of patients with early cataract.
Optometry and Vision Science 12/1990; 67(11):822-5. · 2.11 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Conventional techniques for assessing the visual function of cataract patients include visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity (CS) and glare disability (GD). The extent to which these measurements provide accurate information about a patient's perceived visual disability is not known. In this study, binocular and monocular VA and CS and monocular GD measurements were made using commercially available techniques on 33 cataract patients. VA was measured using a Ferris-Bailey LogMAR chart and CS by the Pelli-Robson letter CS chart. Glare disability was measured using the Mentor Brightness Acuity Tester in conjunction with both the LogMAR and Pelli Robson charts. Each patient's perceived visual disability was quantified using a 20-point questionnaire about the effect of vision on everyday activities. There was little correlation between subjective visual disability and monocular or binocular VA measurements. Measurements of binocular CS, however, were highly correlated with the patient's perceived visual disability, particularly their subjective assessment of the effect of vision on their mobility-orientation. We suggest that binocular CS measurements using the Pelli-Robson chart provide useful additional information regarding the need for surgery in cataract patients.
Eye 02/1990; 4 ( Pt 5):712-7. · 1.85 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The efficacy of a new clinical instrument which measures light backscatter from the crystalline lens--the Opacity Lensmeter 701--was assessed. Repeated measurements were made on 83 normal subjects in the age range 15 to 82 years, and on 38 eyes of subjects with cataract but normal retinal and neural function. The cataract scores were compared against results of Logmar visual acuity (VA) and glare disability measurements from the same subjects. The Lensmeter was found to be simple to use and gave quick, repeatable, objective measurements of light backscatter. Scores correlated well with normal age changes in noncataractous lenses and in cataracts of pure nuclear morphology, but not in cortical or posterior subcapsular cataracts.
Optometry and Vision Science 06/1989; 66(5):257-63. · 2.11 Impact Factor
