Are you Ichiro Takahashi?

Claim your profile

Publications (2)6.56 Total impact

  • Article: The primary site of the acrocephalic feature in Apert Syndrome is a dwarf cranial base with accelerated chondrocytic differentiation due to aberrant activation of the FGFR2 signaling.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Activation of osteoblastic bone anabolism in the calvarial sutures is considered to be the essential pathologic condition underlying mutant FGFR2-related craniofacial dysostosis. However, early clinical investigations indicated that abnormal cartilage development in the cranial base was rather a primary site of abnormal feature in Apert Syndrome (AS). To examine the significance of cartilaginous growth of the cranial base in AS, we generated a transgenic mouse bearing AS-type mutant Fgfr2IIIc under the control of the Col2a1 promoter-enhancer (Fgfr2IIIc(P253R) mouse). Despite the lacking expression of Fgfr2IIIc(P253R) in osteoblasts, exclusive disruption of chondrocytic differentiation and growth reproduced AS-like acrocephaly accompanied by short anterior cranial base with fusion of the cranial base synchondroses, maxillary hypoplasia and synostosis of the calvarial sutures with no significant abnormalities in the trunk and extremities. Gene expression analyses demonstrated upregulation of p21, Ihh and Mmp-13 accompanied by modest increase in expression of Sox9 and Runx2, indicating acceleration of chondrocytic maturation and hypertrophy in the cranial base of the Fgfr2IIIc(P253R) mice. Furthermore, an acquired affinity and specificity of mutant FGFR2IIIc(P253R) receptor with FGF2 and FGF10 is suggested as a mechanism of activation of FGFR2 signaling selectively in the cranial base. In this report, we strongly suggest that the acrocephalic feature of AS is not alone a result of the coronal suture synostosis, but is a result of the primary disturbance in growth of the cranial base with precocious endochondral ossification.
    Bone 12/2010; 48(4):847-56. · 4.02 Impact Factor
  • Article: Positionally‐dependent chondrogenesis induced by BMP4 is co‐regulated by sox9 and msx2
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cranial neural crest cells emigrate from the posterior midbrain and anterior hindbrain to populate the first branchial arch and eventually differentiate into multiple cell lineages in the maxilla and mandible during craniofacial morphogenesis. In the developing mouse mandibular process, the expression profiles of BMP4, Msx2, Sox9, and type II collagen demonstrate temporally and spatially restrictive localization patterns suggestive of their functions in the patterning and differentiation of cartilage. Under serumless culture conditions, beads soaked in BMP4 and implanted into embryonic day 10 (E10) mouse mandibular explants induced ectopic cartilage formation in the proximal position of the explant. However, BMP4-soaked beads implanted at the rostral position did not have an inductive effect. Ectopic chondrogenesis was associated with the up-regulation of Sox9 and Msx2 expression in the immediate vicinity of the BMP4 beads 24 hours after implantation. Control beads had no effect on cartilage induction or Msx2 and Sox9 expression. Sox9 was induced at all sites of BMP4 bead implantation. In contrast, Msx2 expression was induced more intensely at the rostral position when compared with the proximal position, and suggested that Msx2 expression was inhibitory to chondrogenesis. To test the hypothesis that over-expression of Msx2 inhibits chondrogenesis, we ectopically expressed Msx2 in the mandibular process organ culture system using adenovirus gene delivery strategy. Microinjection of the Msx2-adenovirus to the proximal position inhibited BMP4-induced chondrogenesis. Over-expression of Msx2 also resulted in the abrogation of endogenous cartilage and the down-regulation of type II collagen expression. Taken together, these results suggest that BMP4 induces chondrogenesis, the pattern of which is positively regulated by Sox9 and negatively by Msx2. Chondrogenesis only occurs at sites where Sox9 expression is high relative to that of Msx2. The combinatorial action of these transcription factors appear to establish a threshold for Sox9 function and thereby restricts the position of chondrogenesis. Dev Den;217:401–414. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
    Developmental Dynamics 03/2000; 217(4):401 - 414. · 2.54 Impact Factor