P Baliga

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

Are you P Baliga?

Claim your profile

Publications (29)91.59 Total impact

  • Article: The use of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in solid organ transplant patients: a case series
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DAA), a recombinant human activated protein C, is indicated for the reduction of mortality in patients with severe sepsis who have a high risk of death. In the initial trial, DAA demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality at 28 days for patients treated with DAA in comparison with standard supportive treatment (placebo). However, solid organ transplant recipients were excluded from the study. Transplant recipients are at an increased risk for sepsis and there is minimal literature describing the safety and efficacy of DAA in the transplant population.Methods. Thirteen solid organ transplant recipients who received DAA between November 2001 and January 2004 were included in this case series. Patients were prospectively identified and data collection occurred concurrently and by retrospective chart review. All patients met the DAA use criteria based on the institutional standard protocol.Results. We report the outcomes of the 13 adult transplant patients who received a total of 14 courses of DAA for severe sepsis. At the time of DAA initiation, all patients required mechanical ventilation, 86% necessitated vasopressor support, and had a median of 3 dysfunctional organs. The median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score at initiation was 30. Overall, hemodynamic stability and APACHE II score improved at the end of DAA infusion. Causes of early discontinuation were bleeding (57%), scheduled procedure (14%), increased international normalized ratio (14%), and death (14%). In-hospital, 28-day, and 1-year mortality was 69%, 62%, and 83%, respectively.Conclusion. DAA appears to be safe with appropriate monitoring. However, transplant recipients had a higher incidence of bleeding events leading to early discontinuation of DAA. Efficacy is difficult to assess without an appropriate control group for comparison.
    Transplant Infectious Disease 05/2009; 11(3):269 - 276. · 2.22 Impact Factor
  • Article: The use of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in solid organ transplant patients: a case series.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DAA), a recombinant human activated protein C, is indicated for the reduction of mortality in patients with severe sepsis who have a high risk of death. In the initial trial, DAA demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality at 28 days for patients treated with DAA in comparison with standard supportive treatment (placebo). However, solid organ transplant recipients were excluded from the study. Transplant recipients are at an increased risk for sepsis and there is minimal literature describing the safety and efficacy of DAA in the transplant population. Thirteen solid organ transplant recipients who received DAA between November 2001 and January 2004 were included in this case series. Patients were prospectively identified and data collection occurred concurrently and by retrospective chart review. All patients met the DAA use criteria based on the institutional standard protocol. We report the outcomes of the 13 adult transplant patients who received a total of 14 courses of DAA for severe sepsis. At the time of DAA initiation, all patients required mechanical ventilation, 86% necessitated vasopressor support, and had a median of 3 dysfunctional organs. The median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score at initiation was 30. Overall, hemodynamic stability and APACHE II score improved at the end of DAA infusion. Causes of early discontinuation were bleeding (57%), scheduled procedure (14%), increased international normalized ratio (14%), and death (14%). In-hospital, 28-day, and 1-year mortality was 69%, 62%, and 83%, respectively. DAA appears to be safe with appropriate monitoring. However, transplant recipients had a higher incidence of bleeding events leading to early discontinuation of DAA. Efficacy is difficult to assess without an appropriate control group for comparison.
    Transplant Infectious Disease 05/2009; 11(3):269-76. · 2.22 Impact Factor
  • Article: Hepatopulmonary syndrome occurring after orthotopic liver transplantation.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) is an infrequent complication of liver cirrhosis. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has gained increasing acceptance as a treatment modality for HPS, although there have been reports of HPS developing after OLT with documented recurrence of cirrhosis. We describe the case of a 9-year-old boy who underwent OLT at 7 months of age because of biliary atresia. He subsequently developed HPS in the setting of chronic rejection without cirrhosis or evidence of portal hypertension. Re-OLT resulted in resolution of HPS and a good clinical outcome.
    Liver Transplantation 01/2002; 7(12):1081-4. · 3.39 Impact Factor
  • Article: Endoscopic treatment of post-liver transplantation biliary leaks with stent placement across the leak site.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Biliary tract leaks occur in over 10% of patients undergoing liver transplantation and are the most common cause of biliary tract-related death in these patients. A number of treatment options are available, but a standard approach has not been established. Twenty-six patients were retrospectively studied who had post-transplantation leaks develop with special reference to those who underwent endoscopic placement of a "leak-bridging" stent. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was performed in all cases with no procedure-related complications. Twenty-four patients had a leak-bridging stent, 1 a transpapillary stent, and 1 a nasobiliary drain. Leak resolution occurred in 23 cases (88%) after initial stent placement. The median time to stent removal was 8 weeks. Three patients did not respond to initial treatment; 2 were successfully treated with another stent and a single patient required surgical repair. Four deaths occurred during follow-up, all unrelated to the biliary leak. Placement of a leak-bridging stent is a safe and effective initial treatment for post-liver transplantation biliary leaks.
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 11/2001; 54(4):471-5. · 4.88 Impact Factor
  • Article: Cadaveric renal transplantation in African-Americans in South Carolina.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The renal transplant program at the MUSC was established in 1968 and is the only transplant center in South Carolina. It serves a large population of African American patients who constitute nearly two-thirds of the waiting list and more than half of all renal transplants. Between 1968-2000, 969 transplants were performed in 906 AA patients. Most received organs from cadaveric donors, while only 99 (10%) of AA patients received living donor transplants. The acceptance of living unrelated donors and the use of laparoscopic nephrectomy have had a negligible impact on living donations in this racial group. Primary disease had little effect on outcome except in diabetics whose mortality was higher. The one-year graft survival rates improved dramatically with the aggressive use of CsA without the use of antibody induction. The overall one- and 5-year graft survival rates improved from 53% and 32%, respectively, in the 1978-1983 era to 87% and 59%, respectively, in the 1993-2001 era. At MUSC, the emphasis has been on reducing mortality due to sepsis by limiting the number of rejections treated particularly in recipients of cadaveric organs. While this has resulted in reduced overall early mortality, it has not adversely affected graft survival. Our experience suggests that while short-term graft survival has improved significantly over the years for AA patients, the long-term outcome still remains relatively unchanged.
    Clinical transplants 02/2001;
  • Article: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: impact on an established renal transplant program.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current disparity of viable organs and patients in need of a transplant has been an impetus for innovative measures. Live donor renal transplantation offers significant advantages compared with cadaveric donor transplantation: increased graft and patient survival, diminution in incidence of delayed graft function, acute tubular necrosis (ATN), and reduction in waiting time. Notwithstanding these gains live donors continue to be underutilized and account for only approximately one quarter of all renal transplants performed in the United States. It has been felt that inherent disincentives to live donation have slowed its growth. These include degree and duration of postoperative pain and convalescence, child care concerns, cosmetic concerns, and time until return to full activities and employment. In an attempt to curtail the disincentives to live donation, laparoscopic live donation (laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; LDN) was developed. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of our first 25 laparoscopic nephrectomies (performed over a 10-month period from September 1998 through July 1999) with the previous 25 standard open donor nephrectomies (ODNs) completed over the past 3 years. We conducted a retrospective review of all donor nephrectomies and recipient pairs performed over the past 3 years. End points included sex, operative time, length of stay, immediate and long-term renal function, and willingness to donate. There were no differences in demographics of the ODN versus the LDN group. The average length of stay was 2.48+/-0.72 days for the LDN versus 4.08+/-0.28 days for the ODN. ODN and LDN have comparable short- and long-term function with no delayed graft function and no complications. Growth of living donor transplant has increased from 16 per cent of all kidney transplants performed in 1995 to 23 per cent in 1999. We conclude that LDN is a viable alternative to the standard donor operation. LDN has had a positive impact on the donor pool by minimizing disincentives to live donation. With the initiation of our laparoscopic program the number of LDNs has increased. Presently the live donor pool is the most viable alternative to significantly increase the number of kidneys for transplantation.
    The American surgeon 01/2001; 66(12):1132-5. · 1.28 Impact Factor
  • Article: Rapid method for the analysis of peripheral chimerism in suspected graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation.
    A B Hahn, P Baliga
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The effects of microchimerism and possible tolerance have been well studied in orthotopic liver transplantation. In some patients, greater levels of donor cells persist in the periphery. These cells were characterized and their effects on clinical outcome were studied. Peripheral blood was obtained from patients at various times posttransplantation. HLA class II typing was performed by the polymerase chain reaction-sequence-specific primer method on unfractionated blood and lymphocyte subpopulations. Relative levels of amplification of donor and recipient alleles were compared. All patients studied had a low degree of chimerism that was most apparent in the CD8(+)T/natural killer (NK) cell population. One patient with persistently high levels of donor alleles in his CD8(+)T/NK cell population was diagnosed with severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and died of opportunistic infections. Another patient with biopsy-proven GVHD was chimeric in several cell populations. On resolution of her symptoms, donor alleles were reduced to levels undetectable by this assay. These results suggest that persistently elevated levels of donor CD8(+)T/NK cells in the periphery may indicate GVHD in liver transplant recipients. This technique aids in rapid diagnosis, which facilitates appropriate treatment and thus may improve clinical outcome.
    Liver Transplantation 04/2000; 6(2):180-4. · 3.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Enhanced allograft survival via simultaneous blockade of transferrin receptor and interleukin-2 receptor.
    J E Woodward, A L Bayer, P Baliga
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transferrin receptor (TfR) expression follows the induction of interleukin 2 receptor (IL-2R) expression in a sequence that is necessary to initiate cell proliferation in quiescent T lymphocytes. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that simultaneous blockade of TfR and IL-2R would be more effective in prolonging allograft survival and suppressing T-cell responses to alloantigen than single receptor blockade by modifying T-cell effectors to alloantigen. Neonatal C57BL/6 hearts were transplanted to CBA/J recipients in a heterotopic, nonvascularized cardiac allograft model. Anti-TfR and/or anti-IL-2R or isotype-matched control monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were administered at 100 microg intravenously on days 0 and 1 of transplantation. Anti-TfR mAb (25.7+/-0.9 days) significantly (P<0.01) prolonged cardiac allograft survival compared with anti-IL-2R mAb (12.5+/-0.9 days) or the isotype control (15.7+/-1.2 days, P<0.01, Wilcoxon rank-sum). Anti-TfR plus anti-IL-2R mAbs significantly (P<0.01) prolonged cardiac allograft survival to 50.7+/-2.0 days compared with the isotype control or either agent alone. These agents in combination down-regulated the intragraft T helper (Th)-1 cytokines, IL-2, interferon-gamma, and IL-15, while up-regulating the Th2 cytokine, IL-4, and completely abrogating the antigen-presenting cell IL-12p40 mRNA expression. Anti-TfR and anti-IL-2R mAbs are potent immunosuppressants. Combined blockade of TfR and IL-2R at the time of antigen presentation seems to be the most effective by shifting the intragraft Th cytokine paradigm.
    Transplantation 11/1999; 68(9):1369-76. · 4.00 Impact Factor
  • Article: Differential effects of transferrin receptor blockade on the cellular mechanisms involved in graft rejection.
    A L Bayer, P Baliga, J E Woodward
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since transferrin receptor (TfR) appears on activated T cells following the interaction of the antigen-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) with the T cell receptor (TCR) and the appearance of interleukin (IL)-2R, we therefore hypothesize that in vivo blockade of TfR prolongs allograft survival by altering the cellular mechanisms involved in graft rejection. Previous results in our laboratory have demonstrated that anti-TfR monoclonal antibody (mAb) at 100 microg on days 0 and 1 of transplantation significantly prolonged allograft survival to 25.7 +/- 0.9 days in a murine heterotopic, nonvascularized cardiac allograft model. In the current studies, administration of anti-TfR mAb at the time of maximal TfR expression, on days 2 and 3 post-transplantation, failed to prolong allograft survival (13.0 +/- 0.0 days) compared to the isotype controls (10.5 +/- 0.5 and 10.7 +/- 0.4 days) (p < 0.01, Wilcoxon rank sum). A 4-day course of anti-TfR mAb significantly prolonged allograft survival compared to the isotype controls, but was no more effective than a 2-day course of the mAb. Anti-TfR mAb suppressed the mixed lymphocyte response to donor-specific and third-party alloantigen by 78.7% (p < 0.05) and 80.8% (p < 0.05), respectively, while stimulating the CTL response to donor-specific (16.3%, p < 0.05) and third party (49.3%, p < 0.01) alloantigen. Anti-TfR mAb suppressed IL-15 and increased IL-4 intragraft mRNA expression when compared to the isotype controls. Examination of cell surface receptors important during T cell activation revealed alterations in expression following anti-TfR mAb treatment. Anti-TfR mAb is an effective immunosuppressant prolonging allograft survival by altering cell-mediated immune responses and the intragraft cytokine micro-environment.
    Transplant Immunology 09/1999; 7(3):131-9. · 1.46 Impact Factor
  • Article: Impact of segmental grafts on pediatric liver transplantation--a review of the United Network for Organ Sharing Scientific Registry data (1990-1996).
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to assess the relative impact of segmental grafts from cadaveric and living donors on outcomes in 3,409 pediatric transplants (<18 years) between 1990 and 1996. Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Scientific registry data from 1990 to 1996 was performed. Liver grafts consisted of 2,636 whole grafts (WLG), 246 liver donor grafts (LDG), 89 split liver graft (SLG), and 438 reduced-size grafts (RSG). Although the number of pediatric transplants were unchanged between 1990 and 1996, segmental grafts made up an increasing proportion from 14.5% to 29.2%, and WLG decreased proportionately. The increase among segmental grafts occurred for LDG (threefold), followed by SLG (53%) and RSG (50%). One-year graft and patient survival rates for 3,409 transplants were 69.7% and 81.9%, respectively and were significantly higher (P<.001) in nonhospitalized patients than in hospitalized patients (79.8% and 91.3% v 61.0% and 73.7%). LDG graft survival (75.9%) was comparable with WLG(70.9%) but significantly better at 1 year than SLG (60.3%, P = .007) and RSG (61.1%, P = .001), even after excluding retransplants and ICU patients. Patient survival rates were not different statistically between groups. A separate analysis of outcomes in recipients less than 1 year of age suggested significantly better graft and patient survivals for LDG (83.3% and 89.4%) than for WLG (62.3% and 76.5%) and RSG (62.7% and 75%). Segmental liver grafts from cadaveric and living donors constitute an increasing proportion of pediatric transplants. Survival rates of cadaveric segmental graft are inferior to those of live donor segmental grafts even after adjustment for medical condition. Live donor grafts demonstrate consistently superior graft and patient outcomes in pediatric recipients less than 1 year of age, and should be promoted aggressively as a solution to the critical shortage of size matched grafts in small recipients.
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery 02/1999; 34(1):107-10; discussion 110-1. · 1.45 Impact Factor
  • Article: T-cell alterations in cardiac allograft recipients after B7 (CD80 and CD86) blockade.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: T-cell activation requires engagement of the T cell receptor with the antigen-MHC and simultaneous ligation of the coreceptor CD28. CD28 binds both the CD80 (B7-1) and CD86 (B7-2) ligands on antigen-presenting cells. The functional role of these costimulatory pathways in transplantation is not completely understood. We tested the hypothesis that in vivo blockade of the CD28 pathway via the anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) would prolong allograft survival. Neonatal C57BL/6J (H2b) hearts were transplanted to CBA/J (H2k) recipients in a heterotopic nonvascularized model, with anti-CD80 and/or anti-CD86 mAbs being administered intravenously at the time of allografting (day 0) and on the following day (day 1). Anti-CD80 mAb (29.8+/-1.5 days) and anti-CD86 mAb (30.8+/-0.5 days) alone significantly prolonged allograft survival compared with the isotype control (10.7+/-0.4 days, P < 0.01, Wilcoxon rank sum). The concurrent (days 0 and 1) and sequential administration of anti-CD86 mAb on days 0 and 1 plus anti-CD80 mAb on days 2 and 3 prolonged allograft survival to >80 days. Simultaneous administration of anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 mAbs significantly suppressed donor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses to alloantigen. Anti-CD86 mAb suppressed intragraft interleukin (IL)-4, IL-10, IL-12 p40, and IL-15 mRNA expression. Anti-CD80 and/or anti-CD86 mAbs are potent immunosuppressants in prolonging allograft survival. Combined blockade of the B7 (CD80 and CD86) ligands seems to be the most effective in prolonging allograft survival and suppressing donor-specific allogeneic cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses. In vivo blockade of CD86, in comparison to CD80, had the greatest immunosuppressive effect on day 7 intragraft cytokines, suggesting its role on early allogeneic immune responses.
    Transplantation 07/1998; 66(1):14-20. · 4.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Transferrin receptor in T cell activation and transplantation.
    A L Bayer, P Baliga, J E Woodward
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transferrin receptor (TfR) expression is up-regulated during T cell activation after the interaction of the T cell receptor with the antigen-major histocompatibility complex and the expression of interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor. We hypothesize that anti-TfR monoclonal antibody (mAb) will prolong allograft survival by altering T cell responses. In a murine heterotopic nonvascularized cardiac allograft model, CBA/J (H-2k) recipients were transplanted with neonatal C57BL/6 (H-2b) donor hearts. Anti-TfR or isotype-matched control mAbs (100 microg) were administered at the time of transplantation and on the following day. Splenocytes from naive CBA/J mice were stimulated in vitro with C57BL/6 alloantigen. Anti-TfR mAb was administered at 5 microg/mL during the initiation of culture. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) and mixed lymphocyte responses (MLR) were performed to assess T cell function. After 24 h in culture, cells were harvested, RNA isolated, and semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction performed. Anti-TfR mAb prolonged allograft survival to 25.7 +/- 0.9 days compared to the isotype control (10.7 +/- 0.4 days, P < 0.01, Wilcoxon rank sum). Anti-TfR mAb completely abrogated the CTL response and suppressed the MLR by 70-86% compared to the isotype controls. Anti-TfR mAb suppressed IL-2, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), IL-10, and IL-12 p40 mRNA expression, but had no effect on IL-4, IL-12 p35, and IL-15 mRNA expression. In conclusion, anti-TfR mAb prolongs allograft survival, suppresses T cell function, and alters IL-2, IL-10, IL-12 p40, and IFN-gamma mRNA expression. These data suggest that the down-regulation in IL-12 mRNA by anti-TfR mAb may prevent the development of T helper cells, thereby promoting graft survival and altering cell-mediated immune responses. The partial effect by anti-TfR mAb on cytokine mRNA expression may be due to other contributing factors such as costimulation.
    Journal of Leukocyte Biology 07/1998; 64(1):19-24. · 4.99 Impact Factor
  • Article: Anti-transferrin receptor monoclonal antibody: a novel immunosuppressant.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transferrin receptor is a widely distributed cell surface receptor present on most proliferating and highly specialized quiescent cells. Expression of transferrin receptor on the surface of immune cells is up-regulated during T-cell activation after the interaction of the antigen-MHC with the T cell receptor. The role of transferrin receptor in T-cell activation has not been well-established. Since transferrin receptor is physically associated with the CD3 zeta-chain, blockade of transferrin receptor has the potential to interfere with the T-cell signals important in transplant rejection. Anti-transferrin receptor monoclonal antibody (mAb) was administered in vivo and in vitro to determine whether this agent was effective in prolonging allograft survival and altering cell-mediated immunity. Using donor C57BL/6J (H2b) hearts transplanted to CBA/J (H2k) recipients, anti-transferrin receptor mAb at the time of transplantation prolonged cardiac allograft mean survival time to 25.7+/-0.9 days compared with untreated (13.3+/-0.6 days, P < 0.05) or isotype-matched (10.7+/-0.4 days, P < 0.05) controls. Anti-transferrin receptor mAb administered in vivo failed to suppress the subsequent allogeneic responses. However, when added to culture, anti-transferrin receptor mAb suppressed the allogeneic cytotoxic T lymphocyte response by 79-100% but not the mixed lymphocyte response. These studies are the first to suggest that transferrin receptor is a potential therapeutic target for clinical transplantation. Future studies will determine the most efficacious dose and time for maximal immunosuppression and the mechanisms responsible for the immunosuppression exhibited by antitransferrin receptor mAb.
    Transplantation 02/1998; 65(1):6-9. · 4.00 Impact Factor
  • Article: Blockade of multiple costimulatory receptors induces hyporesponsiveness: inhibition of CD2 plus CD28 pathways.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: T-lymphocyte activation requires engagement of the T cell receptor with antigen-major histocompatibility complex, and simultaneous ligation of costimulatory pathways via the lymphocyte receptors CD2 and CD28/ CTLA4. Anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) blocks the interaction of the antigen-presenting cell receptor CD48 with its ligand CD2, whereas CTLA4Ig binds with high affinity to the antigen-presenting cell ligands B7-1 and B7-2, blocking their interaction with CD28/CTLA4. We tested the immunosuppressive effects of simultaneously blocking both costimulatory pathways. Using donor C57BL/6J (H2b) hearts transplanted to CBA/J (H2k) recipients, anti-CD2 mAb plus CTLA4Ig administered at the time of transplantation prolonged cardiac allograft mean survival time to >120 days compared with untreated controls (12.2+/-0.5 days, P<0.01), anti-CD2 mAb alone (24.8+/-1.0 days, P<0.01), or CTLA4Ig alone (55.0+/-2.0 days, P<0.01). Retransplantation of these recipients with donor-specific and third-party grafts demonstrated that hyporesponsiveness and tolerance were achieved. In vitro stimulation of lymphocytes from tolerant recipients with donor-specific alloantigen resulted in normal cytotoxic T lymphocyte and mixed lymphocyte reaction responses, showing that clonal deletion or anergy did not occur, but that graft adaptation or suppression likely helped to maintain long-term graft survival. In vitro combinations of anti-CD2 mAb and CTLA4Ig suppressed the generation of allogeneic cytotoxic T lymphocytes (58%) and the mixed lymphocyte reaction (36%); CTLA4Ig was more effective in this regard and the two agents were not synergistic. Anti-CD2 mAb and CTLA4Ig suppressed mitogen-driven proliferation in differential fashions, suggesting that they affected independent signaling pathways. Anti-CD2 mAb and CTLA4Ig also inhibited interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, and IL-2 receptor (CD25). These data indicate that anti-CD2 mAb plus CTLA4Ig induces hyporesponsiveness and tolerance. The mechanism is likely related to the initial disruption of independent pathways of T-lymphocyte activation leading to antigen-specific long-term graft survival.
    Transplantation 11/1996; 62(7):1011-8. · 4.00 Impact Factor
  • Article: Intestinal transplantation: an early experience.
    Transplantation Proceedings 11/1996; 28(5):2734-5. · 1.00 Impact Factor
  • Article: Prostaglandin E1 administration following orthotopic liver transplantation: a randomized prospective multicenter trial.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) has been used after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) based on limited clinical data suggesting PGE1 infusion improves immediate hepatic allograft function. The aim of this study was to conduct a randomized double-blinded multicenter trial to evaluate the effect of PGE1 on early hepatic and renal function in patients undergoing OLT. One hundred eighteen patients were randomized to receive either PGE1 or crystalloid placebo intravenously after allograft revascularization. Primary end points were incidence of primary allograft nonfunction (PNF) or severe renal dysfunction. The incidence of PNF was 6.7% (4 of 60) and 6.9% (4 of 58) in the control and PGE1 groups, respectively. PGE1 infusion was, however, associated with improved early renal function (mean peak creatinine level of 1.4 +/- 1.0 and 2.0 +/- 1.0 in patients treated with PGE1 and placebo, respectively; P < 0.001). Severe renal dysfunction occurred more frequently in the placebo group (26.7%) than in the PGE1 group (13.8%; P = 0.65). Additionally, dialysis treatments were more frequent in the placebo group (0.7 +/- 2.0 per patient) than in the PGE1 group (0.2 +/- 1.0 per patient; P = 0.10). Initial intensive care unit stay was shorter in patients treated with PGE1 (4.0 +/- 3.6 days) compared with controls (10.5 +/- 17.1 days) (P < 0.01). PGE1 administration after OLT resulted in improved renal function and decreased initial postoperative intensive care unit stay but did not affect the incidence of PNF.
    Gastroenterology 09/1996; 111(3):710-5. · 11.68 Impact Factor
  • Article: The effects of prostaglandin E1 on hepatic allograft vascular inflow: a prospective randomized double-blind study.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Improved hepatic microcirculation is one of the postulated mechanisms by which prostaglandin E1 (PGE(1)) could improve liver function in the setting of fulminant hepatic failure or poor allograft function immediately post-transplant. The purpose of this study was to determine whether PGE(1) improves hepatic allograft arterial and portal vein inflow. Fifty patients receiving a primary liver transplant were entered into a prospective randomized double-blind study. Measurements of hepatic arterial and portal venous flow were taken immediately after revascularization and after steady state drug infusion. PGE(1) (or placebo) was infused peripherally at an increasing dose and titrated for blood pressure to a target dose of 1 microgram/kg/hr (80 microgram/hr maximum). Changes in hepatic arterial and portal vein flow, and time to reach maximum dose were compared using the student's t test. Of the 50 patients entered, 15 were excluded from analysis (10 because of inability to obtain flow measurements, 4 because they were pediatric recipients <2 yrs of age, and 1 patient who was placed on open PGE(1)). Thirty-five patients were available for final analysis (control, N = 14; PGE(1),N = 21). There were no statistical differences in the change in hepatic artery of portal vein flow between PGE(1)-treated and -untreated grafts. The time to reach maximum dose of PGE(1) was longer in the PGE(1) treatment group. Maximum dose was reached in 85.7 per cent of patients in both groups. There was an effect on blood pressure in the study group as demonstrated by a longer time to reach maximum dose. There was no effect on hepatic vascular in flow.
    The American surgeon 03/1996; 62(3):184-7. · 1.28 Impact Factor
  • Article: Failure of dialysis access: revise or replace?
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Providing adequate long-term dialysis access has become increasingly difficult. In order to evaluate the operative factors associated with early failure of dialysis access, 2337 operations performed in 1124 patients over an 8-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Evaluation of 1306 procedures that eventually failed and required operative revision or repair provided the basis for this study. Access failure occurred in 459 (41%) of the 1124 patients. An average of 2.8 episodes of failure (range 1-13) were observed among this group of patients, occurring after an average of 230 +/- 9 days (mean +/- ++standard error) postoperatively, with the longest interval to failure being 2529 days. The time-to-failure for revision of a preexistent arteriovenous fistula or prosthetic graft (140 +/- 9 days, n = 449) was significantly (P < 0.0001 ANOVA) shorter than for creation of an arteriovenous fistula (272 +/- 21 days, n = 336) or prosthetic graft (299 +/- 19 days, n = 372) at a new site. Procedures performed in octogenarians tended to fail earlier (178 days). Dialysis access failure tends to recur in patients with a history of previous access problems. The time-to-failure was similar for new prosthetic grafts and arteriovenous fistulas, but twice as long compared to revision of a previous access site.
    Journal of Surgical Research 02/1996; 60(2):312-6. · 2.25 Impact Factor
  • Article: Effectiveness of combination prophylaxis with cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin and acyclovir in the high-risk kidney transplant recipient.
    Transplantation Proceedings 11/1995; 27(5 Suppl 1):42-3. · 1.00 Impact Factor
  • Article: Avulsion of the right facial vein during double cannulation of the internal jugular vein.
    Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 09/1995; 9(4):429-30. · 1.64 Impact Factor