-
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 03/2013; · 6.38 Impact Factor
-
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 07/2012; 53(9):1490-4. · 6.38 Impact Factor
-
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 12/2011; 52(12):27N. · 6.38 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Nuclear medicine in the United States has grown because of advances in technology, including hybrid imaging, the introduction of new radiopharmaceuticals for diagnosis and therapy, and the development of molecular imaging based on the tracer principle, which is not based on radioisotopes. Continued growth of the field will require cost-effectiveness data and evidence that nuclear medicine procedures affect patients' outcomes. Nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists will need more training in anatomic and molecular imaging. New educational models are being developed to ensure that future physicians will be adequately prepared.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 12/2011; 52 Suppl 2:24S-8S. · 6.38 Impact Factor
-
Dominique Delbeke
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 06/2011; 52(6):24N-5N. · 6.38 Impact Factor
-
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 03/2011; 52(3):24N. · 6.38 Impact Factor
-
Dominique Delbeke
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 11/2010; 51(11):14N. · 6.38 Impact Factor
-
Dominique Delbeke
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 11/2010; 51(11):16N. · 6.38 Impact Factor
-
Dominique Delbeke
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 09/2010; 51(9):39N. · 6.38 Impact Factor
-
Dominique Delbeke
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 07/2010; 51(7):18N. · 6.38 Impact Factor