C Kammerlander

Landeskrankenhaus - Universitätskliniken Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria

Are you C Kammerlander?

Claim your profile

Publications (13)24.25 Total impact

  • Article: Surgeons save bones: an algorithm for orthopedic surgeons managing secondary fracture prevention.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Postmenopausal osteoporosis has a big impact on health care budget worldwide, which are expected to double by 2050. In spite of severe medical and socioeconomic consequences from fragility fractures, there are insufficient efforts in optimizing osteoporotic treatment and prevention. Undertreatment of osteoporosis is a well known phenomenon, particularly in elderly patients. Treatment rates remain low across virtually all patient, provider, and hospital-level characteristics, even after fragility fractures. In-hospital initiation is one of the options to increase treatment rates and improve osteoporosis management. However, multiple factors contribute to the failure of initiating appropriate treatment of osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures. These include a lack of knowledge in osteoporosis and an absence of a comprehensive treatment guideline among family physicians and orthopedic surgeons. Furthermore, orthopedic surgeons are hardly willing to accept their responsibility for osteoporosis treatment due to the fact that they are usually not familiar with the initiation of specific drug treatments. The presented algorithm offers trauma surgeons and orthopedic surgeons a safe and simple guided pathway of treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women appropriately after fragility fractures based on the current literature. From our point of view, this algorithm is useful for almost all cases and the user can expect treatment recommendations in more than 90 % of all cases. Nevertheless, some patients may require specialized review by an endocrinologist. The proposed algorithm may help to increase the rate of appropriate osteoporosis treatment hence reducing the rates of fragility fractures.
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 05/2013; · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • Article: Literature review of outcome parameters used in studies of geriatric fracture centers.
    I S L Liem, C Kammerlander, N Suhm, S L Kates, M Blauth
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: A variety of multidisciplinary treatment models have been described to improve outcome after osteoporotic hip fractures. There is a tendency toward better outcomes after implementation of the most sophisticated model with a shared leadership for orthopedic surgeons and geriatricians; the Geriatric Fracture Center. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the use of outcome parameters in published literature on the Geriatric Fracture Center evaluation studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed using Medline and the Cochrane Library to identify Geriatric Fracture Center evaluation studies. The outcome parameters used in the included studies were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 16 outcome parameters were used in 11 studies to evaluate patient outcome in 8 different Geriatric Fracture Centers. Two of these outcome parameters are patient-reported outcome measures and 14 outcome parameters were objective measures. CONCLUSION: In-hospital mortality, length of stay, time to surgery, place of residence and complication rate are the most frequently used outcome parameters. The patient-reported outcomes included activities of daily living and mobility scores. There is a need for generally agreed upon outcome measures to facilitate comparison of different care models.
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 08/2012; · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • Article: Osteoporosis and polypharmacy.
    M Gosch, M Jeske, C Kammerlander, T Roth
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Osteoporosis is very common in elderly patients. Despite the severe health-related consequences for individual patients and the socioeconomic costs caused by osteoporotic fractures, treatment rates are still low. Due to drug interactions and patient compliance, polypharmacy is often mentioned as a reason for undertreatment. Several drugs have a direct or indirect effect on bone metabolism. The present paper discusses the risk of interactions of anti-osteoporotic drugs (oral and parenteral bisphosphonates, raloxifene, strontium ranelate, teriparatide, and denosumab) with other common medications in elderly patients and their impact on bone metabolism and fracture risk. In summary, the number and risk of drug interactions of all common anti-osteoporotic drugs are small and clinically rather irrelevant. However, patients with a polypharmacy are at a higher risk of fractures and should receive osteoporosis treatment, if indicated.
    Zeitschrift für Gerontologie + Geriatrie 07/2012; 45(6):450-4. · 0.61 Impact Factor
  • Article: Is augmentation a possible salvage procedure after lateral migration of the proximal femur nail antirotation?
    S Erhart, C Kammerlander, R El-Attal, W Schmoelz
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Failed fracture fixation of proximal femur fractures in the elderly usually results in prosthetic replacement. In case of the proximal femur nail antirotation (PFNA), during lateral blade migration or periimplant fracture at the femoral shaft, the femoral head remains intact and therefore a joint preserving procedure might be performed. However, implant anchorage in the femoral head after the second blade implantation generally results in reduced anchorage in the remaining cancellous bone. Therefore, we hypothesize that in the above mentioned cases augmentation of the PFNA blade could be a treatment option before prosthetic surgery has to be performed. Biomechanical investigations were performed in eight fresh frozen femoral heads. Implant anchorage in case of blade extraction and reinsertion was investigated by rotation and pull out of a PFNA blade with a servohydraulic testing machine. After reinsertion of the blade and augmentation with bone-cement, the anchorage of the blade was investigated again to observe changes in torque and pull-out force. Rotational stability of the implant significantly increased after augmentation of the prior extracted PFNA blade. Pull-out strength was higher in the revised case than in the initial tests but without statistical significance. After augmentation, correlation between bone mineral density and pull-out strength which was found during initial pull-out disappeared. Augmentation of simulated blade exchange after lateral blade migration demonstrated a good anchorage. There was superior rotational stability in the revised case and no inferiority during pull out for the investigated specimens. Furthermore, augmentation could compensate for destroyed trabeculae and poor bone stock. It could furthermore be an option when a failed implant has to be replaced by a long PFNA in case of shaft fracture at the tip of the implant to increase anchorage in the femoral head. From a biomechanical point of view, reosteosynthesis and augmentation in selected cases of PFNA revision could be an alternative to initial prosthetic replacement. In the case of cut-out or medial implant protrusion, the suggested salvage technique is not feasible.
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 07/2012; 132(11):1577-81. · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • Article: [Osteoporotic treatment options in geriatric patients].
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Due to the demographic changes of the last few decades, there has been a significant increase in the number of osteoporotic fractures. After a fracture, geriatric patients are at particularly high risk for an increase of their functional impairments as well as a loss of independence and quality of life. In spite of the severe medical and socioeconomic consequences of fragility fractures, osteoporotic treatment and prevention are still insufficient. Based on the current literature, the pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment options as well as new surgical techniques for geriatric patients are reviewed.
    Zeitschrift für Gerontologie + Geriatrie 06/2012; 45(5):417-28; quiz 429. · 0.61 Impact Factor
  • Article: Functional outcome and mortality in geriatric distal femoral fractures.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fragility fractures are a major health care problem worldwide. Due to the ageing population an increase of distal femoral fractures is to be expected. We studied the long-term functional outcome and their influencing factors in geriatric patients with LISS-plated distal femoral fractures. A cohort study with functional long-term follow up examination was carried out in a level one trauma centre on distal femoral fracture patients 65 years and older. Of 53 consecutive patients who were treated in our hospital, 43 patients with a mean age of 80 years met our inclusion criteria. 48.8% died within the study period of 5.3 years. On the remaining patients the residential status, the Barthel index and the Parker score were assessed. The mean Barthel index was 47.7 and the mean Parker score was 3.5. 23% were found to be totally housebound and 26% were not able to perform any social activity. Only 18% were able to walk unaided. Patients with any medical complication had significantly higher mortality rates. Patients with extraarticular fractures had better mobility scores. Nursing home residents showed higher mortality rates but compared to patients coming from their own home the difference regarding Barthel and Parker scores remained non-significant. This study documents the poor functional long-term outcome of geriatric patients with distal femoral fractures. In comparison to other fragility fracture patients it seems that this population is at higher risk to die in-hospital during their perioperative course. Medical complications have to be avoided as they were found to be associated with worse functional outcome and higher mortality rates. An osteoporosis therapy may be associated with reduced mortality rates also in these patients.
    Injury 03/2012; 43(7):1096-101. · 1.98 Impact Factor
  • Article: The Epidemiology of Sports-Related Injuries in Older Adults: A Central European Epidemiologic Study.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: The population is rapidly aging and remaining more active over the age of 65. An increasing number of sports related injuries in individuals 65 and older are thus anticipated. The aim of this study is to analyze the epidemiology of sports injuries in the age group aged 65 and older. Methods: Data from the medical records of adults aged 65 years and older who were treated for sports-related injuries at a level one trauma center between December 1994 and February 2008 was collected and statistically analyzed. Results: A total of 2,635 patients met our inclusion criteria. There were 1,647 men (62.5%) and 988 women (37.5%) with a mean age of 70.9 years. The yearly number of injuries doubled during the study period (1996-2007). The most common mechanism of injury was a simple fall from standing height (69%). Nearly 75% of all injuries occurred during alpine skiing, cycling or mountain climbing. The median Injury Severity Score was 4. Minor injuries and wounds (40%) were recorded most commonly followed by fractures (27%), sprains, ligament injuries (19%) and injuries of muscles and tendons (6%). The most frequent diagnoses were minor injuries to the head and ligament injuries around the knee joint. Injuries to the upper extremities occurred in 33.7%, injuries to the lower extremities in 29.4% and injuries to the head occurred in 20% of the patients. Women sustained substantially more fractures than men. Conclusion: Adults aged 65 and older are remaining active in sports, which results in higher numbers of sports related injuries in this age group. Identification of type, mechanism and distribution of the injuries can help with the recognition of risk factors for injury. This may enable us to develop appropriate preventative measures to reduce the incidence, and morbidity of such injuries.
    Aging - Clinical and Experimental Research 02/2012;
  • Article: The Tyrolean Geriatric Fracture Center: an orthogeriatric co-management model.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aging population is growing rapidly and this change results in an increase in the number of fragility fracture patients. Several reports describe their poor outcome. Integrated models of care have been published in order to improve quality of patient care. We established an orthogeriatric model of care at the Department of Trauma Surgery in Innsbruck in cooperation with the Department of Geriatric Medicine (Hochzirl) and the Department for Anesthesiology. This report describes our concept as well as initial experience. We included all geriatric patients according to the definition of the German Geriatric Society. In all patients, basic demographic data, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and type of fracture were recorded. Main principles of the newly implemented system are the integration of a geriatrician in our team of trauma surgeons and anesthesiologists, prioritization of patients, development of our own clinical treatment guidelines, regular interdisciplinary and interprofessional meetings, a special outpatient clinic for these patients, and the better cooperation with the nearby Department of Geriatric Medicine. A total of 529 patients met our inclusion criteria during 2010; 77.4% were female and the mean age was 84.1 years. The overall medical complication rate was 20.4%. Of the patients, 36.1% had hip fractures and 70.5% could be operated mainly using spinal anesthesia within 24 h and their mean length of stay was significantly shorter than operations performed 5 years previously. At 3 months, 86.7% of the patients had returned home and, thus, had reached their prefracture residency. A coordinated, multidisciplinary model for the treatment of fragility fractures has the potential to improve the quality of patient care. Several international studies report superior outcome and our own findings are promising as well. We could show that our major goals, e.g., reduction of complications, shortening the length of stay, and restoration of the prefracture residency, can be improved by implementing such a model.
    Zeitschrift für Gerontologie + Geriatrie 12/2011; 44(6):363-7. · 0.61 Impact Factor
  • Article: Treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal hip fracture patients after geriatric rehabilitation: changes over the last decade.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Osteoporotic hip fractures are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in postmenopausal women, and their impacts on society are substantial. Although adequate osteoporotic treatment reduces the risk of subsequent fractures and also mortality, only a minor proportion of the patients receives sufficient therapy. The goal of the present study was to evaluate osteoporosis treatment in two different cohorts and to describe the changes after the implementation of a Geriatric Facture Center (GFC) in cooperation with a level 1 trauma center. A retrospective, single-center cross sectional study design was used. A total of 455 patients (70 years and older) were included at our department of geriatric medicine. The patients were split into two groups. The usual care (UC) group consisted of 327 patients admitted to our department from 2001-2004. The GFC group included 128 patients admitted from 2009-2010. In addition to recording osteoporosis therapy, we collected demographic data, comorbidities, and different functional parameters of the patients. The data were collected retrospectively using medical records. SPSS 18.0 was used for statistical analysis. Of the patients, 43% in the GFC group received a specific antiresorptive or anabolic treatment (SAAT). Basic treatment with calcium and vitamin D3 was prescribed in 88% of the patients. The diagnosis "osteoporosis" was found in 73.4% of the discharge letters. In the UC group, the percentage of patients with a SAAT was 14.7%, calcium and vitamin D3 was prescribed in 30%, and the diagnosis was documented in 24.5%. All these differences are statistically significant (p < 0.0001). In the GFC group, better functional status and cognition were significantly associated with a higher rate of a prescribed SAAT, whereas age and comorbidities showed a negative association. Our results show that the management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal hip fracture patients has significantly improved over the last decade. From our point of view, the main impact on this development is due to the implementation of a GFC with corresponding guidelines and treatment steps. In addition to structural changes, the improved evidence for osteoporosis treatment, especially of geriatric patients, has a positive influence on osteoporosis therapy.
    Zeitschrift für Gerontologie + Geriatrie 12/2011; 44(6):381-6. · 0.61 Impact Factor
  • Article: Standardised cement augmentation of the PFNA using a perforated blade: A new technique and preliminary clinical results. A prospective multicentre trial.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pertrochanteric fractures are a rising major health-care problem in the elderly and their operative stabilisation techniques are still under discussion. Furthermore, complications like cut-out are reported to be high and implant failure often is associated with poor bone quality. The PFNA(®) with perforated blade offers a possibility for standardised cement augmentation using a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement which is injected through the perforated blade to enlarge the load-bearing surface and to diminish the stresses on the trabecular bone. The current prospective multicentre study was undertaken to evaluate the technical performance and the early clinical results of this new device. In nine European clinics, 59 patients (45 female, mean age 84.5 years) suffering from an osteoporotic pertrochanteric fracture (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen, AO-31) were treated with the augmented PFNA(®). Primary objectives were assessment of operative and postoperative complications, whereas activities of daily living, pain, mobility and radiologic parameters, such as cement distribution around the blade and the cortical thickness index, were secondary objectives. The mean follow-up time was 4 months where we observed callus healing in all cases. The surgical complication rate was 3.4% with no complication related to the cement augmentation. More than one-half of the patients reached their prefracture mobility level within the study period. A mean volume of 4.2ml of cement was injected. We did not find any cut-out, cut through, unexpected blade migration, implant loosening or implant breakage within the study period. Our findings lead us to conclude that the standardised cement augmentation using the perforated blade for pertrochanteric fracture fixation enhances the implant anchorage within the head-neck fragment and leads to good functional results.
    Injury 08/2011; 42(12):1484-90. · 1.98 Impact Factor
  • Article: Neuroaxial versus general anaesthesia in geriatric patients for hip fracture surgery: does it matter?
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The influence of the mode of anaesthesia on outcome of geriatric patients with hip fractures is a controversial issue in the medical literature. In the light of an ageing society, a conclusive answer to this question is of growing importance. The purpose of this review was to assess the effect of neuroaxial and general anaesthesia on mortality and morbidity in geriatric patients sustaining a hip fracture. Following a current literature search within the Pubmed and Cochrane database (1967-2010), 34 randomised controlled trials, 14 observational studies and eight reviews/meta-analysis publications were included. Potentially outcome-influencing factors such as mortality, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, postoperative confusion and other anaesthesia-related outcomes were evaluated. After analysing the current literature with 56 references, covering 18,715 patients with hip fracture, it can be concluded that spinal anaesthesia is associated with significantly reduced early mortality, fewer incidents of deep vein thrombosis, less acute postoperative confusion, a tendency to fewer myocardial infarctions, fewer cases of pneumonia, fatal pulmonary embolism and postoperative hypoxia. General anaesthesia has the advantages of having a lower incidence of hypotension and a tendency towards fewer cerebrovascular accidents compared to neuroaxial anaesthesia. Otherwise, general anaesthesia and respiratory diseases were significant predictors of morbidity in hip fracture patients. These data suggest that regional anaesthesia is the preferred technique, but the limited evidence available does not permit a definitive conclusion to be drawn for mortality or other outcomes. For hip fracture surgery, the choice of anaesthesia (general or neuroaxial) is made by the anaesthesiologist and is based on the patient's preference, comorbidities, potential general postoperative complications and the clinical experience of the anaesthesiologist. The overall therapeutic approach in hip fracture care should be determined jointly by the orthopaedic surgeon, the geriatrician and the anaesthesiologist (multidisciplinary approach).
    Osteoporosis International 12/2010; 21(Suppl 4):S555-72. · 4.58 Impact Factor
  • Article: Outcome in geriatric fracture patients and how it can be improved.
    T Roth, C Kammerlander, M Gosch, T J Luger, M Blauth
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Geriatric fractures are an increasing medical problem worldwide. This article wants to give an overview on the literature concerning the outcome to be expected in geriatric fracture patients and what can be done to improve it. In literature, excess mortality rates vary from 12% to 35% in the first year after a hip fracture, and also, other geriatric fractures seem to reduce the patient's remaining lifetime. Geriatric fractures and, in particular, hip fractures constitute a major source of disability and diminished quality of life in the elderly. Age, gender, comorbid conditions, prefracture functional abilities, and fracture type have an impact on the outcome regarding ambulation, activities of daily living, and quality of life. Comprehensive orthogeriatric comanagement might improve the outcome of geriatric fracture patients. For the future, well designed, large prospective randomized controlled trials with clear outcome variables are needed to finally prove the effectiveness of existing concepts.
    Osteoporosis International 12/2010; 21(Suppl 4):S615-9. · 4.58 Impact Factor
  • Article: Ortho-geriatric service--a literature review comparing different models.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the fast-growing geriatric population, we are confronted with both osteoporosis, which makes fixation of fractures more and more challenging, and several comorbidities, which are most likely to cause postoperative complications. Several models of shared care for these patients are described, and the goal of our systematic literature research was to point out the differences of the individual models. A systematic electronic database search was performed, identifying articles that evaluate in a multidisciplinary approach the elderly hip fracture patients, including at least a geriatrician and an orthopedic surgeon focused on in-hospital treatment. The different investigations were categorized into four groups defined by the type of intervention. The main outcome parameters were pooled across the studies and weighted by sample size. Out of 656 potentially relevant citations, 21 could be extracted and categorized into four groups. Regarding the main outcome parameters, the group with integrated care could show the lowest in-hospital mortality rate (1.14%), the lowest length of stay (7.39 days), and the lowest mean time to surgery (1.43 days). No clear statement could be found for the medical complication rates and the activities of daily living due to their inhomogeneity when comparing the models. The review of these investigations cannot tell us the best model, but there is a trend toward more recent models using an integrated approach. Integrated care summarizes all the positive features reported in the various investigations like integration of a Geriatrician in the trauma unit, having a multidisciplinary team, prioritizing the geriatric fracture patients, and developing guidelines for the patients' treatment. Each hospital implementing a special model for geriatric hip fracture patients should collect detailed data about the patients, process of care, and outcomes to be able to participate in audit processes and avoid peerlessness.
    Osteoporosis International 12/2010; 21(Suppl 4):S637-46. · 4.58 Impact Factor