Publications (8)14.42 Total impact
-
Article: Protecting adolescents' right to seek treatment for sexually transmitted diseases without parental consent: the Arizona experience with Senate Bill 1309.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In 2010, Senate Bill 1309 included language to repeal an existing Arizona law that enables minors younger than 18 years of age to seek diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) without parental consent. Numerous implications were identified that would have stemmed from parental consent provisions originally proffered in Senate Bill 1309. These implications included diminished access to essential health services among minors, exacerbated existing health disparities, increased health-care spending costs, and thwarted efforts to curb the spread of STDs. Lastly, minors would have been deprived of existing privacy protections concerning their STD-related medical information. This case study describes how collaborative advocacy efforts resulted in the successful amendment of Senate Bill 1309 to avert the negative sexual and reproductive health outcomes among adolescents stemming from the potential repeal of their existing legal right to seek STD treatment without parental consent.Public Health Reports 05/2012; 127(3):253-8. · 1.27 Impact Factor -
Article: Needle in a haystack: the yield of syphilis outreach screening at 5 US sites-2000 to 2007.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Screening for syphilis has been performed for decades, but it is unclear if the practice yields many cases at acceptable cost, and if so, at which venues. We attempted a retrospective study to determine the costs, yield, and feasibility of analyzing health department-funded syphilis outreach screening in 5 diverse US sites with significant disease burdens. Data (venue, costs, number of tests, reactive tests, new diagnoses) from 2000 to 2007 were collected for screening efforts funded by public health departments from Philadelphia; New York City; Washington, District of Columbia; Maricopa County, Arizona (Phoenix); and the state of Florida. Crude cost per new case was calculated. Screening was conducted in multiple venues including jails, shelters, clubs, bars, and mobile vans. Over the study period, approximately 926 258 tests were performed and 4671 new syphilis cases were confirmed, of which 225 were primary and secondary, and 688 were early latent or high-titer late latent. Jail intake screening consistently identified the largest numbers of new cases (including 67.6% of early and high-titer late-latent cases) at a cost per case ranging from $144 to $3454. Data quality from other venues varied greatly between sites and was often poor. Though the yield of jail intake screening was good, poor data quality, particularly cost data, precluded accurate cost/yield comparisons at other venues. Few cases of infectious syphilis were identified through outreach screening at any venue. Health departments should routinely collect all cost and testing data for screening efforts so that their yield can be evaluated.Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP 11/2011; 17(6):513-21. · 0.96 Impact Factor -
Article: Assessing compliance with a county board order for third trimester syphilis screening in Maricopa County, Arizona.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Due to high rates of congenital syphilis, a Maricopa County board order was issued in 2003 to increase prenatal syphilis screening. The provisions of this order included prenatal syphilis screening during the first prenatal visit, to be repeated during the third trimester, and again at delivery. The purpose of the study was to evaluate syphilis screening practices and barriers to screening among obstetric providers. Maricopa County medical providers who delivered at least 21 infants (97.2% of all deliveries) in 2008 according to live birth records were surveyed by telephone. A total of 146 surveys were completed representing 76% (319/421) of the delivering providers and 83% of delivered infants for 2008. All of the represented prenatal care providers reported testing their patients for syphilis at the first trimester, and 284 (89%) reported screening again during the third trimester. All of the surveyed providers reported screening at least once for syphilis during pregnancy and most reported re-screening during the third trimester as recommended by the Maricopa County board order. Similar public health screening guidance should be considered in areas where congenital syphilis rates are high and/or where syphilis is prevalent among women of childbearing age. A local health order of this type is a simple intervention that can provide practice guidance on emerging health issues.Sexual & reproductive healthcare: official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives 08/2011; 2(3):125-8. -
Article: Epidemiology of syphilis among Hispanic women and associations with congenital syphilis, Maricopa county, Arizona.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We investigated factors associated with high rates of congenital syphilis among Hispanic infants in Maricopa County, AZ. Using 2004-2008 syphilis case report data from the state and county health departments, we examined characteristics of pregnant and nonpregnant women with syphilis and their male partners. During 2004-2008, 970 women were reported to have syphilis: 49% were Hispanic (of whom 49% were non-US citizens), 27% were white, 13% were black, and 8% were American Indian/Alaskan Native. Although 16% of Hispanic noncitizens reported drug use or high-risk sexual behaviors, 64% of these women had a male sex partner who reported drug use or anonymous sex. Hispanic women with syphilis were more likely to be pregnant (37%) than white (15%) or black women (13%) (P < 0.05), and were overrepresented among pregnant women with syphilis. Pregnant Hispanic noncitizens were treated later than pregnant Hispanic citizens (median 28 weeks gestation vs. 21 weeks, P = 0.01). Innovative congenital syphilis prevention strategies that are relevant to Hispanic women are warranted. Strategies should address the reproductive health and prenatal care needs of Hispanic women, and may include interventions for their male partners.Sexually transmitted diseases 07/2011; 38(7):598-602. · 2.58 Impact Factor -
Article: Improving partner services by embedding disease intervention specialists in HIV-clinics.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Notifying partners of HIV-infected persons and referring them for testing and treatment is an effective method of disease control and identification of undiagnosed STD and/or HIV. To improve partner elicitation interviews, disease intervention specialists (DIS) were placed in 3 HIV clinics during 2008 and 2009. We reviewed the Arizona state STD surveillance database for 2007 to identify the providers (outside of the public STD clinics) reporting the highest number of syphilis cases. DIS were placed in the clinics for half a day per week (2 clinics) or on an on-call basis (1 clinic) to deliver penicillin and interview patients. We calculated changes in the number of patients interviewed, days elapsed from specimen collection to treatment (time to treatment), days elapsed from specimen collection to initial DIS contact (time to interview), and number of reported and locatable partners from these 3 clinics before and after the clinic placement of DIS. Before the placement of clinic-based DIS, 219 syphilis cases were diagnosed at the 3 clinics (January 2006 through January 2008). After DIS placement, 115 syphilis cases were diagnosed (February 2008 through September 2009) for a total of 334 cases in this analysis. A greater percent of patients completed a partner elicitation interview during the period of DIS placement (94% after vs. 81% before, P = 0.001). There were increases in the average number of locatable partners (1.1 after vs. 0.6 before, P = 0.004) and an increase in the average number of partners exposed and brought to treatment (CDC Disposition A) or infected and brought to treatment (CDC Disposition C) (0.6 after vs. 0.3 before, P = 0.02), and the time to interview decreased (18 days before vs. 9 days after, P = 0.02). Placing DIS within community HIV clinics improved partner services. STD and/or HIV programs should consider this method to improve partner notification.Sexually transmitted diseases 12/2010; 37(12):767-70. · 2.58 Impact Factor -
Article: Opportunities for the prevention of congenital syphilis in Maricopa County, Arizona.
Sex Transm Dis 05/2008; 35(4):341-3. · 2.87 Impact Factor -
Article: Use of directly observed azithromycin treatment for syphilis in a homeless woman.
Sex Transm Dis 07/2002; 29(6):372. · 2.87 Impact Factor -
Article: Integrating routine HIV testing into a public health STD clinic.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To integrate routine HIV testing into the services offered at a public health department STD clinic and document the rate of acceptance and rate of test positivity during the first 18 months. Testing for HIV was added to the array of tests offered to all patients at the Maricopa County STD clinic. Patients were informed of this new option at registration and were provided with a consent form and instructions to read the form and sign it, unless they did not desire testing. STD clinicians were responsible for insuring that questions regarding testing were answered and that consent forms were signed. HIV prevention was integrated into the general STD preventive messages during the clinical encounter. Sixty-eight percent of patients accepted testing (12,176 of 17,875). Of these, 68 were HIV-positive, for a rate of 5.6 per 1,000. The positive rate for men was 8.6/1000 and for women 1.2/1,000. The rate for men who reported having sex with men (MSM) was 63.8/1,000. Fourteen of the HIV-positive MSM were co-infected with syphilis. Of the 68 who were HIV-positive, 58 (85.3%) were successfully located, informed of their test results, and referred for HIV treatment and support services. HIV testing can be included in the routine battery of tests offered at an STD clinic with high patient acceptance. Routine testing can discover those who are unaware of their HIV-positive status, providing an opportunity for early referral for treatment, counseling to avoid disease transmission, and notification of sexual contacts.Public Health Reports 121(2):175-80. · 1.27 Impact Factor
Top co-authors
Top Journals
Institutions
-
2010–2012
-
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Atlanta, MI, USA
-
