Publications (5)16.38 Total impact
-
Article: The effect of obesity on regadenoson-induced myocardial hyperemia: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The A2(A) receptor agonist, regadenoson, is increasingly used as a vasodilator during nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. Regadenoson is administered as a single, fixed dose. Given the frequency of obesity in patients with symptoms of heart disease, it is important to know whether the fixed dose of regadenoson produces maximal coronary hyperemia in subjects of widely varying body size. Thirty subjects (12 female, 18 male, mean BMI 30.3 ± 6.5, range 19.6-46.6) were imaged on a 3T magnetic resonance scanner. Imaging with a saturation recovery radial turboFLASH sequence was done first at rest, then during adenosine infusion (140 μg/kg/min) and 30 min later with regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml bolus). A 5 cc/s injection of Gd-BOPTA was used for each perfusion sequence, with doses of 0.02, 0.03 and 0.03 mmol/kg, respectively. Analysis of the upslope of myocardial time-intensity curves and quantitative processing to obtain myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) values were performed for each vasodilator. The tissue upslopes for adenosine and regadenoson matched closely (y = 1.1x + 0.03, r = 0.9). Mean MPR was 2.3 ± 0.6 for adenosine and 2.4 ± 0.9 for regadenoson (p = 0.14). There was good agreement between MPR measured with adenosine and regadenoson (y = 1.1x - 0.06, r = 0.7). The MPR values measured with both agents tended to be lower as BMI increased. There were no complications during administration of either agent. Regadenoson produced fewer side effects. Fixed dose regadenoson and weight adjusted adenosine produce similar measures of MPR in patients with a wide range of body sizes. Regadenoson is a potentially useful vasodilator for stress MRI studies.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 10/2011; 28(6):1435-44. · 2.15 Impact Factor -
Article: High prevalence of right ventricular dysfunction in ICD patients with shocks: a potential new predictor in risk stratification.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Despite identifying several risk factors for sudden cardiac death, our ability to predict arrhythmic events in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) remains poor. The purpose of this study was to determine if patients who received appropriate ICD shocks had a higher degree of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction at baseline when compared to patients who did not receive ICD shocks. We conducted a 1:2 case-control, retrospective study comparing RV end-diastolic and end-systolic areas (RV ED and RV ES areas, respectively), fractional RV area change, and RV wall thickness in 19 consecutive patients who received appropriate ICD shocks (shock group) with another group of 38 patients who did not receive ICD shocks (no-shock group). There was no significant difference in the RV end-diastolic areas between the groups. However, patients who experienced ICD shocks had a higher RV end-systolic area and a lower RV fractional area change when compared to patients without ICD shocks, 16.3 ± 4.9 cm(2) and 27.7 ± 9.0% in the shock group versus 14.2 ± 4.4 cm(2) and 35.8 ± 10.3% in the no-shock group; (p = 0.08 and 0.004, respectively). Furthermore, the RV wall thickness was greater in patients with ICD shocks when compared to patients without ICD shocks, 0.49 ± 0.05 cm and 0.44 ± 0.04 cm, respectively (p = 0.001). Utilizing a logistic regression analysis and after controlling for variables with univariate significance (p < 0.1), RV wall thickness independently predicted ICD shocks (OR 13.9 mm(-1) change of RV thickness, p = 0.004). Our findings suggest that some measurements of RV function might prove to be useful in predicting future arrhythmic events. Additional prospective studies are needed to test this hypothesis.Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 02/2011; 31(2):165-9. · 1.17 Impact Factor -
Article: Atrial fibrosis helps select the appropriate patient and strategy in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a DE-MRI guided approach.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: MRI for AF Patient Selection and Ablation Approach. Introduction: Left atrial (LA) fibrosis and ablation related scarring are major predictors of success in rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF). We used delayed enhancement MRI (DE-MRI) to stratify AF patients based on pre-ablation fibrosis and also to evaluate ablation-induced scarring in order to identify predictors of a successful ablation. Methods and Results: One hundred and forty-four patients were staged by percent of fibrosis quantified with DE-MRI, relative to the LA wall volume: minimal or Utah stage 1; <5%, mild or Utah stage 2; 5-20%, moderate or Utah stage 3; 20-35%, and extensive or Utah stage 4; >35%. All patients underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation and posterior wall and septal debulking. Overall, LA scarring was quantified and PV antra were evaluated for circumferential scarring 3 months post ablation. LA scarring post ablation was comparable across the 4 stages. Most patients had either no (36.8%) or 1 PV (32.6%) antrum circumferentially scarred. Forty-two patients (29%) had recurrent AF over 283 ± 167 days. No recurrences were noted in Utah stage 1. Recurrence was 28% in Utah stage 2, 35% in Utah stage 3, and 56% in Utah stage 4. Recurrence was predicted by circumferential PV scarring in Utah stage 2 and by overall LA wall scarring in Utah stage 3. No recurrence predictors were identified in Utah stage 4. Conclusions: Circumferential PV antral scarring predicts ablation success in mild LA fibrosis, while posterior wall and septal scarring is needed for moderate fibrosis. This may help select the proper candidate and strategy in catheter ablation of AF.Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 01/2011; 22(1):16-22. · 3.06 Impact Factor -
Article: Evaluation of left atrial lesions after initial and repeat atrial fibrillation ablation: lessons learned from delayed-enhancement MRI in repeat ablation procedures.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We evaluated scar lesions after initial and repeat catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and correlated these regions to low-voltage tissue on repeat electroanatomic mapping. We also identified gaps in lesion sets that could be targeted and closed during repeat procedures. One hundred forty-four patients underwent AF ablation and received a delayed-enhancement MRI at 3 months after ablation. The number of pulmonary veins (PV) with circumferential lesions were assessed and correlated with procedural outcome. Eighteen patients with AF recurrence underwent repeat ablation. MRI scar regions were compared with electroanatomic maps during the repeat procedure. Regions of incomplete scar around the PVs were then identified and targeted during repeat ablation to ensure complete circumferential lesions. After the initial procedure, complete circumferential scarring of all 4 PV antrum (PVA) was achieved in only 7% of patients, with the majority of patients (69%) having <2 completely scarred PVA. After the first procedure, the number of PVs with complete circumferential scarring and total left atrial wall (LA) scar burden was associated with better clinical outcome. Patients with successful AF termination had higher average total left atrial wall scar of 16.4%+/-9.8 (P=0.004) and percent PVA scar of 66.2+/-25.4 (P=0.01) compared with patients with AF recurrence who had an average total LA wall scar 11.3%+/-8.1 and PVA percent scar 50.0+/-24.7. In patients who underwent repeat ablation, the PVA scar percentage was 56.1%+/-21.4 after the first procedure compared with 77.2%+/-19.5 after the second procedure. The average total LA scar after the first ablation was 11.0%+/-4.1, whereas the average total LA scar after second ablation was 21.2%+/-7.4. All patients had an increased number of completely scarred pulmonary vein antra after the second procedure. MRI scar after the first procedure and low-voltage regions on electroanatomic mapping obtained during repeat ablation demonstrated a positive quantitative correlation of R(2)=0.57. Complete circumferential PV scarring difficult to achieve but is associated with better clinical outcome. Delayed-enhancement MRI can accurately define scar lesions after AF ablation and can be used to target breaks in lesion sets during repeat ablation.Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 03/2010; 3(3):249-59. · 6.46 Impact Factor -
Article: Right ventricular dysfunction predicts poor outcome following hemodynamically compromising rejection.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Hemodynamically compromising rejection (HCR) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity after heart transplantation. Right ventricular (RV) function is a strong predictor of outcome in patients with heart failure and myocarditis. The objective of the current study is to determine whether RV dysfunction predicts event-free survival in patients with HCR. Medical records of 548 heart transplant patients followed at Stanford University between January 1998 and January 2007 were reviewed. HCR was defined as a rejection episode requiring hospitalization for heart failure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for death or retransplantation at 1 year. HCR occurred in 71 patients (12.9%). Death or retransplantation at 1 year occurred in 28 patients (39%). Univariate analysis identified non-cellular rejection (odds ratio [OR] = 3.20, p = 0.021), the need for inotropic support (OR = 4.80, p = 0.007), RV dysfunction (OR = 4.63, p = 0.006), left ventricular ejection fraction (OR = 0.941, p = 0.031) and acute renal failure (OR = 3.82, p = 0.010) as predictors of death or retransplantation at 1 year. Multivariate analysis identified RV dysfunction (OR = 4.80, p = 0.007) and the need for inotropic support (OR = 5.00, p = 0.009) as predictors of death or retransplantation at 1 year. In the modern era of immunosuppression, HCR remains a major complication after heart transplantation. RV dysfunction was identified as a novel risk factor for death or retransplantation following HCR.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation: the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation 05/2009; 28(4):312-9. · 3.54 Impact Factor
