S Peters

Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Are you S Peters?

Claim your profile

Publications (3)4.12 Total impact

  • Source
    Article: Borreliacidal activity of early Lyme disease sera against complement-resistant Borrelia afzelii FEM1 wild-type and an OspC-lacking FEM1 variant.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sera obtained from 14 Lyme borreliosis patients at early stages (stages I and II) of the disease were examined for their borreliacidal properties against Borrelia afzelii isolate FEM1 by use of a growth inhibition assay. Five of 14 immune sera exhibited borreliacidal activity against isolate FEM1. Heat-inactivated immune sera failed to kill the spirochaetes. Immunoblotting experiments with outer-membrane preparations showed that OspC and 11 additional proteins of 14.0, 16.0, 17.7, 19.3, 21.7, 27.5, 32.7, 40.7, 48.9, 51.3 and 53.6 kDa were recognised by borreliacidal immune sera. To analyse the borreliacidal properties of anti-OspC antibodies, two sera (EM4 and EM5), which beside antibodies against a 51.3-kDa protein contained exclusively anti-OspC antibodies, were further investigated by comparative analysis with a FEM1 wild-type and a FEM1 variant lacking OspC in a growth inhibition assay. Only FEM1 wild-type and not variant FEM1OspC(-) was killed by immune sera EM4 and EM5. Complement-dependent killing of FEM1 wild-type was mediated by formation of the terminal complement complex that was found to be attached directly to the outer membrane as confirmed by immuno-electron microscopy. No complement deposition was observed on the surface of variant FEM1OspC(-) after incubation with immune sera EM4 and EM5, thereby suggesting that only anti-OspC antibodies in these two immune sera were responsible for borreliacidal activity. These results provide direct evidence that anti-OspC antibodies, once developed during the immune response, are of critical importance for efficient killing of borreliae in the early phase of infection.
    Journal of Medical Microbiology 11/2000; 49(10):917-28. · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • Article: Growth inhibitory and bactericidal efficacy of sera from Lyme borreliosis patients on B. burgdorferi strains.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two B. afzelii strains EB1 and FEM1, classified in normal human sera (NHS) as serum-resistant, and an intermediate serum-sensitive B. burgdorferi s.s. strain 297, were tested in regard of their serum sensitivity in immune sera (IS) of patients at all stages of Lyme borreliosis by a growth inhibition assay (GIA). Fifty-four per cent (13/24) of the tested IS were GIA positive, while the sera of patients in stage III disease inhibited the growth more frequently than did the patients with sera of stage II or stage I disease. Growth inhibition was predominantly directed against strain FEM1 (12/24), less against strain EB1 (4/24) and strain 297 (2/24). A growth inhibiting effect on two strains was only detectable for two IS and merely one stage III serum inhibited all three strains. Positive results in the GIA required fresh serum and resulted in the killing of the borreliae. The detection of the deposited complement components C3 and C9 on the surfaces of the inhibited strains by means of immunofluorescence assays confirmed the role of complement. In Westernblot analyses of strain FEM1, it was striking that GIA-positive IS reacted 3- to 5-fold more often with proteins of molecular masses of 48.9-, 38.6-, 27.5-, 25-, 23.1- (OspC), 21.7-, and 16-kDa, than did GIA-negative IS. Furthermore, two proteins of approximately 20- and 31.2-kDa reacted exclusively with GIA-positive IS. Antibodies reacting with these proteins could play a role in the growth inhibition of NHS-resistant borrelial strains, OspC.
    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 01/1999; 110(24):886-93. · 0.81 Impact Factor
  • Article: Serologic evidence for tick-borne pathogens other than Borrelia burgdorferi (TOBB) in Lyme borreliosis patients from midwestern Germany.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The seroprevalence of antibodies against the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent (HGE) and Babesia microti was retrospectively determined in 76 Lyme borreliosis patients and in 44 asymptomatic individuals with a positive borreliosis serology, in comparison to 100 healthy blood donors from the Rhein-Main area. Additionally, seroreactivity for tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) was investigated. For antibody detection, commercially available immunofluorescence assays (MRL Diagnostics, USA) and a TBEV-ELISA (Immuno, Germany) were used. In the control group, the positivity rate for anti-Borrelia burgdorferi (IgG/IgM) and anti-Babesia microti-antibodies in the population of the Rhein-Main area (Midwestern Germany) may be estimated at 15% and 8%, respectively. Examination for both HGE and TBEV demonstrated seroreactivity (IgG) in 1% of tested individuals. Specific anti-HGE IgG and/or IgM antibodies were more often discovered in cases of early Borrelia infection (stage I: 13.6%, stage II: 18.4%) than in patients with stage III disease (0%) or in seropositive but asymptomatic patients (6.8%). Investigation for TBEV revealed seroreactivity for IgG in 13% of these cases. No TBEV-IgM was found. Interestingly, the prevalence of anti-HGE and anti-TBEV antibodies among Lyme borreliosis patients and seropositive patients without active Lyme disease symptoms was significantly higher than that in the control group of healthy blood donors (p < 0.05). Likewise, antibody titers reflecting a recent infection with Babesia microti could be demonstrated more often in patients with Lyme borreliosis stage I or II (p < 0.05). Analysis of 50 samples from patients with florid or recent syphilis infection revealed no crossreactivity between Babesia microti, HGE and Treponema pallidum. Our findings suggest that concomitant or serial infection due to TOBB may be common in tick exposed patients from the Rhein-Main area and in European countries in general. Hence, in addition to TBEV, human babesiosis and HGE should always be considered by European physicians in the differential diagnosis of acute febrile illness following a tick bite.
    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 12/1998; 110(24):901-8. · 0.81 Impact Factor