-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The gastrointestinal tract is the largest mucosal surface in our body. It houses diverse microorganisms that collectively form the commensal microbial community. The security of this community is kept by host-microbial interactions and is violated by foreign pathogens that induce local as well as systemic pathology. In most cases, gastrointestinal infections are caused by Gram-negative enteropathogens, which trigger host immune responses through the TLR4 signaling pathways. Although TRIF is one of the major pathways downstream of TLR4, very little is known about how the TRIF pathway contributes to intestinal defense against pathogenic infection. Recently, we reported a unique role of TRIF signaling in host response to an enterophathogen Yersinia enterocolitica, which consisted of IFN-β induction from regional macrophages followed by activation of NK cells in the mesenteric lymph nodes. In this addendum, we show distinct roles for TRIF-dependent host response in intestinal vs. systemic infection with Gram-negative enterophathogens.
Gut Microbes 09/2012; 3(5):437-41.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Eradication of infectious disease is our global health challenge. After encountering intestinal infection with a bacterial pathogen, the host defense program is initiated by local antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that eliminate invading pathogens by phagocytosis and establish localized inflammation by secreting cytokines and chemokines. These pathogen-experienced APCs migrate to the mesenteric lymph nodes, where host immune responses are precisely orchestrated. Initiation and regulation of this defense program appear to be largely dependent on innate immunity which is antigen non-specific and provides a rapid defense against broader targets. On the other hand, many bacterial enteropathogens have evoked abilities to modify the host defense program to their advantage. Therefore, better understanding of the host-pathogen interactions is essential to establish effective eradication strategies for enteric infectious diseases. In this review, we will discuss the current understanding of innate immune regulation of the host defense mechanisms against intestinal infection by bacterial pathogens.
Current Infectious Disease Reports 12/2011; 14(1):15-23.
-
John Sotolongo,
Cecilia España,
Andrea Echeverry,
David Siefker,
Norman Altman,
Julia Zaias,
Rebeca Santaolalla,
Jose Ruiz,
Kurt Schesser,
Becky Adkins,
Masayuki Fukata
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), which signals through the adapter molecules myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) and toll/interleukin 1 receptor domain-containing adapter inducing IFN-β (TRIF), is required for protection against Gram-negative bacteria. TRIF is known to be important in TLR3-mediated antiviral signaling, but the role of TRIF signaling against Gram-negative enteropathogens is currently unknown. We show that TRIF signaling is indispensable for establishing innate protective immunity against Gram-negative Yersinia enterocolitica. Infection of wild-type mice rapidly induced both IFN-β and IFN-γ in the mesenteric lymph nodes. In contrast, TRIF-deficient mice were defective in these IFN responses and showed impaired phagocytosis in regional macrophages, resulting in greater bacterial dissemination and mortality. TRIF signaling may be universally important for protection against Gram-negative pathogens, as TRIF-deficient macrophages were also impaired in killing both Salmonella and Escherichia coli in vitro. The mechanism of TRIF-mediated protective immunity appears to be orchestrated by macrophage-induced IFN-β and NK cell production of IFN-γ. Sequential induction of IFN-β and IFN-γ leads to amplification of macrophage bactericidal activity sufficient to eliminate the invading pathogens at the intestinal interface. Our results demonstrate a previously unknown role of TRIF in host resistance to Gram-negative enteropathogens, which may lead to effective strategies for combating enteric infections.
Journal of Experimental Medicine 11/2011; 208(13):2705-16. · 13.85 Impact Factor
-
Masayuki Fukata,
Limin Shang,
Rebeca Santaolalla, John Sotolongo,
Cristhine Pastorini,
Cecilia España,
Ryan Ungaro,
Noam Harpaz,
Harry S Cooper,
Greg Elson,
Marie Kosco-Vilbois,
Julia Zaias,
Maria T Perez,
Lloyd Mayer,
Arunan S Vamadevan,
Sergio A Lira,
Maria T Abreu
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Chronic intestinal inflammation culminates in cancer and a link to Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) has been suggested by our observation that TLR4 deficiency prevents colitis-associated neoplasia. In the current study we address the effect of the aberrant activation of epithelial TLR4 on induction of colitis and colitis-associated tumor development. We take a translational approach to address the consequences of increased TLR signaling in the intestinal mucosa.
Mice transgenic for a constitutively active TLR4 under the intestine-specific villin promoter (villin-TLR4 mice) were treated with dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) for acute colitis and azoxymethane (AOM)-DSS TLR4 expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in colonic tissue from patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and UC-associated cancer. The effect of an antagonist TLR4 antibody (Ab) was tested in prevention of colitis-associated neoplasia in the AOM-DSS model.
Villin-TLR4 mice were highly susceptible to both acute colitis and colitis-associated neoplasia. Villin-TLR4 mice had increased epithelial expression of COX-2 and mucosal PGE₂ production at baseline. Increased severity of colitis in villin-TLR4 mice was characterized by enhanced expression of inflammatory mediators and increased neutrophilic infiltration. In human UC samples, TLR4 expression was upregulated in almost all colitis-associated cancer and progressively increased with grade of dysplasia. As a proof of principle, a TLR4/MD-2 antagonist antibody inhibited colitis-associated neoplasia in the mouse model.
Our results show that regulation of TLRs can affect the outcome of both acute colitis and its consequences, cancer. Targeting TLR4 and other TLRs may ultimately play a role in prevention or treatment of colitis-associated cancer.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 07/2011; 17(7):1464-73. · 4.86 Impact Factor
-
Yasmin Hernandez, John Sotolongo,
Keith Breglio,
Daisy Conduah,
Anli Chen,
Ruliang Xu,
David Hsu,
Ryan Ungaro,
Lory Hayes,
Cristhine Pastorini,
Maria Abreu,
Masayuki Fukata
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Abstract
Background
We have previously found that TLR4-deficient (TLR4-/-) mice demonstrate decreased expression of mucosal PGE <sub>2 </sub>and are protected against colitis-associated neoplasia. However, it is still unclear whether PGE <sub>2 </sub>is the central factor downstream of TLR4 signaling that promotes intestinal tumorigenesis. To further elucidate critical downstream pathways involving TLR4-mediated intestinal tumorigenesis, we examined the effects of exogenously administered PGE <sub>2 </sub>in TLR4-/- mice to see if PGE <sub>2 </sub>bypasses the protection from colitis-associated tumorigenesis.
Method
Mouse colitis-associated neoplasia was induced by azoxymethane (AOM) injection followed by two cycles of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) treatment. Two different doses of PGE <sub>2 </sub>(high dose group, 200 μg, n = 8; and low dose group, 100 μg, n = 6) were administered daily during recovery period of colitis by gavage feeding. Another group was given PGE <sub>2 </sub>during DSS treatment (200 μg, n = 5). Inflammation and dysplasia were assessed histologically. Mucosal Cox-2 and amphiregulin (AR) expression, prostanoid synthesis, and EGFR activation were analyzed.
Results
In control mice treated with PBS, the average number of tumors was greater in WT mice (n = 13) than in TLR4-/- mice (n = 7). High dose but not low dose PGE <sub>2 </sub>treatment caused an increase in epithelial proliferation. 28.6% of PBS-treated TLR4-/- mice developed dysplasia (tumors/animal: 0.4 ± 0.2). By contrast, 75.0% (tumors/animal: 1.5 ± 1.2, P < 0.05) of the high dose group and 33.3% (tumors/animal: 0.3 ± 0.5) of the low dose group developed dysplasia in TLR4-/- mice. Tumor size was also increased by high dose PGE <sub>2 </sub>treatment. Endogenous prostanoid synthesis was differentially affected by PGE <sub>2 </sub>treatment during acute and recovery phases of colitis. Exogenous administration of PGE <sub>2 </sub>increased colitis-associated tumorigenesis but this only occurred during the recovery phase. Lastly, PGE <sub>2 </sub>treatment increased mucosal expression of AR and Cox-2, thus inducing EGFR activation and forming a positive feedback mechanism to amplify mucosal Cox-2.
Conclusions
These results highlight the importance of PGE <sub>2 </sub>as a central downstream molecule involving TLR4-mediated intestinal tumorigenesis.
BMC Gastroenterology. 01/2010;
-
Yasmin Hernandez, John Sotolongo,
Keith Breglio,
Daisy Conduah,
Anli Chen,
Ruliang Xu,
David Hsu,
Ryan Ungaro,
Lory A Hayes,
Cristhine Pastorini,
Maria T Abreu,
Masayuki Fukata
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We have previously found that TLR4-deficient (TLR4-/-) mice demonstrate decreased expression of mucosal PGE 2 and are protected against colitis-associated neoplasia. However, it is still unclear whether PGE 2 is the central factor downstream of TLR4 signaling that promotes intestinal tumorigenesis. To further elucidate critical downstream pathways involving TLR4-mediated intestinal tumorigenesis, we examined the effects of exogenously administered PGE 2 in TLR4-/- mice to see if PGE 2 bypasses the protection from colitis-associated tumorigenesis.
Mouse colitis-associated neoplasia was induced by azoxymethane (AOM) injection followed by two cycles of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) treatment. Two different doses of PGE 2 (high dose group, 200 microg, n = 8; and low dose group, 100 microg, n = 6) were administered daily during recovery period of colitis by gavage feeding. Another group was given PGE 2 during DSS treatment (200 microg, n = 5). Inflammation and dysplasia were assessed histologically. Mucosal Cox-2 and amphiregulin (AR) expression, prostanoid synthesis, and EGFR activation were analyzed.
In control mice treated with PBS, the average number of tumors was greater in WT mice (n = 13) than in TLR4-/- mice (n = 7). High dose but not low dose PGE 2 treatment caused an increase in epithelial proliferation. 28.6% of PBS-treated TLR4-/- mice developed dysplasia (tumors/animal: 0.4 +/- 0.2). By contrast, 75.0% (tumors/animal: 1.5 +/- 1.2, P < 0.05) of the high dose group and 33.3% (tumors/animal: 0.3 +/- 0.5) of the low dose group developed dysplasia in TLR4-/- mice. Tumor size was also increased by high dose PGE 2 treatment. Endogenous prostanoid synthesis was differentially affected by PGE 2 treatment during acute and recovery phases of colitis. Exogenous administration of PGE 2 increased colitis-associated tumorigenesis but this only occurred during the recovery phase. Lastly, PGE 2 treatment increased mucosal expression of AR and Cox-2, thus inducing EGFR activation and forming a positive feedback mechanism to amplify mucosal Cox-2.
These results highlight the importance of PGE 2 as a central downstream molecule involving TLR4-mediated intestinal tumorigenesis.
BMC Gastroenterology 01/2010; 10:82. · 2.42 Impact Factor
-
Ryan Ungaro,
Masayuki Fukata,
David Hsu,
Yasmin Hernandez,
Keith Breglio,
Anli Chen,
Ruliang Xu, John Sotolongo,
Cecillia Espana,
Julia Zaias,
Greg Elson,
Lloyd Mayer,
Marie Kosco-Vilbois,
Maria T Abreu
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Dysregulated innate immune responses to commensal bacteria contribute to the development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). TLR4 is overexpressed in the intestinal mucosa of IBD patients and may contribute to uncontrolled inflammation. However, TLR4 is also an important mediator of intestinal repair. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of a TLR4 antagonist on inflammation and intestinal repair in two murine models of IBD. Colitis was induced in C57BL/6J mice with dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) or by transferring CD45Rb(hi) T cells into RAG1-/- mice. An antibody (Ab) against the TLR4/MD-2 complex or isotype control Ab was administered intraperitoneally during DSS treatment, recovery from DSS colitis, or induction of colitis in RAG1-/- mice. Colitis severity was assessed by disease activity index (DAI) and histology. The effect of the Ab on the inflammatory infiltrate was determined by cell isolation and immunohistochemistry. Mucosal expression of inflammatory mediators was analyzed by real-time PCR and ELISA. Blocking TLR4 at the beginning of DSS administration delayed the development of colitis with significantly lower DAI scores. Anti-TLR4 Ab treatment decreased macrophage and dendritic cell infiltrate and reduced mucosal expression of CCL2, CCL20, TNF-alpha, and IL-6. Anti-TLR4 Ab treatment during recovery from DSS colitis resulted in defective mucosal healing with lower expression of COX-2, PGE(2), and amphiregulin. In contrast, TLR4 blockade had minimal efficacy in ameliorating inflammation in the adoptive transfer model of chronic colitis. Our findings suggest that anti-TLR4 therapy may decrease inflammation in IBD but may also interfere with colonic mucosal healing.
AJP Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 05/2009; 296(6):G1167-79. · 3.43 Impact Factor