-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A 47-year-old male had bilateral upper extremity thrombophlebitis after use of intravenous amiodarone for sustained ventricular tachycardia complicating myocardial infarction. Intravenous amiodarone has been widely used since it was introduced 20 years ago for severe intractable arrhythmias. Superficial thrombophlebitis was frequently noted in the early case reports when high-dose intravenous amiodarone was used. Superficial thrombophlebitis could extend hospitalization and become a significant source of distress to our patients. Some authors recommend insertion of a central line to administer intravenous amiodarone especially with expected extended use of therapy. The treating physician should be vigilant and switch from intravenous therapy to oral therapy as soon as the patient's condition stabilizes and oral therapy can be started.
Southern Medical Journal 09/2005; 98(8):814-6. · 0.83 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We report a patient with an evidence of bilateral calf deep vein thrombosis, hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism, and echocardiographic evidence of right heart thromboemboli with "popcorn" appearance. She responded well to thrombolytics and low molecular weight heparin with resolution of symptoms and improvement of echocardiographic abnormalities.
Tennessee medicine: journal of the Tennessee Medical Association 02/2004; 97(1):34-6.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A 71-year-old white woman presented to her primary care physician for a routine visit and was found to have a new, previously undocumented cardiac murmur. A subsequent transthoracic echocardiogram revealed a 1 cm mobile mass arising from the lateral free wall of the left ventricle. Transesophageal echocardiography later confirmed these findings. The patient underwent a left ventriculotomy and excision of a.7 cm friable mass, which was later identified as a papillary fibroelastoma (PFE) by routine histopathologic studies. We present this unique case ith a review of the literature.
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 02/2003; 4(3):184-7. · 0.58 Impact Factor