-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: SMAD4 is a polypeptide with tumor suppressor function being investigated as a prognostic biomarker in Union Internationale Contre le Cancer stages II and III in previous studies, but its role as a prognostic marker in stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) is still undefined. We investigated the prognostic value of reduced SMAD4 expression in patients with metastatic (mCRC) under first-line oxaliplatin-containing combination chemotherapy.
Tumor samples were obtained from patients who took part in a prospective randomized phase III chemotherapy trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie of the German Cancer Society colorectal study group, comparing the use of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy in mCRC. SMAD4 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry.
Tumor tissues from 230 patients were obtained. Reduced SMAD4 expression was identified in 34% of samples. Patients with reduced nuclear SMAD4 expression in tumor tissue showed a shorter progression-free survival (PFS; 7.0 months vs. 8.9 months; P = .024) and overall survival (OS; 13.9 months vs. 17.8 months; P = .044) compared with patients retaining SMAD4 expression. The effect of SMAD4 expression on PFS and OS could be demonstrated in univariate and multivariate analyses.
Our data demonstrate the importance of reduced SMAD4 expression in patients with mCRC receiving chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and 5-FU.
Clinical Colorectal Cancer 03/2011; 10(1):24-9. · 1.68 Impact Factor
-
Martijn P Lolkema, Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau,
Kevin Harrington,
Patricia Roxburgh,
Rosemary Morrison,
Victoria Roulstone,
Katie Twigger,
Matt Coffey,
Karl Mettinger,
George Gill,
T R Jeffry Evans,
Johann S de Bono
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study combined systemic administration of the oncolytic reovirus type 3 Dearing (reovirus) with chemotherapy in human subjects. We aimed to determine the safety and feasibility of combining reovirus administration with gemcitabine and to describe the effects of gemcitabine on the antireoviral immune response.
Patients received reovirus in various doses, initially we dosed for five consecutive days but this was poorly tolerated. We amended the protocol to administer a single dose and administered up to 3 × 10(10) TCID(50). Toxicity was assessed by monitoring of clinical and laboratory measurements. We assessed antibody response by cytotoxicity neutralization assay.
Sixteen patients received 47 cycles of reovirus. The two initial patients and one patient in the final cohort experienced dose limiting toxicity (DLT). The DLTs consisted of two asymptomatic grade 3 liver enzyme rises and one asymptomatic grade 3 troponin I rise. Common toxicities consisted of known reovirus and gemcitabine associated side effects. Further analysis showed a potential interaction between reovirus and gemcitabine in causing liver enzyme rises. Grade 3 rises in liver enzymes were associated with concomitant aminocetophen use. Importantly, the duration of the liver enzyme rise was short and reversible. Neutralizing antibody responses to reovirus were attenuated both in time-to-occurrence and peak height of the response.
Reovirus at the dose of 1 × 10(10) TCID(50) can be safely combined with full dose gemcitabine. Combination of reovirus with gemcitabine affects the neutralizing antibody response and this could impact both safety and efficacy of this treatment schedule.
Clinical Cancer Research 02/2011; 17(3):581-8. · 7.74 Impact Factor
-
Simon Pacey,
Richard H Wilson,
Mike Walton,
Martin M Eatock,
Anthea Hardcastle,
Anna Zetterlund, Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau,
Javier Moreno-Farre,
Udai Banerji,
Belle Roels,
Heidi Peachey,
Wynne Aherne,
Johan S de Bono,
Florence Raynaud,
Paul Workman,
Ian Judson
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A phase I study to define toxicity and recommend a phase II dose of the HSP90 inhibitor alvespimycin (17-DMAG; 17-dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin). Secondary endpoints included evaluation of pharmacokinetic profile, tumor response, and definition of a biologically effective dose (BED).
Patients with advanced solid cancers were treated with weekly, intravenous (i.v.) 17-DMAG. An accelerated titration dose escalation design was used. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was the highest dose at which ≤ 1/6 patients experienced dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Dose de-escalation from the MTD was planned with mandatory, sequential tumor biopsies to determine a BED. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assays were validated prior to patient accrual.
Twenty-five patients received 17-DMAG (range 2.5-106 mg/m(2)). At 106 mg/m(2) of 17-DMAG 2/4 patients experienced DLT, including one treatment-related death. No DLT occurred at 80 mg/m(2). Common adverse events were gastrointestinal, liver function changes, and ocular. Area under the curve and mean peak concentration increased proportionally with 17-DMAG doses 80 mg/m(2) or less. In peripheral blood mononuclear cells significant (P < 0.05) HSP72 induction was detected (≥ 20 mg/m(2)) and sustained for 96 hours (≥ 40 mg/m(2)). Plasma HSP72 levels were greatest in the two patients who experienced DLT. At 80 mg/m(2) client protein (CDK4, LCK) depletion was detected and tumor samples from 3 of 5 patients confirmed HSP90 inhibition. Clinical activity included complete response (castration refractory prostate cancer, CRPC 124 weeks), partial response (melanoma, 159 weeks), and stable disease (chondrosarcoma, CRPC, and renal cancer for 28, 59, and 76 weeks, respectively).
The recommended phase II dose of 17-DMAG is 80 mg/m(2) weekly i.v.
Clinical Cancer Research 02/2011; 17(6):1561-70. · 7.74 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Introduction. A survey was sent to referring oncologists (ROs) to explore the reasons behind their referral patterns and perceptions of Phase I studies before and after being provided with outcome data from advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) patients who participated in Phase I trials at the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH). Results. The response rate was 32/50 (64%). The most common reason for referral was exhaustion of standard treatments (31%), and the main reason for referring to the RMH was proximity to patients (28%). The most frequent clinical parameter assessed prior to referral was performance status (93%). ROs spent a median of 15 min (range: 5-45 min) discussing general aspects of Phase I trials. In the second part of the questionnaire, after reviewing clinical outcome data of ACRC patients who participated in Phase I trials, 47% would change their approach, specifically, spend more time to discuss risks and benefits of Phase I trials (9%), consider prognostic factors before referral (13%), and increase the number of referrals (25%). Conclusion. This is the first report focusing on communication between ROs and a specialist Phase I unit. Outcome reporting can improve communication with ROs and importantly has the potential for better patient selection considered for Phase I oncology trials.
Journal of Oncology 01/2011; 2011:861401.
-
Andre T Brunetto,
Joo Ern Ang,
David Olmos,
Daniel Tan,
Jorge Barriuso, Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau,
Timothy A Yap,
L Rhoda Molife,
Udai Banerji,
Johann de Bono,
Ian Judson,
Stan Kaye
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Unplanned hospital admissions (UHAs) in the context of oncology Phase I trials are important, yet rarely reported.
All patients admitted to the Royal Marsden Hospital Phase I clinical trials unit during February and March of 2005-2007 were included. The patient-, admission- and trial-related variables were collected. Correlations were sought between the occurrence of UHAs and the baseline patient/trial-related characteristics.
Of the 308 admissions involving 177 patients, UHAs constituted 21% of all the admissions and 38% of the total bed occupancy. The majority of UHAs were cancer related (78%) and their occurrence was associated with a significant early patient attrition. Using multivariate analysis, the factors significantly associated with UHAs included age >60 years (RR 2.32, confidence interval (CI)-95% 1.12-4.81), ≥3 metastatic sites (RR 3.26, CI-95% 1.54-6.90) and LDH>ULN (RR 2.18, CI-95% 1.06-4.46), with albumin <35 g/dL trending to significance (p=0.052). The trials that contained cytotoxic chemotherapy incurred disproportionately higher rates of admissions (69.5%) than the trials that did not.
UHAs constitute a substantial workload and impact on the speed and cost of, as well as resource allocation in Phase I oncology trials. The majority of UHAs are cancer rather than treatment related. The risk stratification to guide patient selection may help reduce the incidence of UHAs.
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 10/2010; 46(15):2739-45. · 4.12 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Reporting of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) often is suboptimal. Cancer drug trials are complicated further by multiple survival and response endpoints. The authors of this report determined the frequency of reporting of time-to-event endpoints and tumor response outcomes in advanced colorectal cancer and examined the relation between the year of publication and the reported effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil or equivalent agents.
A literature search identified 144 RCTs that involved 35,853 patients. The patient characteristics, trial designs, and methods for endpoint reporting were extracted. The clinical effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil or equivalent agents was analyzed in 3 time periods (pre-1990, 1990s, and 2000s) in 28,636 patients.
One hundred twenty-nine trials (90%) reported overall survival (OS) and response rates; whereas time to progression (44%), duration of response (43%), progression-free survival (22%), and time to treatment failure (12%) were reported less frequently. Except for stable and progressive disease, the frequency of reporting of endpoints did not improve over the period studied. The median OS for patients who received 5-fluorouracil or equivalent agents increased significantly (from 9.4 months before 1990 to 13.5 months after 2000). During the same period, the rate of stable disease increased (38.2%, 40.5%, and 45.1% for pre-1990, 1990s, and 2000s, respectively; P = .004); whereas the rate of progressive disease decreased significantly (39.2%, 33.3%, and 27.8%, respectively; P = .002).
Its likely that the increasing availability of alternative treatments and better supportive care improved OS, whereas the rates of stable and progressive disease altered because of changes in follow-up schedules. Other intermediate endpoints (duration of response and time to progression) remained largely constant over the time course of the current study, making them superior benchmarks for comparison with future studies.
Cancer 09/2010; 117(4):832-40. · 4.77 Impact Factor
-
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide with approximately one million cases diagnosed annually. Despite considerable improvements in surgical techniques, innovations in clinical diagnostics and the development of new chemotherapy regimens, the clinical outcome for patients with advanced gastric cancer and cancer of the GEJ is generally poor with 5-year survival rates ranging between 5 and 15%. The understanding of cancer relevant events has resulted in new therapeutic strategies, particularly in developing of new molecular targeted agents. These agents have the ability to target a variety of cancer relevant receptors and downstream pathways including the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), the insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR), the c-Met pathway, cell-cycle pathways, and down-stream signalling pathways such as the Akt-PI3k-mTOR pathway. In the era of new molecularly targeted agents this review focuses on recent developments of targeting relevant pathways involved in gastric cancer and cancer of the GEJ.
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 05/2009; 135(7):855-66. · 2.56 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: With the aim of improving patient selection for phase I trials, we previously performed a retrospective analysis of 212 phase I oncology patients where we were able to develop a prognostic score predicting overall survival (OS). This prospective study was performed to test the validity of the prognostic score.
On the basis of our retrospective multivariate analysis, three factors were associated with poor survival (albumin < 35 g/L, lactate dehydrogenase [LDH] > upper limit of normal [ULN], and > two sites of metastases). We integrated these into a prognostic score ranging from 0 to 3 and analyzed this score in a prospectively selected cohort of 78 patients enrolled onto phase I trials.
All patients had progressive disease before study entry. The median age was 56 years (range, 18 to 79 years). After a median follow-up time of 27.3 weeks, patients with a prognostic score of 0 to 1 (n = 43) had superior OS (33.0 weeks; 95% CI, 24 to 42 weeks) compared with patients with a score of 2 to 3 (n = 35; 15.7 weeks; 95% CI, 11 to 21 weeks). Our multivariate analysis confirmed that our prognostic score was an independent marker for OS, with a hazard ratio of 1.4 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.9; P = .036).
This is the first prospective analysis confirming that a prognostic score based on objective markers, including albumin less than 35 g/L, LDH more than ULN, and more than two sites of metastasis, is a helpful tool in the process of patient selection for phase I trial entry.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 04/2009; 27(16):2692-6. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Standard treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) includes fluoropyrimidines in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan. The addition of targeted agents such as bevacizumab and cetuximab to these chemotherapy backbones further improved outcome with survival rates. However, even after intensive treatment, most tumors will subsequently progress and some patients are offered experimental phase I therapies.
We retrospectively analyzed the outcome for 78 ACRC patients treated consecutively within 23 phase I trials at the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) between January 2004 and January 2008.
The median age was 62 years (range 26-78). After a median follow-up time of 21.4 weeks (range 1.7-115.6) the median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 8.6 weeks (95% CI: 6.4-10.7) and 29.1 weeks (95% CI: 15.7-42.5), respectively. 28.8 and 8.2% of the patients were assessed as having stable disease (SD) at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Patients with SD had an OS of 40.6 weeks (95% CI: 32.9-48.2) compared to 17.4 weeks (95% CI: 14.0-20.8, p = 0.017) for patients with progressive disease.
A limited number of patients with ACRC who failed conventional treatments can derive clinical benefit by participating in phase I cancer trials, and the use of the RMH prognostic score can help to identify these patients.
Oncology 02/2009; 76(3):151-6. · 2.27 Impact Factor
-
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau,
Dirk Arnold,
Jim Cassidy,
Eduardo Diaz-Rubio,
Jean-Yves Douillard,
Howard Hochster,
Andrea Martoni,
Axel Grothey,
Axel Hinke,
Wolff Schmiegel,
Hans-Joachim Schmoll,
Rainer Porschen
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Six randomized phase II and III trials have investigated the role of oxaliplatin (OX) in combination with capecitabine (CAP) or infusional fluorouracil (FU) in metastatic colorectal cancer. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy of CAP/OX compared with infusional FU/OX.
This analysis compared all published CAP/OX versus infusional FU/OX regimens. A total of 3,494 patients (FU, n = 1,737; CAP, n = 1,757) were analyzed for response rate (RR), progression-free (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.
The fixed-effect pooled estimate for RR showed higher RR for FU-based regimens (Odds ratio [OR] = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.97; P = .02) whereas the analysis of chemotherapy-only trials, excluding the bevacizumab containing NO16966 and TREE 2 trials, led to an OR of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.92; P = .007). However, for PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.12; P = .17) and OS (HR = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.12; P = .41) all models suggested similar outcome within the range of noninferiority. Grade 3/4 toxicities (thrombocytopenia-HR = 2.07, 95% CI, 1.42 to 3.03; P < .0002; diarrhea-HR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.66; P < .0009; and grade 2/3 hand-foot-syndrome [HFS]-HR = 3.54; 95% CI, 2.07 to 6.05; P < .00001) were less prominent with FU-based regimens whereas neutropenia (HR = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.19; P < .00001) was lower in the CAP regimens.
The combination of CAP and OX resulted in lower RR, but this did not affect PFS and OS, which were similar in both treatment arms. The toxicity analysis showed the characteristic toxicity of each of the different FU schedules, with thrombocytopenia and HFS consistently more prominent in the CAP regimens.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 11/2008; 26(36):5910-7. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The primary objectives of phase-I trials include the definition of drug toxicities and the recommendation of phase-II doses. In order to safeguard the well-being of its participants, a common inclusion criterion is that of life expectancy >3 months. However, previous studies have shown that about 20% of these patients do not survive beyond this time-point.
We identified 97 patients who died within the first 90 days of treatment out of a total of 654 consecutively treated phase-I patients, from June 2003 to June 2007. This cohort was compared to a control group comprising 215 patients who lived >90 days on phase-I studies and were treated from January 2005 to June 2006.
In keeping with our recently reported phase-I survival risk score, multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients who died within the first 90 days had lower albumin (p=0.010), greater number of metastatic sites (p=0.00001) and higher frequency of elevated LDH (p=0.0002). This analysis also showed that 86% of patients who died during the first 90 days had an increased risk score of 2/3 compared to 39% in the control group. Furthermore, three additional factors were identified, namely younger age (p=0.024), higher white cell count (p=0.028) and poorer ECOG PS (p=0.012) but the addition of these did not improve the ability to predict 90-day mortality compared to the afore-mentioned risk score.
There is good evidence that our easily derivable scoring system provides an objective method to identify patients with a very limited life expectancy in whom participation in phase-I trials should be carefully evaluated.
European Journal of Cancer 07/2008; 44(11):1536-40. · 5.54 Impact Factor
-
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau,
Ullrich Graeven,
Stephan Kubicka,
Axel Grothey,
Christina Englisch-Fritz,
Albrecht Kretzschmar,
Richard Greil,
Werner Freier,
Thomas Seufferlein,
Axel Hinke,
Hans-Joachim Schmoll,
Wolff Schmiegel,
Rainer Porschen
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We evaluated the outcome of 140 patients aged > or = 70 years of age who received first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer within the German phase III trial of FUFOX (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin) versus CAPOX (capecitabine/oxaliplatin).
One hundred forty (30%) elderly patients of 476 total patients were identified, and 138 patients received the CAPOX or FUFOX treatment.
Overall, treatment was well tolerated, and grade 3/4 toxicities were similar in both groups, with more gastrointestinal side effects in the elderly group but less neurosensory side effects. The response rate (RR) was comparable between both cohorts (49% in elderly patients vs. 52% in patients aged < 70 years). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months for patients aged > or = 70 years and 7.5 months for patients aged < 70 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% CI, 0.86-1.34). With regard to the chemotherapy regimen, there was no inferiority between FUFOX and CAPOX in patients aged > or = 70 years (7.9 months vs. 7.6 months). The median overall survival (OS) between FUFOX and CAPOX was comparable in patients aged > or = 70 years (14.4 months vs. 14.2 months). However, when compared with patients aged < 70 years, the median OS was significantly shorter (18.8 months vs. 14.4 months; P = 0.013; HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.07-1.76). This was consistent with our multivariate analysis, which revealed that age > or = 70 years was a negative factor for OS.
Oxaliplatin combined with 5-FU/leucovorin or capecitabine was generally well tolerated in elderly patients. Elderly patients had similar PFS and overall RRs compared with the population aged < 70 years, but the OS was shorter.
Clinical Colorectal Cancer 01/2008; 7(1):60-4. · 1.68 Impact Factor
-
Rainer Porschen, Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau,
Stephan Kubicka,
Richard Greil,
Thomas Seufferlein,
Werner Freier,
Albrecht Kretzschmar,
Ullrich Graeven,
Axel Grothey,
Axel Hinke,
Wolff Schmiegel,
Hans-Joachim Schmoll
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To compare the use of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) with infusional fluorouracil (FU)/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FUFOX) as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).
A total of 474 patients with MCRC received either CAPOX (capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 bid, days 1 to 14 plus oxaliplatin 70 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, repeated every 22 days) ) or FUFOX (oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 followed by leucovorin 500 mg/m2 plus FU 2,000 mg/m2 as a 22-hour infusion days 1, 8, 15, and 22, repeated every 36 days). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure, and toxicity. The study was designed to determine noninferiority for the CAPOX regimen.
Median PFS was 7.1 months in the CAPOX arm and 8.0 months in the FUFOX arm (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.43; P = .117). Median OS was 16.8 months (CAPOX) and 18.8 months (FUFOX; HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.38; P = .26). Overall RRs were 48% for CAPOX (95% CI, 41% to 54%) and 54% for FUFOX (95% CI, 47% to 60%). Both regimens were generally well tolerated, although there was a significantly higher incidence of grade 2/3 hand-foot syndrome (HFS) in the CAPOX arm (P = .028).
CAPOX resulted in a slightly inferior efficacy than FUFOX. With respect to PFS, the best estimate of the HR of 1.17 was within the prespecified equivalence range. However, a relevant inferiority cannot be excluded. Both regimens were generally well tolerated but there was a significantly higher rate of grade 2/3 HFS in the CAPOX arm.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 10/2007; 25(27):4217-23. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the Western world, with > 500,000 new cases diagnosed each year. One of the strongest risk factors for colon cancer is age. The incidence rates rise from 10 in 100,000 at age 40-45 years to 300 in 100,000 at age 75-80 years, with the median age at diagnosis of CRC being 71 years. With the general demographic shift toward an aging population, the number of people aged > 65 years is expected to increase. This article reviews the development of treatment for elderly patients with metastatic CRC, from single-agent fluoropyrimidines to combination therapies.
Clinical Colorectal Cancer 05/2007; 6(7):508-15. · 1.68 Impact Factor
-
Leukemia and Lymphoma 05/2007; 48(4):819-22. · 2.58 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Novel, effective therapies are needed for peripheral T-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (PTCL). We treated 16 patients with a combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone (GEM-P). Three patients (19%) achieved a complete remission and eight (50%) a partial remission. GEM-P has encouraging efficacy with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with PTCL.
Haematologica 03/2007; 92(2):271-2. · 6.42 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma of the lung is a rare disease with an indolent clinical behaviour. This single centre retrospective analysis evaluates the treatment strategies and clinical outcome for these patients. A total number of ten patients (7 male/3 female) were identified between January 1997 and October 2005 and their records analysed. At diagnosis the patients presented with unspecific symptoms (cough, shortness of breath and lower respiratory chest infection) which were further evaluated. Six patients had stage IAE disease, two patients stage IIAE and in two patients disease was stage IV. The initial treatment consisted of surgery alone (3 patients), chemotherapy +/- rituximab (5/1 patients), single agent rituximab (1 patient) and wait & watch strategy (1 patient). After a median follow-up time of 3.4 years the overall survival was 90% at 3 years. In conclusion, our data suggest that most of the patients with MALT of the lung had localized disease which generally responded well to systemic or local therapy and resulted in favourable long-term outcome underlining the indolent course of this disease.
Leukemia and Lymphoma 03/2007; 48(3):547-50. · 2.58 Impact Factor
