-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Few studies have adequately examined the efficacy of lamivudine plus adefovir (LAM+ADV) combination therapy vs. entecavir (ETV) monotherapy in HBeAg-positive hepatitis B patients who fail to respond to sequential treatment with LAM and ADV. We compared directly the efficacy of LAM+ADV vs. ETV in such patients and assessed prognostic factors associated with a virologic response at month 12.
In total, 72 HBeAg-positive patients who showed resistance (n = 33) or a suboptimal virologic response (n = 39) to ADV monotherapy with resistance to LAM therapy underwent rescue therapy (31 LAM+ADV and 41 ETV). All patients were followed for at least 12 months.
Following 12 months of treatment, in the LAM+ADV and ETV groups, a virologic response was observed in 7/31 (22.6%) and 8/41 (19.5%; P = 0.777) patients; ALT normalization occurred in 11/13 (84.6%) and 16/18 (88.9%; P = 0.566); HBeAg seroconversion in 1/31 (2.3%) and 4/41 (9.8%; P = 0.341) and a virologic breakthrough in 3/31 (9.0%) and 5/41 (12.1%; P = 0.452) respectively. Independent prognostic factors associated with a virologic response were the baseline HBV-DNA level (OR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.17-0.80; P = 0.011) and the duration of prior ADV monotherapy (OR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.95; P = 0.044).
Neither LAM+ADV nor ETV was adequately effective in patients with sequential LAM and ADV treatment failure. Thus, when chronic hepatitis B patients show resistance or suboptimal response to ADV monotherapy, early modification of treatment should be considered.
Liver international: official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 03/2012; 32(7):1179-85. · 3.82 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Few studies have reported on the clinical characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at the time of diagnosis with regard to pre-S and basal core promoter (BCP) mutations. In this study, the clinical features and prognosis of 126 Korean HCC patients were examined with respect to pre-S deletion and BCP mutations of hepatitis B virus. The proportion of HCC patients according to tumor-node-metastasis stage are as follows: 8.7% in stage I, 31% in stage II, 30.2% in stage III, 21.4% in stage IV-A, and 8.7% in stage IV-B. Overall, 40.5% of HCC patients were treated by surgery or ablation, 59.5% by other methods. Patients were divided according to pre-S deletion and BCP mutations (103 without pre-S deletion, 23 with pre-S deletion; 44 without BCP mutation, 82 with BCP mutation). The tumor characteristics and prognosis were evaluated between the groups, including size, number, type, vessel invasion, portal vein thrombosis, and metastasis. No significant difference in tumor characteristics between the HCC patients with pre-S deletion was observed, compared with the HCC patients without pre-S deletion. In contrast, the survival rate was lower in those with pre-S deletion than in those without it (P = 0.024). No difference in tumor characteristics was found in non-BCP and BCP mutation patients. Unlike the pre-S deletion group, no difference was observed in survival rate between the non-BCP and BCP patients. In conclusion, pre-S deletion and BCP mutations did not affect the initial tumor features. However, pre-S deletion was an independent risk factor affecting HCC survival.
Journal of Medical Virology 12/2011; 83(12):2088-95. · 2.82 Impact Factor
-
Myoung Ha Lee,
Do Young Kim,
Ja Kyung Kim,
Hye Young Chang,
Se Hun Kang, Han Jak Ryu,
Hye-Lim Ju,
Seung Up Kim,
Jung Min Lee,
Jun Yong Park,
Kwang-Hyub Han,
Chae Yoon Chon,
Sang Hoon Ahn
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The interactions among hepatitis B virus (HBV) mutations in developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear and thus we investigated the risk of HCC related with single or multiple HBV mutations in Korean patients infected with HBV subgenotype C2.
From January 2003 to December 2008, HBV isolates from 135 patients with HCC were compared with those from 135 patients without HCC, matching for age, gender, and HBeAg status. The prevalence of preS deletions and G1896A and A1762T/G1764A mutations was evaluated.
The frequency of preS deletions significantly differed between the non-HCC and HCC groups, with 6 (4.4%) versus 25 (18.5%) patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Additionally, the frequency of A1762T/G1764A mutations was higher in the HCC than the non-HCC group [82 (60.7%) versus 30 (22.2%), p < 0.001]. For combined mutations, the odds ratio (OR) was highest in patients with both preS deletions and the A1762T/G1764A mutation, with 1 (0.7%) versus 11 (8.1%) patients (p = 0.005; OR 11.887).
HCC was associated with preS deletions and A1762T/G1764A mutations, and the combination of both mutations had a stronger association with HCC in Korean patients infected with HBV subgenotype C2.
Intervirology 08/2011; 55(4):296-302. · 2.34 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: No study has reported on the comparative effect of adefovir (ADV) add-on lamivudine (LAM) versus switching to entecavir (ETV) in LAM-resistant patients with chronic hepatitis B. From October 2007 to September 2008, 92 consecutive LAM-resistant patients were enrolled (47 LAM+ADV and 45 ETV 1 mg). All patients were followed for at least 12 months. The parameters assessed included normalization of ALT, HBeAg seroconversion, undetectable HBV DNA, reduction of HBV DNA, and predictors of virologic response. In the LAM+ADV and ETV groups, the baseline DNA levels were 7.61 (5.19-9.49) and 7.10 (5.43-9.74)log(10)copies/ml, respectively. At month 12, a virologic response occurred in 18/47 (38.3%) and 11/45 (24.4%; P=0.182) patients; ALT normalization, in 39/41 (95.1%) and 36/40 (90.0%; P=0.432); HBeAg seroconversion, in 5.1% and 2.4% (P=0.606); and virologic breakthrough, in 2.1% and 11.1% (P=0.107), respectively. The mean reduction from the baseline HBV DNA level was greater in the LAM+ADV group at month 12 (3.80 ± 1.12 vs. 2.7 ± 1.32 log(10)copies/ml; P<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the independent parameters related to a virologic response at month 12 were baseline ALT (OR=1.003, 95% CI=1.000-1.006, P=0.026) and baseline HBV DNA (OR=0.495, 95% CI=0.298-0.823, P=0.007). Compared with switching to ETV monotherapy, ADV add-on LAM therapy was more effective at reducing the viral load in patients with LAM resistance, and the baseline HBV DNA and ALT levels were independent predictors of the virologic response. However, ADV add-on therapy had limitations in patients with a higher baseline HBV DNA in LAM rescue therapy.
Journal of Medical Virology 11/2010; 82(11):1835-42. · 2.82 Impact Factor
