Haeng Rang Ryu

Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

Are you Haeng Rang Ryu?

Claim your profile

Publications (6)27.37 Total impact

  • Article: A Comparison of Postoperative Pain After Conventional Open Thyroidectomy and Transaxillary Single-Incision Robotic Thyroidectomy: A Prospective Study.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare conventional open thyroidectomy with robotic thyroidectomy in terms of postoperative pain. METHODS: We compared the intensity of postoperative pain experienced by patients who received conventional open thyroidectomy (n = 45) versus those who underwent robotic thyroidectomy (n = 45). During surgery, we carefully controlled the anesthetic conditions. All the patients underwent a total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral central compartment node dissection. Postoperative pain in the 2 groups was compared using a visual analog scale and the amount of rescue analgesic at 30 min, 4 h, 1, 2, 3, and 10 days after surgery. RESULTS: The postoperative pain at 30 min and 4 h after surgery were 3.0 ± 0.9 and 2.6 ± 0.9 (p = .066) and 4.9 ± 1.3 and 4.4 ± 1.3 (p = .055) in the conventional open group and the robotic group, respectively. The mean pain scores at 1, 2, 3, and 10 days after surgery were 3.8 ± 1.3 and 3.0 ± 1.3 (p = .001), 2.6 ± 1.2 and 2.0 ± 0.9 (p = .005), 1.7 ± 0.9 and 1.3 ± 0.6 (p = .034), and 0.9 ± 0.7 and 1.2 ± 1.1 (p = .093), respectively. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative rescue analgesic use (1.1 ± 1.1 and 0.8 ± 0.9, p = .264). CONCLUSIONS: Even though robotic thyroidectomy using the transaxillary technique requires a more extensive subcutaneous dissection than conventional open thyroidectomy, robotic thyroidectomy does not result in more postoperative pain or use of analgesic when compared with open thyroidectomy.
    Annals of Surgical Oncology 03/2013; · 4.17 Impact Factor
  • Article: Early surgical outcomes comparison between robotic and conventional open thyroid surgery for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Robotic operations have enabled a safer and more meticulous approach to thyroidectomy with the notable benefit of improved cosmesis and decreases in postoperative pain and swallowing discomfort. The aim of this study was to document the early surgical outcomes of robotic thyroidectomy in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) by comparing it with conventional open thyroidectomy. From October 2007 to September 2008, 458 patients with PTC underwent thyroidectomy at the Yonsei University Health System. Of these patients, 266 patients were in the conventional open group and 192 patients were in the robotic group. These 2 groups were compared retrospectively with respect to clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes. The mean follow-up period was 29.1 months. Mean tumor size, incidence of capsular invasion, multiplicity, and central nodal metastasis showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. Total thyroidectomy was performed more frequently in the open group. In terms of operation times, the robotic group had a significantly greater length of time for total thyroidectomy and subtotal thyroidectomy. The total number of retrieved central lymph nodes was greater in the open group (5.7 vs 4.6, P = .004). The 2 groups showed no differences in intraoperative and postoperative complications. The postoperative serum thyroglobulin levels were similar in both groups (0.25 vs 0.22 ng/mL, P = .648) and 2-year follow-up sonography of 433 patients revealed no recurrences. No abnormal I(131) uptake was observed in whole-body scans in either group. Robotic thyroidectomy was similar to conventional open thyroidectomy in terms of early surgical outcomes but offers advantages. We conclude that robotic thyroidectomy offers a safe, feasible alternative to conventional open thyroidectomy in patients with PTC.
    Surgery 01/2012; 151(5):724-30. · 3.10 Impact Factor
  • Article: Reply.
    Haeng Rang Ryu, Sang-Wook Kang, Woong Youn Chung
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons 06/2011; 212(6):1097-8. · 4.55 Impact Factor
  • Article: Excellence in robotic thyroid surgery: a comparative study of robot-assisted versus conventional endoscopic thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma patients.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To confirm the merits of robotic thyroid surgery by comparing the surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted and conventional endoscopic thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) patients. Robot-assisted surgical techniques are widely utilized, and substantially, overcome the limitations of conventional endoscopic surgery. Furthermore, recently, robotic procedures were introduced to the thyroidectomy field. From November 2001 to July 2009, 1150 patients with PTMC underwent endoscopic thyroidectomy using a gasless, trans-axillary approach. Of these patients, 580 underwent a robotic procedure (the robotic group; RG) and 570 a conventional endoscopic procedure (the conventional endoscopic group; EG). These 2 groups were retrospectively compared in terms of their clinicopathologic characteristics, early surgical outcomes, and surgical completeness. Total thyroidectomy was performed more frequently in the RG. Although mean operation times were not statistically different, the mean number of central nodes retrieved was greater in the RG than in the EG. Mean tumor size were not significantly different in the 2 groups, but the RG showed more frequent central node metastasis and capsular invasion. Tumor and nodal statuses in the RG were more advanced than in the EG. Regarding postoperative complications, transient hypocalcemia was more frequent in the RG, but other complication frequencies were not significantly different in the 2 groups. Postoperative serum thyroglobulin levels were similar in 2 groups, and short-term follow-up (1 year) revealed no recurrence by sonography and no abnormal uptake during radioactive iodine therapy in either group. The application of robotic technology to endoscopic thyroidectomy could overcome the limitations of conventional endoscopic surgery during the surgical management of PTMC.
    Annals of surgery 06/2011; 253(6):1060-6. · 7.90 Impact Factor
  • Article: Initial experience with robot-assisted modified radical neck dissection for the management of thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck node metastasis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since the introduction of endoscopic techniques in thyroid surgery, several trials of endoscopic lateral neck dissection have been conducted with the aim of avoiding a long cervical scar, but these endoscopic procedures require more effort than open surgery, mainly because of the relatively nonsophisticated instruments used. However, the recent introduction of surgical robotic systems has simplified the operations and increased the precision of endoscopic techniques. We have described our initial experience with robot-assisted modified radical neck dissection (MRND) in thyroid cancer using the da Vinci S system. From October 2007 to October 2009, 33 patients with thyroid cancer with lateral neck lymph node (LN) metastases underwent robot-assisted thyroidectomy and additional robotic MRND using a gasless, transaxillary approach. Clinicopathologic data were analyzed retrospectively. Mean patient age was 37 ± 9 years and the gender ratio (male to female) was 7:26. The mean operating time was 281 ± 41 minutes and mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.4 ± 1.6 days. The mean tumor size was 1.1 ± 0.5 cm and 20 cases (61%) had papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. The mean number of retrieved LNs was 6.1 ± 4.4 in the central neck compartment and 27.7 ± 11.0 in the lateral compartment. No serious postoperative complications, such as Horner's syndrome or major nerve injury, occurred. Robot-assisted MRND is technically feasible, safe, and produces excellent cosmetic results. Based on our initial experience, robot-assisted MRND should be viewed as an acceptable alternative method in patients with low-risk, well-differentiated thyroid cancer with lateral neck node metastasis.
    Surgery 12/2010; 148(6):1214-21. · 3.10 Impact Factor
  • Article: Feasibility and safety of a new robotic thyroidectomy through a gasless, transaxillary single-incision approach.
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons 09/2010; 211(3):e13-9. · 4.55 Impact Factor