Are you H J Moon?

Claim your profile

Publications (4)11.05 Total impact

  • Article: False Negative Results in Axillary Lymph Nodes by Ultrasonography and Ultrasonography-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Patients with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: For preoperative evaluation of ALN status using various methods, axillary US and subsequent US-FNA targeting the LNs suspicious for metastasis are the most widely used methods. The purpose of our study was to assess the rate of false-negative results at preoperative ultrasonography (US) and ultrasonography guided fine needle aspiration (US-FNA) of axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) in breast cancer patients and the number of false-negative lymph nodes, and to evaluate factors related to ALN false negative results in US and/or US-FNA in patients diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma. Materials and Methods: Among 317 patients who underwent surgery for invasive ductal carcinoma during 2009 in Severance hospital, 237 patients had no reported ALN metastasis on preoperative US-FNA and US. We retrospectively reviewed the subsequent surgical pathology and clinicopathologic findings and assessed the rate of false-negative results from US and US-FNA of ALN and the number of false-negative lymph node. We performed univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate the relationships between variable clinicopathologic factors (T-stage, position of ALN, hormone receptors, histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and performance of FNA) and cytologic results (false-negative result; FNALN and true negative result; TNALN) from US and/or US-FNA of ALN.Results: The rate of false-negative results was 42.4 % (59/139) in both US and US-FNA of ALN but among them, 57.6 % (34/59) showed only one metastatic ALN. Breast cancer with FNALN on US and US-FNA was significantly related to positive estrogen receptor (p = 0.003), positive progesterone receptor (p = 0.001), and the presence of LVI (p = 0.004) in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, high T stages (≥ T2, odds ratio (OR) 4.007, p = 0.004) and LVI (OR 7.951, p = 0.001) showed significant correlation with FNALN on US and US-FNA. Conclusion: More than half of patients with FNALN showed only one metastatic ALN. LVI and high T-stages were the most important factors attributed to FNALN on US and US-FNA in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Ultraschall in der Medizin 12/2012; · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • Article: Is US-guided Core Needle Biopsy (CNB) enough in Probably Benign Nodules with Interval Growth?
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To investigate whether ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy (US-CNB) is efficient in the diagnosis of probably benign lesions showing interval growth on follow-up US. Materials and Methods: From March 2008 to August 2009, 116 breast lesions in 113 women (mean age: 41.2 years, range: 19 - 63 years) which were initially assessed as category 3 showing interval growth on follow-up US underwent US-CNB, and subsequent US-guided vacuum-assisted excision, surgical excision or follow-up US for at least 12 months. Diagnostic performances of US-CNB were evaluated with histopathologic results and follow-up US as standard reference. Clinical features of the patient and lesions characteristics including follow-up interval (I), the most increased diameter (D), D per I, increased volume (%V) and %V per I were calculated and compared. Results: Of the 116 lesions, 4 lesions were diagnosed as malignancy and 112 as benign on final pathology. Malignancy rate of probably benign lesions showing interval growth was 3.4 % (4/116). Incorrect biopsy rate was 0.9 % (1/116). Palpability or newly developed suspicious US features were more associated with malignancy, 75.0 to 13.4 % and 50.0 to 25.9 %, respectively, but without significance (p = 0.063 and 0.290). Significant differences were seen in average rank when comparing between benign and malignancy in D, %V, D per follow-up interval (I), and %V/I (p = 0.037, 0.017, 0.043 and 0.009, respectively).Conclusion: US-CNB is an efficient diagnostic method for probably benign lesions showing interval growth, with discordant biopsy rate of 0.9 %.
    Ultraschall in der Medizin 09/2012; · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • Article: The diagnosis of non-malignant papillary lesions of the breast: comparison of ultrasound-guided automated gun biopsy and vacuum-assisted removal.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare the histological upgrade rate of ultrasound (US)-guided vacuum-assisted removal (VAR) and US-14 G-automated core needle biopsy (ACNB) in the diagnosis of papillary breast lesions. Two hundred and seventy-one biopsies of 230 papillary lesions were examined, which underwent subsequent surgical excision or long-term follow-up after US-ACNB (n = 206) or US-VAR (n = 65). The false-negative and atypical papilloma underestimation rate were compared between the ACNB and VAR groups. Patient and lesion characteristics were collected. The histological upgrade rates of the diagnosis were estimated and compared. Out of 271 papillary lesions, 195 (80.0%) were benign, 21 (7.7%) were atypical, and 55 (20.3%) were malignant. There were no false negatives or underestimated atypical papillomas in the VAR group. However, in the ACNB group, the false-negative rate was 7.6% (12 of 157 benign papillomas, 95% CI; 4.4-12.9%, p = 0.039) and the atypical papilloma underestimation rate was 33% (five of 15 atypical papillomas, 95% CI; 15.2-58.3%, p = 0.135). The histological upgrade rates of the diagnosis for papillary breast lesions were 0% for the VAR (0 of 66) group and 10.2% for the ACNB (21 of 206) group before adjusting for the population (p = 0.003). ACNB was associated with significantly higher false-negative and histological upgrade rates of diagnosis for papillary breast lesions than VAR.
    Clinical radiology 02/2011; 66(6):530-5. · 1.65 Impact Factor
  • Article: Value of specimen radiographs in diagnosing multifocality of thyroid cancer.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Specimen radiography has been used widely to evaluate the complete excision of calcified breast lesions but has not been evaluated for thyroid cancer. Specimen radiographs were evaluated retrospectively to identify additional cancers that were demonstrated only as calcifications. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to compare the combination of specimen radiography and ultrasonography versus ultrasonography alone for detecting multifocality. Some 122 thyroid cancer specimens were obtained from 122 patients between January and April 2008. Specimen radiography detected 27 cancers (18.5 per cent) not detected by ultrasonography. Diagnoses were changed after evaluation of specimen radiographs in three of these patients. The area under the curve of the combination of specimen radiography and ultrasonography was significantly higher than that of ultrasonography alone (P = 0.005). Specimen radiography is a potentially useful tool for diagnosing cancer type and predicting the extent of thyroid cancer.
    British Journal of Surgery 02/2010; 97(4):517-24. · 4.61 Impact Factor