-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Latarjet procedure [1], first described in 1958 and used to address anteroinferior shoulder instability, involves using
coracoid transfer to stabilize the shoulder by the static action of the transferred bone block and by the dynamic action of
the attached conjoined tendon sling (short head of biceps and coracobrachialis).
08/2011: pages 35-67;
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Latarjet procedure has been advocated as an option for the treatment of anteroinferior shoulder instability in certain patients. However, progression of the transferred coracoid bone graft to osteolysis has been reported in the literature. We propose that the coracoid bone graft osteolysis could be one of the causes of failure of the Latarjet procedure.
A computed tomography scan analysis was done of 26 patients prospectively followed-up after the Latarjet procedure to determine the location and the amount of the coracoid graft osteolysis.
The most relevant osteolysis was represented by the superficial part of the proximal coracoid, whereas the distal region of the coracoid bone graft, especially in the deep portion, was the least involved in osteolysis and had the best bone healing.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify and localize coracoid osteolysis after Latarjet procedure for anteroinferior shoulder instability using CT scan analysis.
Our study suggests that the bone-block effect from the Latarjet procedure may not be the principal effect in its treatment of anteroinferior shoulder instability in patients without significant bony defects.
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 03/2011; 20(6):989-95. · 1.93 Impact Factor
-
Giuseppe Mancia,
Enrico Agabiti Rosei,
Ettore Ambrosioni,
Francesco Avino,
Antonio Carolei,
Maurizio Daccò, Giovanni Di Giacomo,
Claudio Ferri,
Irene Grazioli,
Gabriella Melzi,
Giuseppe Nappi,
Lorenzo Pinessi,
Giorgio Sandrini,
Bruno Trimarco,
Giorgio Zanchin
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To estimate the prevalence of hypertension-migraine comorbidity; to determine their demographic and clinical characteristics versus patients with hypertension or migraine alone; and to see whether a history of cerebrovascular events was more common in the comorbidity group.
The MIRACLES, multicenter, cross-sectional, survey included 2973 patients with a known diagnosis of hypertension or migraine in a general practitioner setting in Italy.
Five hundred and seventeen patients (17%) suffered from hypertension-migraine comorbidity, whereas 1271 (43%) suffered from hypertension only, and 1185 (40%) from migraine only. In the comorbidity group, the onset of comorbidity occurred at about 45 years of age, with migraine starting significantly later than in the migraine-only group, and hypertension significantly before than in the hypertension-only group; a familial history of both hypertension and migraine had a significantly higher frequency as compared with the hypertension and migraine group. Compared to hypertension (3.1%) and migraine (0.7%), the comorbidity group had a higher prevalence (4.4%) of history of cerebrovascular events, with an odds ratio of a predicted history of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) of 1.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-3.07] compared to the hypertension group. In patients without other recognized risk factors for stroke, stroke/TIA occurred more frequently in the comorbidity group, compared to the hypertension group. In the age range 40-49 years, prevalence of history of stroke/TIA was five-fold greater (4.8% in comorbidity vs. 0.9% in hypertension group).
This cross-sectional study indicates that the prevalence of comorbidity hypertension-migraine is substantial and that patients with comorbidity have a higher probability of history of cerebrovascular events, compared to hypertensive patients.
Journal of hypertension 02/2011; 29(2):309-18. · 4.02 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to compare the new combination of intraarticular + subacromial injection, with intraarticular, subacromial injection and interscalenic brachial plexus block as postoperative analgesia in shoulder arthroscopy.
One hundred and twenty patients scheduled for shoulder arthroscopy were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of five groups: intraarticular, subacromial, interscalenic brachial plexus block (IBPB), intraarticular + subacromial (intraarticular + subacromial) injection or a control group. All patients received standardized general anaesthesia and all the injections were given with the same dose and volume of local anaesthetic. The number of boluses (fentanyl 1 microg kg(-1) delivered by a patient-controlled analgesia pump applied at the end of the surgery and the visual analogue pain score (VAPS) at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h after the intervention were recorded. A patient satisfaction score was also assessed at 24 h.
Mean bolus consumption, compared with control group, was significantly less in all groups (P < 0.01). Intraarticular + subacromial group utilized fewer boluses compared with subacromial group and significantly lower boluses than intraarticular group (P < 0.01), but IBPB group utilized significantly fewer boluses than intraarticular + subacromial group. Patients in IBPB, intraarticular + subacromial and subacromial groups showed VAPSs that were significantly better than that of the control group at all time points (P < 0.01). The VAPS in intraarticular + subacromial group was statistically comparable with those in IBPB and subacromial groups at each time interval. IBPB and intraarticular + subacromial groups showed comparable patient satisfaction scores.
These results confirm the analgesic efficacy of IBPB for shoulder surgery. Nonetheless, the combination of intraarticular and subacromial infiltration, studied for the first time, appears to be a clinically valid alternative with no clinical meaningful adverse effects.
European Journal of Anaesthesiology 08/2009; 26(8):689-93. · 2.23 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A 30 degrees arthroscope is introduced via the posterior soft spot portal, and an anterosuperior portal is created with the use of a 7-mm disposable cannula. The anterosuperior portal is used for instrumentation. An 18-gauge spinal needle is passed via the portal of Neviaser and the rotator cuff into arthroscopic view above the superior labrum. A No. 1 polydioxanone suture (PDS; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) is advanced through the spinal needle. An arthroscopic retriever or meniscal clamp is used to retrieve the free end of the suture and bring it out through a small anterior stab wound. A suture anchor is inserted via the anterosuperior portal into the superior neck of the glenoid. The more medial limb of the No. 2 Ethibond suture (Ethicon) from the suture anchor is retrieved with the inferior limb of the No. 1 PDS suture, and both are brought out through the anterosuperior cannula. The opposite end of the No. 1 PDS suture is then manually pulled, while, under direct arthroscopic visualization, the No. 2 Ethibond suture, now tied to the opposite end of the PDS, is pulled through the superior labral tissue. That anchor suture is retrieved and is placed outside the cannula that contains the other anchor suture. Standard arthroscopic knot tying is then employed.
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 05/2007; 23(4):439.e1-2. · 3.02 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In this study, we evaluated the results of arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder using knotless anchors and the lesions associated with anterior-inferior labrum avulsion.
Retrospective clinical study.
Twenty consecutive patients affected with anterior unidirectional post-traumatic shoulder instability were treated with arthroscopic reconstruction using knotless anchors. During the surgical procedure, associated lesions such as superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) (15%) and rotator interval (15%) were repaired. The patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 43 months.
Eighty percent of patients resumed sports activity without any limitation and 90% of patients were satisfied with the results of surgery. One patient (5%) had a recurrent dislocation; this patient resumed a contact sport activity despite medical advice. One patient (5%) related signs of shoulder insecurity at the extreme degree of abduction and external rotation; this patient had resumed sports activity with a moderate limitation and was the only patient who was not completely satisfied with the results of surgery. No significant difference was observed between the operated and the contralateral shoulder according to the Rowe and Constant scores. The mean loss of external rotation was 3 degrees . We did not have any cases of anchor loosening, nor did we find signs of shoulder degenerative osteoarthritis on the radiographs.
The knotless anchor seems to be a viable alternative for arthroscopic labrum repair, allowing a good capsular shift. Arthroscopic management of shoulder instability allows us to diagnose and treat associated lesions, thus improving the success rate of this type of surgery.
Level IV, case series.
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 12/2005; 21(11):1283-9. · 3.02 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A laparoscopic procedure is considered the treatment of choice for adrenalectomy. We report the experience of a nonreferring unit for adrenal pathology; we have evaluated its safety and feasibility in a series of 40 patients. From 1994 to 2001, forty consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy, 37 with transperitoneal and 3 with retroperitoneal approach. The mean operative time was 129 +/- 51.7 minutes (range 60-300): 107 +/- 29 minutes (range 60-100) for the right-sided transperitoneal adrenalectomy and 144 +/- 62 minutes (range 90-300) for the left-sided transperitoneal adrenalectomy. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 90 mL (range 40-200). The procedure laparoscopic was converted to open in one case for the presence of a voluminous angiolipoma arising from the retroperitoneal fat strictly adherent to the adrenal gland. The postoperative morbidity rate was 5.1 per cent. Pain medication was required for a mean period of 1.6 +/- 0.6 days (range 1-3). The patients were able to resume solid food after an average time of 1.8 +/- 0.7 days (range 1-4). Postoperative hospital stay was 3 +/- 1.4 days (range 2-8). We believe that laparoscopic adrenalectomy is safe and effective in removing benign functioning or nonfunctioning adrenal masses and also in a general surgery department.
The American surgeon 06/2003; 69(5):427-33. · 1.28 Impact Factor
-
The European Journal of Surgery 02/2002; 168(11):651-3.
