Are you Douglas Krupka?

Claim your profile

Publications (2)1.36 Total impact

  • Article: Determinants of historic and cultural landmark designation: why we preserve what we preserve
    Douglas James Krupka, Douglas S. Noonan, Douglas Krupka
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: I present a structural empirical model of collective household labour supply that includes the non-participation decision. I specify a simultaneous model for hours, participation and wages of husband and wife. I discuss the problems of identification and statistical coherency that arise in the application of the collective household labour supply model. The model includes random effects and it is estimated using a panel data set of Dutch couples. The estimates allow me to check the underlying regularity conditions on individual preferences and to obtain estimates of the sharing rule that governs the division of household income between husband and wife. Copyright © The Author(s). Journal compilation © Royal Economic Society 2009.
    Journal of Cultural Economics 01/2010; 34(1):1-26. · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • Article: Determinants of historic and cultural landmark designation: why we preserve what we preserve
    Douglas S. Noonan, Douglas Krupka
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is much interest among cultural economists in assessing the effects of heritage preservation policies. There has been less interest in modeling the policy choices made in historic and cultural landmark preservation. This paper builds an economic model of a landmark designation that highlights the tensions between the interests of owners of cultural amenities and the interests of the neighboring community. We perform empirical tests by estimating a discrete choice model for landmark preservation using data from Chicago, combining the Chicago Historical Resources Survey of over 17,000 historic structures with property sales, Census, and other geographic data. The data allow us to explain why some properties were designated landmarks (or landmark districts) and others were not. The results identify the influence of property characteristics, local socio-economic factors, and measures of historic and cultural quality. The results emphasize the political economy of implementing preservation policies.