David M Baguley

Cambridge University Hospitals , Cambridge, ENG, United Kingdom

Are you David M Baguley?

Claim your profile

Publications (3)1.44 Total impact

  • Source
    Article: A randomized, controlled study comparing the effects of vestipitant or vestipitant and paroxetine combination in subjects with tinnitus.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tinnitus is a common symptom that demonstrates a significant comorbidity with anxiety and depression. The novel neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, vestipitant, has anxiolytic properties and a good safety profile. Vestipitant was investigated for potential effect against chronic tinnitus as a stand-alone treatment and in conjunction with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine. Randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Tertiary neurotologic and audiologic center with additional referrals from a secondary university hospital center. Twenty-four adult patients with tinnitus were randomized into the study. Visual analogue scale (VAS) measurements of tinnitus loudness (intensity), pitch and distress, VAS measurements of arousal/anxiety, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, and plasma concentrations of trial drugs. No statistically significant treatment benefit effect was detected for tinnitus (intensity, pitch, and distress) VAS scores, arousal-anxiety VAS scores, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, or tinnitus aggravation scores assessed on Days 1 and 14. However, a statistically significant worsening of tinnitus intensity and distress scores was observed after vestipitant compared with placebo for the mean data collected over the treatment period. No relevant differences in vestipitant plasma concentrations were observed between the subjects given the combination with paroxetine and those receiving vestipitant alone. No specific relationships were observed between tinnitus intensity and vestipitant plasma concentrations. Although well-tolerated vestipitant, alone or in combination with paroxetine, was not effective in ameliorating tinnitus in this patient group.
    Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 06/2011; 32(5):721-7. · 1.44 Impact Factor
  • Chapter: Hyperacusis and Disorders of Loudness Perception
    David M. Baguley, Don J. McFerran
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1. There are several forms of loudness perception disorder. 2. The terminology of such disorders is often confused. 3. The most commonly used terms in an audiological context are hyperacusis, denoting a generalized reduced tolerance for sound, as well as phonophobia, denoting a fear of sounds. 4. The majority of people with a loudness perception disorder also have tinnitus. Just under one half of individuals with tinnitus also describe some degree of loudness perception disorder. 5. There are few rigorous studies regarding the epidemiology of loudness perception disorders; the true prevalence of hyperacuis and phonophobia remains a matter of conjecture. 6. Some loudness perception disorders are associated with disorders of facial nerve function with consequent loss of the acoustic reflex. Most cases have no such association and the underlying pathological mechanism is unclear. 7. Various management strategies have been suggested, including the use of tinnitus therapies, with or without the use of sound therapy, and psychological therapies. KeywordsTinnitus-Hyperacusis-Hypersensitivity-Loudness discomfort-Migraine
    12/2010: pages 13-23;
  • Article: Tinnitus: a review.
    Don J McFerran, David M Baguley
    The Practitioner 09/2004; 248(1661):556, 558, 563 passim.

Institutions

  • 2010
    • Cambridge University Hospitals
      Cambridge, ENG, United Kingdom
  • 2004
    • Essex County College
      Essex, MD, USA