Bruno Schnetzler

Publications (5)11.9 Total impact

• Article: Trypanosoma cruzi fatal reactivation in a heart transplant recipient in Switzerland.

  Yves Jackson, Thanh Dang, Bruno Schnetzler, Manuel Pascual, Pascal Meylan
  The Journal of heart and lung transplantation: the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation 01/2011; 30(4):484-5. · 3.54 Impact Factor
• Article: Cardiac transplantation in a patient with emotionally triggered implantable cardioverter defibrillator storms.

  Chirine Parsai, Robert F Bonvini, Bruno Schnetzler, Henri Sunthorn
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) may be responsible for psychological disorders especially among patients experiencing multiple shocks. An associated hyperadrenergic state (e.g., anger, anxiety) may trigger malignant ventricular arrhythmias repeatedly treated by ICD shocks, entertaining a "vicious circle" often difficult to interrupt. Despite aggressive cardiac and psychological therapeutic efforts, this condition may be refractory, finally leading to heart transplantation, as described in this case report.
  Heart and Vessels 10/2007; 22(5):349-51. · 2.05 Impact Factor
• Article: [Management of end-stage heart failure].

  Bruno Schnetzler, Stéphane Reverdin, Henri Sunthorn, Afksendiyos Kalangos, Ulrich Sigwart
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Non-medical approaches to end-stage heart failure (ESHF) include heart transplantation, but also implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy and ventricular assist devices. These techniques might be used as a bridge to transplant, as a bridge to recovery or as destination therapy. Optimal medical therapy of ESHF should include an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, a beta-blocker and spironolactone. Risk stratification in ESHF allows to determine the individual prognosis of each patient with parameters such as echocardiographic criteria, peak exercise oxygen consumption, or plasma BNP levels. Heart transplantation is to be considered if the individual prognosis obtained after stratification is worse than the expected survival of transplant recipients.
  Revue médicale suisse 05/2005; 1(17):1159-64.
• Article: Safety of low-dose spironolactone administration in chronic haemodialysis patients.

  Patrick Saudan, Francois Mach, Thomas Perneger, Bruno Schnetzler, Catherine Stoermann, Zina Fumeaux, Michel Rossier, Pierre-Yves Martin
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Prevention of cardiovascular diseases is essential in chronic haemodialysis patients. Recently, low-dose spironolactone has been shown to decrease cardiovascular mortality in patients with severe heart failure. However, since haemodialysis patients are prone to hyperkalaemia, a known side effect of spironolactone, this treatment is not used in this population. We performed a study to assess whether low-dose spironolactone (3 x 25 mg/week) could be administered without inducing hyperkalaemia in haemodialysis patients. The study design included a 2-week baseline period, followed by a 4-week treatment period in which doses of spironolactone were started at 12.5 mg three times/week for 2 weeks, then increased to 25 mg three times/week, and followed by a 2-week wash-out period. Fourteen patients receiving low-dose spironolactone after each dialysis were compared with 21 haemodialysis patients (control group). Low-dose spironolactone did not change mean serum potassium (4.9 +/- 0.7 vs 4.9 +/- 0.3 mmol/l: control). The mean plasma canrenone level induced by administration of spironolactone 25 mg three times/week in the 14 treated patients was 13 +/- 5.3 ng/ml. Serum aldosterone was not significantly modified by the administration of spironolactone in these patients [before, median 0.35; interquartile range (IQR) 0.11-2.83 nmol/l vs after, median 0.22; IQR 0.12-0.60 nmol/l, NS]. Dietary potassium intake and the use of ion-exchange resin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers were similar for the two groups throughout the study. This non-randomized and non-blinded study shows that administration of 25 mg spironolactone thrice weekly is not associated with an increased frequency of hyperkalaemia in haemodialysis patients when they are carefully monitored. More studies are required, however, before concluding that spironolactone administration is safe in the chronic haemodialysis population.
  Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 12/2003; 18(11):2359-63. · 3.40 Impact Factor
• Article: A prospective randomized controlled study on the efficacy and tolerance of two antilymphocytic globulins in the prevention of rejection in first-heart transplant recipients.

  Bruno Schnetzler, Philippe Leger, Andreas Völp, Richard Dorent, Alain Pavie, Iradj Gandjbakhch
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: The usefulness of induction phase treatment in heart transplantation is a long-standing debate in the literature. Several centers report good short-term survival without such treatment, but no randomized trial addresses this question. If induction treatment is to be used, most centers prefer rabbit polyclonal antisera to OKT3. However, again, no randomized trial has compared the relative efficacy and tolerance of rabbit antisera. Fifty first-heart transplant recipients with standard triple immunosuppression were randomized to receive ATG Fresenius ( n=24) or Thymoglobulin Mérieux ( n=26) as an induction treatment and were followed for 1 year. The two groups were well matched for gender, age, pre-transplant diagnosis and ischemia time. Actuarial survival at 1 year was 87.5% in the Fresenius group and 84.6% in the Mérieux group (Fisher's exact test; P=1). The average number of rejection episodes per patient was comparable in both treatment groups (Fresenius: mean=2.63, SD=1.44; Mérieux: mean=2.46, SD=2.04). Mean time to first rejection was 48.9+/-37.2 days in the Fresenius group versus 59.6+/-54 days in the Mérieux group (Mann-Witney U-test: z=0.77; P=NS). The total number of rejections across all patients was also comparable (Fresenius: 63; Mérieux: 64) as well as the severity of rejection (seven moderate rejections out of a total of 63 in the Fresenius group and eight out of 64 in the Mérieux group). Eighteen Fresenius (75%) and 15 Mérieux (58%) patients suffered from at least one infection ( P=NS). The tolerance to treatment was excellent in both groups. Total lymphocyte count and all subsets of tested lymphocytes decreased rapidly after the introduction of either antiserum but was more pronounced and persisted for longer in the Mérieux group. ATG Fresenius or Thymoglobulin Mérieux as induction treatments in first-heart transplant recipients treated with standard immunosuppression have the same relative efficacy with regard to survival, acute rejection or infection rate, and are well tolerated.
  Transplant International 07/2002; 15(6):317-25. · 2.92 Impact Factor