Mary Jo Wagner,
Stephen Wolf,
Susan Promes,
Doug McGee,
Cheri Hobgood,
Christopher Doty,
Mara Ann McErlean, Alan Janssen,
Rebecca Smith-Coggins,
Louis Ling,
Amal Mattu,
Stephen Tantama,
Michael Beeson,
Thomas Brabson,
Greg Christiansen,
Brent King,
Emily Luerssen,
Robert Muelleman
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Representatives of emergency medicine (EM) were asked to develop a consensus report that provided a review of the past and potential future effects of duty hour requirements for EM residency training. In addition to the restrictions made in 2003 by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), the potential effects of the 2008 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report on resident duty hours were postulated. The elements highlighted include patient safety, resident wellness, and the resident training experience. Many of the changes and recommendations did not affect EM as significantly as other specialties. Current training standards in EM have already emphasized patient safety by requiring continuous on-site supervision of residents. Resident fatigue has been addressed with restrictions of shift lengths and limitation of consecutive days worked. One recommendation from the IOM was a required 5-hour rest period for residents on call. Emergency department (ED) patient safety becomes an important concern with the decrease in the availability and in the patient load of a resident consultant that may result from this recommendation. Of greater concern is the already observed slower throughput time for admitted patients waiting for resident care, which will increase ED crowding and decrease patient safety in academic institutions. A balance between being overly prescriptive with duty hour restrictions and trying to improve resident wellness was recommended. Discussion is included regarding the appropriate length of EM training programs if clinical experiences were limited by new duty hour regulations. Finally, this report presents a review of the financing issues associated with any changes.
Academic Emergency Medicine 09/2010; 17(9):1004-11. · 1.86 Impact Factor
