Are you Aimee Patrick-Melin?

Claim your profile

Publications (2)9.15 Total impact

  • Article: Higher bone mineral density is associated with a decreased risk of colorectal adenomas.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bone mineral density (BMD) is a biomarker for cumulative exposure to multiple factors including estrogen, calcium, vitamin D and physical activity, which have all been independently associated with colorectal cancer. Furthermore, higher levels of BMD have been inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk, particularly in postmenopausal women. However, no prior studies have examined the potential association between BMD and colorectal adenomas, which are precursor lesions to most colorectal cancers. Therefore, we evaluated the association between BMD, which was measured using a whole body, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan and colorectal adenomas in 167 patients who underwent colonoscopy screening. We found that patients in the highest tertile of total body BMD (>1.294 g/cm(2)) and in the middle tertile (≥1.167 to ≤1.294 g/cm(2)) compared to those with a total body BMD in the lowest tertile (<1.167 g/cm(2)) had a lower risk of colorectal adenomas (highest vs. lowest tertile: OR = 0.29 (0.10-0.84); middle vs. lowest tertile: OR=0.26 (0.08-0.80); p-trend=0.02). Stratification by gender revealed that this association was more pronounced in women (highest (>1.280 g/cm(2)) vs. lowest (<1.130 g/cm(2)) tertile: OR=0.08 (0.01-0.70); middle (≥1.130 to ≤1.280 g/cm(2)) vs. lowest tertile: OR=0.15 (0.04-0.94); p-trend=0.02) even after excluding hormone replacement therapy users (highest (>1.295 g/cm(2)) and middle (≥1.132 to ≤1.295 g/cm(2)) vs. lowest (<1.132 g/cm(2)) tertile: OR=0.17 (0.03-0.97); p-trend=0.04). Our results show, for the first time, that BMD is inversely associated with colorectal adenomas, particularly in women. Although additional larger, prospective studies are needed, our results suggest that BMD may be a biomarker for colorectal cancer precursor lesions.
    International Journal of Cancer 08/2011; 129(4):956-64. · 5.44 Impact Factor
  • Article: A 7-d exercise program increases high-molecular weight adiponectin in obese adults.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: High-molecular weight (HMW) adiponectin is the biologically active form of adiponectin and is related to enhanced insulin sensitivity and metabolic function. Previously, we found that 7 d of exercise improves insulin sensitivity in obese subjects; however, whether short-term exercise training affects HMW adiponectin in obese persons is unknown. We examined the effect of seven consecutive days of supervised vigorous exercise (60 min · d(-1), 85% HRmax) on HMW adiponectin and leptin secretion in 17 obese individuals (age = 55 ± 3 yr; body mass index = 33.7 ± 0.9 kg · m(-2)). Insulin sensitivity was calculated from an oral glucose tolerance test (ISIOGTT) using the Matsuda Index. Fasting plasma HMW adiponectin and leptin were quantified from blood samples obtained before the ISIOGTT. Glucose and insulin measures were obtained before and every 30 min during the test. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry was used to determine body composition, and indirect calorimetry was used to assess fat oxidation. After the intervention, there was a significant increase in HMW adiponectin (3202 ± 543 vs 3878 ± 682 ng · mL(-1), P = 0.02) and a decrease in leptin (36.8 ± 5.1 vs 31.1 ± 4.2 μg · mL(-1), P = 0.03). Further, we observed an increase in ISIOGTT (1.7 ± 0.3 vs 2.1 ± 0.3, P = 0.04) and a decrease in glucose area under the curve (30,871 ± 2105 vs 28,469 ± 1657 mg · dL(-1) for 3 h, P = 0.01). The increase in HMW adiponectin was positively associated with the increase in basal fat oxidation (r = 0.57, P = 0.03), consistent with an improvement in adipose tissue metabolic function. The data suggest that 7 d of exercise is sufficient not only to improve insulin sensitivity and fat oxidation but also to favorably alter adipokine secretion, independent of changes in body weight or composition.
    Medicine and science in sports and exercise 06/2011; 44(1):69-74. · 3.71 Impact Factor