-
Sally A Amundson, Khanh T Do,
Lisa C Vinikoor,
R Anthony Lee,
Christine A Koch-Paiz,
Jaeyong Ahn,
Mark Reimers,
Yidong Chen,
Dominic A Scudiero,
John N Weinstein,
Jeffrey M Trent,
Michael L Bittner,
Paul S Meltzer,
Albert J Fornace
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The 60 cell lines of the National Cancer Institute Anticancer Drug Screen (NCI-60) constitute the most extensively characterized in vitro cancer cell model. They have been tested for sensitivity to more than 100,000 potential chemotherapy agents and have been profiled extensively at the DNA, RNA, protein, functional, and pharmacologic levels. We have used the NCI-60 cell lines and three additional lines to develop a database of responses of cancer cells to ionizing radiation. We compared clonogenic survival, apoptosis, and gene expression response by microarray. Although several studies have profiled relative basal gene expression in the NCI-60, this is the first comparison of large-scale gene expression changes in response to genotoxic stress. Twenty-two genes were differentially regulated in cells with low survival after 2-Gy gamma-rays; 14 genes identified lines more sensitive to 8 Gy. Unlike reported basal gene expression patterns, changes in expression in response to radiation showed little tissue-of-origin effect, except for differentiating the lymphoblastoid cell lines from other cell types. Basal expression patterns, however, discriminated well between radiosensitive and more resistant lines, possibly being more informative than radiation response signatures. The most striking patterns in the radiation data were a set of genes up-regulated preferentially in the p53 wild-type lines and a set of cell cycle regulatory genes down-regulated across the entire NCI-60 panel. The response of those genes to gamma-rays seems to be unaffected by the myriad of genetic differences across this diverse cell set; it represents the most penetrant gene expression response to ionizing radiation yet observed.
Cancer Research 02/2008; 68(2):415-24. · 7.86 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Gene expression responses of human cell lines exposed to a diverse set of stress agents were compared by cDNA microarray hybridization. The B-lymphoblastoid cell line TK6 (p53 wild-type) and its p53-null derivative, NH32, were treated in parallel to facilitate investigation of p53-dependent responses. RNA was extracted 4 h after the beginning of treatment when no notable decrease in cell viability was evident in the cultures. Gene expression signatures were defined that discriminated between four broad general mechanisms of stress agents: Non-DNA-damaging stresses (heat shock, osmotic shock, and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate), agents causing mainly oxidative stress (arsenite and hydrogen peroxide), ionizing radiations (neutron and gamma-ray exposures), and other DNA-damaging agents (ultraviolet radiation, methyl methanesulfonate, adriamycin, camptothecin, and cis-Platinum(II)diammine dichloride (cisplatin)). Within this data set, non-DNA-damaging stresses could be discriminated from all DNA-damaging stresses, and profiles for individual agents were also defined. While DNA-damaging stresses showed a strong p53-dependent element in their responses, no discernible p53-dependent responses were triggered by the non-DNA-damaging stresses. A set of 16 genes did exhibit a robust p53-dependent pattern of induction in response to all nine DNA-damaging agents, however.
Oncogene 07/2005; 24(28):4572-9. · 6.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Using a human myeloid tumor cell line (ML-1), we detected induction of mRNA expression of several stress-responsive genes by doses of gamma rays as low as 2 cGy. For instance, the dose response for induction of CIP1/WAF1 and GADD45 appears to be linear over the range of 2 to 50 cGy and shows no evidence of a threshold for induction. Although 2 and 5 cGy exposures did not result in any detectable reduction in cloning efficiency nor in increased apoptosis in ML-1 cells, these exposures did produce a brief cell-cycle delay. We also used fluorescent cDNA microarray hybridization to investigate transcriptional stress responses following low doses of gamma rays and to identify additional radiation-responsive genes for inclusion in a stress-specific microarray we are developing. These studies provide insight into the molecular responses to physiologically relevant doses, which cannot necessarily be extrapolated from high-dose studies. The use of high throughput arrays will allow the identification of multiple stress-responsive genes that are radiation inducible in a variety of cell types and tissues. The expectation is that transcriptional stress responses will provide a molecular approach to monitoring for radiation exposure and detecting interindividual differences.
Military medicine 03/2002; 167(2 Suppl):13-5. · 0.92 Impact Factor
