-
Peter C Dubsky,
Raimund Jakesz, Brigitte Mlineritsch,
Sabine Pöstlberger,
Hellmut Samonigg,
Werner Kwasny,
Christoph Tausch,
Herbert Stöger,
Karin Haider,
Florian Fitzal, [......],
Michael Stierer,
Paul Sevelda,
Gero Luschin-Ebengreuth,
Susanne Taucher,
Margaretha Rudas,
Rupert Bartsch,
Günther G Steger,
Richard Greil,
Lidija Filipcic,
Michael Gnant
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Anastrozole (ANA) alone delivers significant disease-free survival benefits over tamoxifen (TAM) monotherapy in postmenopausal women with early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. The ABCSG-8 (Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group 8) study is a large phase III clinical trial addressing the sequence strategy containing ANA in comparison with 5 years of TAM in a low- to intermediate-risk group of postmenopausal patients.
Endocrine receptor-positive patients with G1 or G2 tumors were eligible. After surgery, patients were randomly assigned to 5 years of TAM or 2 years of TAM followed by 3 years of ANA. Adjuvant chemotherapy and G3 and T4 tumors were exclusion criteria. Intention-to-treat and censored analyses of on-treatment recurrence-free survival (RFS) were performed, and exploratory survival end points and toxicity were investigated.
Information from 3,714 patients, including 17,563 woman-years, with a median of 60 months of follow-up was available for this analysis. Median age was 63.8 years, 75% were node negative, and 75% had T1 tumors. Sequencing of ANA after identical 2-year treatment with TAM in both arms did not result in a statistically significant improvement of RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.01; P = .06). Exploratory analyses of distant relapse-free survival indicated a 22% improvement (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.00). On-treatment adverse events and serious adverse events were consistent with known toxicity profiles of ANA and TAM treatment.
Despite a low overall rate of recurrence in a population with breast cancer at limited risk of relapse, the a priori sequence strategy of 2 years of TAM followed by 3 years of ANA led to small outcome and toxicity benefits.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 03/2012; 30(7):722-8. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In advanced breast cancer, multiple sequential lines of treatments are frequently applied. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has a favourable toxicity profile and can be used in first or higher lines of therapy. PLD has demonstrated response activity even after prior anthracycline exposure.
129 consecutive patients with advanced breast cancer, of whom the majority had been massively pretreated, received PLD as monotherapy within licensed approval, for which efficacy and toxicities were documented.
In a routine therapy setting, PLD was administered in a slightly reduced dose (median, 40 mg/m2 per cycle). Response rate (complete and partial remission) was 26%, and stable disease was observed in 19% of patients. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.8 months and 14.2 months, respectively. There was no difference in terms of response and PFS, no matter if patients had already received anthracycline treatment. Interestingly, PFS proved similar regardless whether PLD was administered as palliative therapy in first, second or third line. Furthermore, PFS and OS were similar in patients with response or stable disease, underscoring the view that disease stabilization is associated with a profound clinical benefit. The most common side effects reported were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (17%), exanthema (14%) and mucositis (12%).
Efficacy and toxicity data in these "real life" patients permit the conclusion that PLD is a valuable option in the treatment of advanced breast cancer even in heavily pretreated patients.
BMC Cancer 08/2011; 11:373. · 3.01 Impact Factor
-
Michael Gnant, Brigitte Mlineritsch,
Herbert Stoeger,
Gero Luschin-Ebengreuth,
Dietmar Heck,
Christian Menzel,
Raimund Jakesz,
Michael Seifert,
Michael Hubalek,
Gunda Pristauz,
Thomas Bauernhofer,
Holger Eidtmann,
Wolfgang Eiermann,
Guenther Steger,
Werner Kwasny,
Peter Dubsky,
Gerhard Hochreiner,
Ernst-Pius Forsthuber,
Christian Fesl,
Richard Greil
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Analysis of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group trial-12 (ABCSG-12) at 48 months' follow-up showed that addition of zoledronic acid to adjuvant endocrine therapy significantly improved disease-free survival. We have now assessed long-term clinical efficacy including disease-free survival and disease outcomes in patients receiving anastrozole or tamoxifen with or without zoledronic acid.
ABSCG-12 is a randomised, controlled, open-label, two-by-two factorial, multicentre trial in 1803 premenopausal women with endocrine-receptor-positive early-stage (stage I-II) breast cancer receiving goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days), comparing the efficacy and safety of anastrozole (1 mg per day) or tamoxifen (20 mg per day) with or without zoledronic acid (4 mg every 6 months) for 3 years. Randomisation (1:1:1:1 ratio) was computerised and based on the Pocock and Simon minimisation method to balance the four treatment arms across eight prognostic variables (age, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathological tumour stage; lymph-node involvement, type of surgery or locoregional therapy, complete axillary dissection, intraoperative radiation therapy, and geographical region). Treatment allocation was not masked. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (defined as disease recurrence or death) and analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00295646; follow-up is ongoing.
At a median follow-up of 62 months (range 0-114.4 months), more than 2 years after treatment completion, 186 disease-free survival events had been reported (53 events in 450 patients on tamoxifen alone, 57 in 453 patients on anastrozole alone, 36 in 450 patients on tamoxifen plus zoledronic acid, and 40 in 450 patients on anastrozole plus zoledronic acid). Zoledronic acid reduced risk of disease-free survival events overall (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.91; p=0.009), although the difference was not significant in the tamoxifen (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.44-1.03; p=0.067) and anastrozole arms (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.45-1.02; p=0.061) assessed separately. Zoledronic acid did not significantly affect risk of death (30 deaths with zoledronic acid vs 43 deaths without; HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.41-1.07; p=0.09). There was no difference in disease-free survival between patients on tamoxifen alone versus anastrozole alone (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.81-1.44; p=0.591), but overall survival was worse with anastrozole than with tamoxifen (46 vs 27 deaths; HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.08-2.83; p=0.02). Treatments were generally well tolerated, with no reports of renal failure or osteonecrosis of the jaw. Bone pain was reported in 601 patients (33%; 349 patients on zoledronic acid vs 252 not on the drug), fatigue in 361 (20%; 192 vs 169), headache in 280 (16%; 147 vs 133), and arthralgia in 266 (15%; 145 vs 121).
Addition of zoledronic acid improved disease-free survival in the patients taking anastrozole or tamoxifen. There was no difference in disease-free survival between patients receiving anastrozole and tamoxifen overall, but those on anastrozole alone had inferior overall survival. These data show persistent benefits with zoledronic acid and support its addition to adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer.
AstraZeneca; Novartis.
The lancet oncology 07/2011; 12(7):631-41. · 14.47 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Temsirolimus inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin with demonstrated efficacy in patients with advanced renal cell cancer.
We present a retrospective analysis of our single-center experience with temsirolimus in patients pretreated with sunitinib, sorafenib or everolimus. Sixteen patients were treated within our center starting in December 2006 until September 2009. The majority of patients (14 of 16) had received a prior antiangiogenic pretreatment. We further analyzed the efficacy of subsequent treatment with temsirolimus in these patients.
Stable disease could be achieved in 8 of 14 pretreated patients (57%). The duration of median progression-free survival was 10 weeks (range 1-43). Especially patients with a good response to previous antiangiogenic treatment, a good overall condition and a low Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) score benefited from subsequent treatment with temsirolimus. We did not see any complete or partial response meeting the World Health Organization criteria. Temsirolimus was well tolerated.
Temsirolimus appears to be an effective and well-tolerated substance in the treatment of patients with a good performance status, low MSKCC score and stable disease under previous antiangiogenic treatment in advanced renal cell cancer. However, its use is highly questionable in pretreated patients with a poor performance score and a high MSKCC score.
Oncology 05/2011; 80(1-2):34-41. · 2.27 Impact Factor
-
Georg Pfeiler,
Robert Königsberg,
Christian Fesl, Brigitte Mlineritsch,
Herbert Stoeger,
Christian F Singer,
Sabine Pöstlberger,
Guenther G Steger,
Michael Seifert,
Peter Dubsky,
Susanne Taucher,
Hellmut Samonigg,
Vesna Bjelic-Radisic,
Richard Greil,
Christian Marth,
Michael Gnant
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Aromatase inhibitors are effective as endocrine treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. According to the hypothesis that overweight patients have higher levels of aromatase enzyme availability, we investigated the influence of body mass index (BMI) on the efficacy of adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients in a retrospective analysis of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) 12 trial.
ABCSG-12 examined the efficacy of ovarian suppression using goserelin (3.6 mg subcutaneously every 28 days) in combination with anastrozole or tamoxifen with or without zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously every 6 months) in premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer. BMI was calculated using the prospectively collected data on patients' height and weight at study entry. BMI categories have been differentiated according to the WHO definition.
Overweight patients treated with anastrozole had a 60% increase in the risk of disease recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.41; P = .02) and more than a doubling in the risk of death (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.17 to 3.92; P = .01) compared with normal weight patients treated with anastrozole. In the overweight group, patients treated with anastrozole had a nearly 50% increase in the risk of disease recurrence (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.93 to 2.38; P = .08) and a three-fold increase in the risk of death (HR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.35 to 6.82; P = .004) compared with patients treated with tamoxifen.
BMI significantly impacts on the efficacy of anastrozole plus goserelin in premenopausal patients with breast cancer, probably through influencing aromatase availability and/or ovarian suppression by goserelin.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 05/2011; 29(19):2653-9. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Zoledronic acid, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, is firmly established in the management of metastatic bone disease. It inhibits farnesyl diphosphonate synthase within the mevalonate pathway and, through this mechanism, is a potent inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. In addition, there are preclinical data suggesting that farnesyl diphosphonate synthase inhibition by zoledronic acid has anti-tumor effects in breast cancer. Adjuvant therapies for early breast cancer are associated with substantial decreases in bone mineral density. Results from three clinical trials, ABCSG-12, Z-FAST and ZO-FAST, indicate that the addition of twice-yearly zoledronic acid to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer prevents cancer treatment-induced bone loss. Moreover, it is becoming evident that it may also exert anticancer effects in an estrogen-deprived state in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. However, long-term side effects need to be taken into consideration for treatment decisions.
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 03/2011; 11(3):333-49. · 2.65 Impact Factor
-
Rupert Bartsch, Brigitte Mlineritsch,
Michael Gnant,
Thomas Niernberger,
Ursula Pluschnig,
Richard Greil,
Catharina Wenzel,
Paul Sevelda,
Josef Thaler,
Margaretha Rudas,
Michael Pober,
Christoph C Zielinski,
Guenther G Steger
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Endocrine therapy is the preferred treatment in oestrogen- and/or progesterone-receptor (ER/PgR) positive breast cancer. Fulvestrant is a pure ER-antagonist. We present results from the Austrian Fulvestrant Registry.
Three-hundred and fifty patients were included. Time to progression (TTP) was defined as primary endpoint. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors significantly associated with TTP.
Fulvestrant was administered as first-line therapy in 26%, second-line in 49%, and third-line or beyond in 25%. TTP was median 7 months. We observed a response in 15% of patients and 41% had SD > or = 6 months. First-line treatment and non-visceral metastases were associated with longer TTP. One case of pulmonary embolism was reported. Grade 3 toxicities consisted of joint pain (1.4%), nausea (1.4%) and hot flashes (0.3%).
Fulvestrant was effective and well tolerated. TTP was superior to other trials, due to the large proportion of first-line patients. Activity is apparently independent of Her2-status.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 05/2009; 115(2):373-80. · 4.43 Impact Factor
-
Michael Gnant, Brigitte Mlineritsch,
Walter Schippinger,
Gero Luschin-Ebengreuth,
Sabine Pöstlberger,
Christian Menzel,
Raimund Jakesz,
Michael Seifert,
Michael Hubalek,
Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, [......],
Holger Eidtmann,
Günther Steger,
Werner Kwasny,
Peter Dubsky,
Michael Fridrik,
Florian Fitzal,
Michael Stierer,
Ernst Rücklinger,
Richard Greil,
C Marth
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Ovarian suppression plus tamoxifen is a standard adjuvant treatment in premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors are superior to tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients, and preclinical data suggest that zoledronic acid has antitumor properties.
We examined the effect of adding zoledronic acid to a combination of either goserelin and tamoxifen or goserelin and anastrozole in premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer. We randomly assigned 1803 patients to receive goserelin (3.6 mg given subcutaneously every 28 days) plus tamoxifen (20 mg per day given orally) or anastrozole (1 mg per day given orally) with or without zoledronic acid (4 mg given intravenously every 6 months) for 3 years. The primary end point was disease-free survival; recurrence-free survival and overall survival were secondary end points.
After a median follow-up of 47.8 months, 137 events had occurred, with disease-free survival rates of 92.8% in the tamoxifen group, 92.0% in the anastrozole group, 90.8% in the group that received endocrine therapy alone, and 94.0% in the group that received endocrine therapy with zoledronic acid. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival between the anastrozole and tamoxifen groups (hazard ratio for disease progression in the anastrozole group, 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 1.53; P=0.59). The addition of zoledronic acid to endocrine therapy, as compared with endocrine therapy without zoledronic acid, resulted in an absolute reduction of 3.2 percentage points and a relative reduction of 36% in the risk of disease progression (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.91; P=0.01); the addition of zoledronic acid did not significantly reduce the risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.32 to 1.11; P=0.11). Adverse events were consistent with known drug-safety profiles.
The addition of zoledronic acid to adjuvant endocrine therapy improves disease-free survival in premenopausal patients with estrogen-responsive early breast cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00295646.)
New England Journal of Medicine 03/2009; 360(7):679-91. · 53.30 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This multicenter phase II trial was conducted to analyze the clinical activity and toxicity of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and vinorelbine as first-line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer.
From August 2002 to August 2004, 42 patients with metastatic breast cancer were recruited for treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) on day 1 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks.
The median age of the patients in this trial was 68 years (range 60-82). 40% of patients had 2 or more sites of metastasis, 33 (78%) had predominantly visceral metastasis, and 7 (16%) mostly bone metastasis. Just 2 (5%) patients had only lymphogenous or soft tissue metastasis. All patients had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, but 70% of the patients had relevant comorbidities. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall clinical response rate was 36%, the complete response rate was 2%, and the rate of partial remissions was 34%; stable disease occurred in 30%, and progressive disease was observed in 36%. Median duration of response was 10 months. Median time to progression was 4 months, and median overall survival time was 24 months.
The combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and vinorelbine is an active and well tolerated regimen in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer in first-line treatment.
Onkologie 03/2009; 32(1-2):18-24. · 0.87 Impact Factor
-
Brigitte Mlineritsch
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Breast cancer remains the most prevalent cancer diagnosed in women worldwide. The number of effective treatments for breast cancer is on the rise, however, the benefit from specific treatments to individual patients and the adverse events experienced vary considerably. Efficacy and safety of anticancer therapies may depend on tumor, treatment, and host characteristics. Advances in the adjuvant chemotherapy of operable breast cancer have come from the introduction of effective agents and the application of the principles of combination chemotherapy. Attempts to advance these principles by substantial escalation of drug dosage have proven unsuccessful with a potentially higher rate of side effects. Another concept to increase efficacy is dose density, the administration of drugs with shortened intertreatment interval, and sequential therapy. The dose-dense concept improved clinical outcome significantly and was not accompanied by an increase in toxicity.
Breast Care 01/2009; 4(3):162-165. · 0.45 Impact Factor
-
Michael Gnant, Brigitte Mlineritsch,
Gero Luschin-Ebengreuth,
Franz Kainberger,
Helmut Kässmann,
Jutta Claudia Piswanger-Sölkner,
Michael Seifert,
Ferdinand Ploner,
Christian Menzel,
Peter Dubsky,
Florian Fitzal,
Vesna Bjelic-Radisic,
Günther Steger,
Richard Greil,
Christian Marth,
Ernst Kubista,
Hellmut Samonigg,
Peter Wohlmuth,
Martina Mittlböck,
Raimund Jakesz
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group trial-12 (ABCSG-12) bone substudy assesses zoledronic acid for preventing bone loss associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy and reports on long-term findings of bone-mineral density (BMD) during 3 years of treatment and 2 years after completing adjuvant treatment with or without zoledronic acid. The aim of this substudy is to gain insight into bone health in this setting.
ABCSG-12 is a randomised, open-label, phase III, 4-arm trial comparing tamoxifen (20 mg/day orally) and goserelin (3.6 mg subcutaneously every 28 days) versus anastrozole (1 mg/day orally) and goserelin (3.6 mg subcutaneously every 28 days), both with or without zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously every 6 months) for 3 years in premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer. This prospective bone subprotocol measured BMD at 0, 6, 12, 36, and 60 months. The primary endpoint of the bone substudy (secondary endpoint in the main trial) was change in BMD at 12 months, assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in assessable patients. Analyses were intention to treat. Statistical significance was assessed by t tests. The ABCSG-12 trial is registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov website, number NCT00295646.
404 patients were prospectively included in the bone substudy and randomly assigned to endocrine therapy alone (goserelin and anastrozole or goserelin and tamoxifen; n=199) or endocrine therapy concurrent with zoledronic acid (goserelin, anastrozole, and zoledronic acid or goserelin, tamoxifen, and zoledronic acid; n=205). After 3 years of treatment, endocrine therapy alone caused significant loss of BMD at the lumbar spine (-11.3%, mean difference -0.119 g/cm(2) [95% CI -0.146 to -0.091], p<0.0001) and trochanter (-7.3%, mean difference -0.053 g/cm(2) [-0.076 to -0.030], p<0.0001). In patients who did not receive zoledronic acid, anastrozole caused greater BMD loss than tamoxifen at 36 months at the lumbar spine (-13.6%, mean difference -0.141 g/cm(2) [-0.179 to -0.102] vs -9.0%, mean difference -0.095 g/cm(2) [-0.134 to -0.057], p<0.0001 for both). 2 years after the completion of treatment (median follow-up 60 months [range 15.5-96.6]), patients not receiving zoledronic acid still had decreased BMD at both sites compared with baseline (lumbar spine -6.3%, mean difference -0.067 g/cm(2) [-0.106 to -0.027], p=0.001; trochanter -4.1%, mean difference -0.03 g/cm(2) [-0.062 to 0.001], p=0.058). Patients who received zoledronic acid had stable BMD at 36 months (lumbar spine +0.4%, mean difference 0.004 g/cm(2) [-0.024 to 0.032]; trochanter +0.8%, mean difference 0.006 g/cm(2) [-0.018 to 0.028]) and increased BMD at 60 months at both sites (lumbar spine +4.0%, mean difference 0.039 g/cm(2) [0.005-0.075], p=0.02; trochanter +3.9%, mean difference 0.028 g/cm(2) [0.003-0.058], p=0.07) compared with baseline.
Goserelin plus tamoxifen or anastrozole for 3 years without concomitant zoledronic acid caused significant bone loss. Although there was partial recovery 2 years after completing treatment, patients receiving endocrine therapy alone did not recover their baseline BMD levels. Concomitant zoledronic acid prevented bone loss during therapy and improved BMD at 5 years.
The lancet oncology 10/2008; 9(9):840-9. · 14.47 Impact Factor
-
Peter Dubsky,
Paul Sevelda,
Raimund Jakesz,
Hubert Hausmaninger,
Hellmut Samonigg,
Michael Seifert,
Ursula Denison, Brigitte Mlineritsch,
Günther Steger,
Werner Kwasny,
Herbert Stöger,
Rupert Bartsch,
Michael Stierer,
Susanne Taucher,
Michael Fridrik,
Walter Schippinger,
Richard Greil,
Richard Pötter,
Michael Gnant
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To determine the effects of anemia on local relapse-free, relapse-free, and overall survival (LRFS, RFS, and OS, respectively) in premenopausal, primary breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant polychemotherapy, and to determine which conventional prognostic factors affected these outcomes.
Four hundred twenty-four premenopausal patients with early-stage primary breast cancer and hormone receptor-expressing tumors were treated with i.v. cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF) polychemotherapy as part of an adjuvant phase III trial (Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 5). The influence of anemia (hemoglobin <12 g/dL) on LRFS, RFS, and OS was evaluated in a retrospective analysis.
Of 424 patients, 77 (18.2%) developed anemia on CMF chemotherapy. After a median follow-up time of 5 years, 8.9% of nonanemic patients had local relapse compared with 19.6% of anemic patients (P=0.0006). Although mastectomy was associated with anemia (26% versus 13.7% in breast conserving surgery; P=0.002), multivariate analysis did not show mastectomy per se to be a significant risk factor for LRFS. Age, lymph node status, and hemoglobin had an independent significant influence on LRFS (P<0.005). Anemic patients had a relative risk of 2.96 (95% confidence interval, 1.41-6.23) for developing local relapse in comparison with nonanemic patients.
Premenopausal breast cancer patients who developed anemia during the CMF regimen had significantly worse LRFS. In Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 5, anemia may have contributed to an almost doubled incidence of local recurrence in the chemotherapy arm. Molecular targets associated with tumor hypoxia and distinct from erythropoiesis should receive further attention in experimental and clinical settings.
Clinical Cancer Research 05/2008; 14(7):2082-7. · 7.74 Impact Factor
-
Brigitte Mlineritsch,
Christoph Tausch,
Christian Singer,
Gero Luschin-Ebengreuth,
Raimund Jakesz,
Ferdinand Ploner,
Michael Stierer,
Elisabeth Melbinger,
Christian Menzel,
Andrea Urbania,
Michael Fridrik,
Günther Steger,
Peter Wohlmuth,
Michael Gnant,
Richard Greil
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A multicenter phase II study was conducted to analyze the clinical activity of the steroidal aromatase inhibitor exemestane in the neoadjuvant treatment of post-menopausal women with strongly ER- and/or PgR- positive operable breast cancer.
From September 2000 to December 2003, 80 women were recruited for treatment with exemestane 25 mg once daily for 4 months. The primary end-point was the clinical response rate according the WHO criteria; the secondary end-points included toxicity and the number of patients who qualified for breast conserving surgery at the end of treatment, comparability of evaluation methods for response, potential alterations of hormone receptor and Her2/neu status during treatment.
On an intention to evaluate analysis, according to the prespecified criteria the overall clinical objective response rate was 34%, the pCR rate was 3% and the rate of breast conserving surgery was 76%. When sonographic and mammographic longitudinal measurements were included in patients with missing palpation data, response rates were 38% and 41%, respectively. The tumor response was independent of the Her2/neu status which remained unchanged during treatment. In contrast, while the ER expression remained unaltered, downregulation of the PgR was observed. The treatment was well tolerated with no grade 3 and 4 toxicities except gastrointestinal (one grade 3 case) and hot flushes (two grade 3 cases).
This study shows that exemestane is effective and safe as a preoperative therapy in post-menopausal patients with strongly hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 01/2008; 112(1):203-13. · 4.43 Impact Factor
-
Raimund Jakesz,
Richard Greil,
Michael Gnant,
Marianne Schmid,
Werner Kwasny,
Ernst Kubista, Brigitte Mlineritsch,
Christoph Tausch,
Michael Stierer,
Friedrich Hofbauer,
Karl Renner,
Christian Dadak,
Ernst Rücklinger,
Hellmut Samonigg
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Clinical trial data have shown that among breast cancer patients who were disease free after 5 years of adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen, further extended treatment with the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole reduces breast cancer recurrence. We examined the efficacy and tolerability of extended adjuvant therapy with another aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, for 3 years among women who had completed 5 years of adjuvant therapy.
Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) Trial 6a is an extension of ABCSG Trial 6, in which hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal patients received 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, with or without the aromatase inhibitor aminoglutethimide, for the first 2 years of therapy. For ABCSG Trial 6a, patients who were disease free at the end of Trial 6 were randomly assigned to receive either 3 years of anastrozole or no further treatment. Efficacy data were analyzed with the use of a Cox proportional hazards regression model with two-sided P values and Kaplan-Meier curves, and tolerability data were estimated using logistic regression analysis with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
ABCSG Trial 6a included 856 patients. At a median follow-up of 62.3 months, women who received anastrozole (n = 387) had a statistically significantly reduced risk of recurrence (locoregional recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, or distant metastasis) compared with women who received no further treatment (n = 469; hazard ratio = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.40 to 0.96, P = .031). Anastrozole was well tolerated, and no unexpected adverse events were reported.
These data confirm the benefit of extending adjuvant tamoxifen therapy beyond 5 years with anastrozole compared with no further treatment. Further research is required to define the optimum length of extended adjuvant therapy and to investigate the possibility of tailoring this period to suit different disease types.
CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment 01/2008; 99(24):1845-53. · 14.07 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Fulvestrant (Faslodex) is an oestrogen receptor (ER) antagonist with demonstrated efficacy in patients with advanced and pretreated breast cancer.
We present a single-centre experience with fulvestrant administered under the compassionate use programme (CUP) to a total of 54 postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer progressing on multiple endocrine and cytotoxic therapies. Patients received 250 mg fulvestrant i.m. once monthly as second- (n = 8), third- (n = 30), fourth- (n = 14) and fifth-line (n = 2) hormonal treatment. The median number of previous endocrine therapies was 2 (range 1-4). Most of the patients also had multiple palliative chemotherapies with a median of 1.7 (range 0-6) prior therapies. The median duration of fulvestrant treatment was 6.3 months (range 1-39 months) and the median duration of follow-up was 19.4 months (range 1-63 months).
Objective response was achieved by five patients (9.3%): one complete remission (CR) (1.9%) and four partial remissions (PR) (7.4%). Stable disease (SD) lasting > or =6 months was achieved by 16 patients (29.6%). Thus in all, fulvestrant conferred clinical benefit (CB) on 21 women (38.9%). The median time to progression (TTP) was 6.4 months. In all patients with CR and PR, tumour cells were positive for both ER and progesterone receptor (PgR), but lacked HER2/neu overexpression; one patient with PR had an unknown HER2/neu status. Overall, the drug was well tolerated. No grade 3/4 toxicities were reported.
Fulvestrant appears to be an efficient and well-tolerated drug even in women with advanced breast cancer progressing after multiple endocrine and/or cytotoxic treatments.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 12/2007; 106(1):105-12. · 4.43 Impact Factor
-
Günther G Steger,
Arik Galid,
Michael Gnant, Brigitte Mlineritsch,
Alois Lang,
Christoph Tausch,
Margaretha Rudas,
Richard Greil,
Catharina Wenzel,
Christian F Singer,
Anton Haid,
Sabine Pöstlberger,
Hellmut Samonigg,
Gero Luschin-Ebengreuth,
Werner Kwasny,
Eduard Klug,
Ernst Kubista,
Christian Menzel,
Raimund Jakesz
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy for operable breast cancer downstages tumors initially not suitable for breast-conserving surgery. A pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be a surrogate for longer overall survival, but this beneficial effect remains to be established. This phase III trial evaluated whether doubling the number of cycles of neoadjuvant treatment increased the pCR rate.
Patients with biopsy-proven breast cancer (T1-4a-c, N+/-, M0; stage I to III) were eligible and randomly assigned to either three or six cycles of epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on days 3 through 10 (ED+G), every 21 days. The primary end point was the pCR rate of the breast tumor. Secondary end points were pathologic nodal status after surgery and the rate of breast-conserving surgery.
A total of 292 patients were accrued, and 288 patients were assessable for efficacy and safety. Groups were well balanced for known prognostic factors. Six cycles of ED+G, compared with three cycles, resulted in a significantly higher pCR rate (18.6% v 7.7%, respectively; P = .0045), a higher percentage of patients with negative axillary status (56.6% v 42.8%, respectively; P = .02), and a trend towards more breast-conserving surgery (75.9% v 66.9%, respectively; P = .10). Rates of adverse events were similar, and no patients died on treatment.
Doubling the number of neoadjuvant ED+G cycles from three to six results in higher rates of pCR and negative axillary nodal status with no excess of adverse effects. Thus, six cycles of ED+G should be the standard neoadjuvant treatment for operable breast cancer if this combination is chosen.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 06/2007; 25(15):2012-8. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
Michael F X Gnant, Brigitte Mlineritsch,
Gero Luschin-Ebengreuth,
Stephan Grampp,
Helmut Kaessmann,
Marianne Schmid,
Christian Menzel,
Jutta Claudia Piswanger-Soelkner,
Arik Galid,
Martina Mittlboeck,
Hubert Hausmaninger,
Raimund Jakesz
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer can be associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD) that may lead to skeletal morbidity. This study examined whether zoledronic acid can prevent bone loss associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients.
This study is a randomized, open-label, phase III, four-arm trial comparing tamoxifen (20 mg/d orally) and goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days subcutaneously) +/- zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously every 6 months) versus anastrozole (1 mg/d orally) and goserelin +/- zoledronic acid for 3 years in premenopausal women with hormone-responsive breast cancer. In a BMD subprotocol at three trial centers, patients underwent serial BMD measurements at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.
Four hundred one patients were included in the BMD subprotocol. Endocrine treatment without zoledronic acid led to significant (P < .001) overall bone loss after 3 years of treatment (BMD, -14.4% after 36 months; mean T score reduction, -1.4). Overall bone loss was significantly more severe in patients receiving anastrozole/goserelin (BMD, -17.3%; mean T score reduction, -2.6) compared with patients receiving tamoxifen/goserelin (BMD, -11.6%; mean T score reduction, -1.1). In contrast, BMD remained stable in zoledronic acid-treated patients (P < .0001 compared with endocrine therapy alone). No interactions with age or other risk factors were noted.
Endocrine therapy caused significant bone loss that increased with treatment duration in premenopausal women with breast cancer. Zoledronic acid 4 mg every 6 months effectively inhibited bone loss. Regular BMD measurements and initiation of concomitant bisphosphonate therapy on evidence of bone loss should be considered for patients undergoing endocrine therapy.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 03/2007; 25(7):820-8. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
Susanne Taucher,
Andreas Salat,
Michael Gnant,
Werner Kwasny, Brigitte Mlineritsch,
Rainer-Christian Menzel,
Marianne Schmid,
Michael G Smola,
Michael Stierer,
Christoph Tausch,
Arik Galid,
Günther Steger,
Raimund Jakesz
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Platelet count has been reported to have predictive value in various cancer entities. In the case of breast cancer, evidence about involvement of platelets is still incomplete. Our objective was to assess the influence of pretreatment thrombocytosis on survival and establish its prognostic relevance for breast cancer patients. We performed a retrospective, multivariate analysis of 4,300 patients with early-stage breast cancer. All subjects participated in one of five prospective, randomized, multicenter trials conducted by the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Thrombocytosis was defined as a platelet count exceeding 400 G/L. Median follow-up was 52 months. Univariate and multiple Cox regression models were calculated for overall survival (OS), breast cancer-related survival and disease-free survival (DFS). Pretreatment thrombocytosis was observed in 161 patients (3.7%). Estimated median OS, breast cancer-related survival and DFS for patients with versus those without thrombocytosis was 71.0 versus 99.5, 72.0 versus 100.9, and 80.4 versus 88.4 months, respectively (p = 0.0054, p = 0.0095, p = 0.0199). A multiple Cox regression model including tumor and nodal status, grading, age, hormone receptor status and pretreatment thrombocytosis identified pretreatment thrombocytosis as an independent predictive factor for OS (p = 0.0064) and breast cancer-related survival (p = 0.0162). Multivariate analysis failed to identify pretreatment thrombocytosis as an independent risk factor for DFS (p = 0.1355). In our retrospective study, elevated platelet counts at time of diagnosis were associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer. We hypothesize that platelets may contribute to the pathophysiology of hematogenous metastasis.
Thrombosis and Haemostasis 07/2003; 89(6):1098-106. · 5.04 Impact Factor
-
Marianne Schmid,
Raimund Jakesz,
Hellmut Samonigg,
Ernst Kubista,
Michael Gnant,
Christian Menzel,
Michael Seifert,
Karin Haider,
Susanne Taucher, Brigitte Mlineritsch,
Peter Steindorfer,
Werner Kwasny,
Michael Stierer,
Christoph Tausch,
Michael Fridrik,
Viktor Wette,
Günther Steger,
Hubert Hausmaninger
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To determine whether the addition of aminoglutethimide to tamoxifen is able to improve the outcome in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer.
A total of 2,021 postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to receive either tamoxifen for 5 years alone or tamoxifen in combination with aminoglutethimide (500 mg/d) for the first 2 years of treatment. Tamoxifen was administered at 40 mg/d for the first 2 years and at 20 mg/d for 3 years.
All randomized and eligible patients were included in the analysis according to the intention-to-treat principle. After a median follow-up of 5.3 years, the 5-year disease-free survival in the aminoglutethimide plus tamoxifen group was 83.6% versus 83.7% in the monotherapy group (P =.89). The corresponding data for overall survival at 5 years were 91.4% and 91.2%, respectively (P =.74). More patients failed to complete combination treatment (13.7%) because of side effects as compared to tamoxifen alone (5.2%; P =.0001).
Aminoglutethimide given for 2 years in addition to tamoxifen for 5 years does not improve the prognosis of postmenopausal patients with receptor-positive, lymph node-negative or lymph node-positive breast cancer.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 04/2003; 21(6):984-90. · 18.37 Impact Factor
-
Raimund Jakesz,
Hellmut Samonigg,
Michael Gnant,
Ernst Kubista,
Dieter Depisch,
Roland Kolb, Brigitte Mlineritsch,
Hans-Jörg Mischinger,
Rainer-Christian Menzel,
Peter Steindorfer,
Werner Kwasny,
Christoph Tausch,
Michael Stierer,
Susanne Taucher,
Michael Seifert,
Hubert Hausmaninger
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To confirm evidence that breast-conserving treatment (BCT) does not impair the prognosis in breast cancer patients as compared to mastectomy and to argue that it be regarded as the treatment of choice in stage I and II disease.
Scientifically, survival rates in breast cancer have been shown to be stage-dependent, but independent of the extent of surgical breast tissue removal, as long as the resection margins are free of tumor infiltration.
Between 1984 and 1997, six different trials conducted by the Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group accrued a total of 4,259 women with hormone-responsive disease. The authors selected and compared three patient groups (n = 3,316) according to pathologic stage, age, and the surgical procedure applied.
Over this interval, the BCT rate in the premenopausal node-positive subgroup experienced a highly significant increase from 27.2% to 73.2% overall. In the group of postmenopausal node-negative patients, the BCT rate grew significantly by 37.3% to 77.3% in total. With an overall BCT rate growing from 22.5% to 56.8% in postmenopausal node-positive women, those presenting with T1 tumors saw a significant increase from 35.1% to 65.9%. Mortality and local recurrence rates proved stable or even decreased considerably over time and in all subgroups.
The presented outcome of BCT rates, significantly improved over this 16-year period and in no way counterbalanced by higher local recurrence or death rates, reflects an excellent example of surgical quality control. BCT can safely be regarded as the standard of therapy for T1 and increasingly for T2 disease. Especially in multi-institutional adjuvant breast cancer trials, the highest priority should be given to breast-conserving procedures.
Annals of Surgery 04/2003; 237(4):556-64. · 7.49 Impact Factor
